Return to: Home | Politics | UK Politics

George, Nat and me

Gideon Donald

Published 23 October 2008

George, Nat and me

I am pleased to report that while Ricky Gervais was in London drumming up business for his new major motion picture we met to discuss what we might do for each other. Ricky has long been a Tory and Dave is a "huge fan", owning entire DVD sets of not only The Office but also Extras.

Both of us are keen to avoid a Kenny Everett at Wembley moment - as Ricky says, "There's cheesy and there's really cheesy." That said, some stage performance involving "Britain's funniest man" and the future prime minister (and maybe Sam Cam?) would work well for all of us. Maybe we can work-test it on the old Queen K.

Gervais is one of the sharpest potential donors I have had the privilege to meet. He is, if anything, too quick.

As is so often the way in the donation game, one wallet opens, another one closes. In this instance that of the celebrated film director Guy Ritchie. He had been earmarked to make the documentary to accompany Dave's First 100 Days (the diminutive public relations guru Steve Hilton was anxious for "the tone to be edgy yet populist") and had hypothecated a low seven-figure sum from one of Mrs Ritchie's accounts in order to fund the project. That particular gravy train, however, hit the buffers along with his marriage, and we are now scrabbling around for new investors in what can only be described as a challenging financial climate.

The nature and extent of that challenge being the subject of much discussion at competing country house gatherings last weekend. The socialists have played the politics of crunch awfully well, not least because it is far easier for them to carry off the whole "disappointed with bankers" act.

We, in contrast, have been a shower, with none drippier than my old friend George Osborne. As Jeff Randall magnificently put it, "He's not so much behind the curve as behind the curtain." Not for the first time, as those Bullingdon members who witnessed Oik's diffident performances on strip poker nights will attest. One of whom was that Bullingdon colossus, Nat Rothschild, who has never entirely forgiven GO following a disagreement at the end of the annual Mussolini dinner. No one was entirely sober, but what is beyond dispute is that NR ended up picking up a tab for many thousands while others were strangely absent. There aren't many rules in the Bullingdon but "Men of honour pay their share" is fairly cardinal.

Oik's recent limpness came under attack both at the weekend I hosted in the New Forest for, inter alios, John Redwood, Peter Lilley and Dominic Grieve, and the Camerons' do, which Gove and Letwin attended.

These social occasions are, if you desire to speak like Hilton, management bonding sessions, albeit from a time before management consultancy was invented. It remains a source of excessive pride to me that Lady Thatcher attended not one, but two, of my country house weekends. The chair on which she sat, on both occasions, has been preserved in the Grand Library in her honour.

Although I may be partial, it seems to me that the ideas emanating from the New Forest were (caveat Hiltonism) of a "different class" from those from Oxford.

Down in Hampshire, Redwood was on fire. Redders, as you can see from his remarkable blog, predicted every facet of the global economic meltdown months before it happened.

Let's hope the Great Man was rewarded for his prescience with a bundle in the markets.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

Roland Baker
24 October 2008 at 22:39

I deferred judgement on this column following the other criticisms of it posted last week, 17.10.08.

"That said, some stage performance involving "Britain's funniest man" and the future prime minister (and maybe Sam Cam?) would work well for all of us."

Drop the Sam Cam. Gordon Brown has not really gained from staging his wife at the Labour Party conference. She visited Glenrothes to the wrath of a Scotsman correspondent who tore her to shreds unwarrantably for some imagined slight about a question.

David and Samantha Cameron have a son with special needs. Gordon and Sarah Brown have two children. Given the pressures of modern politics, spouses of office holders bear a high burden of family responsibility which impacts on the welfare of the vulnerable. They should be free to attend to that out of the public eye. It was a mistake for David Cameron to allow the tabloids all over his family in March 2008.

Think Obama. Think cute and carefully cued children and a wife vicariously living ambitions beyond her role. Think potential for disaster.

On balance does the NS gain from having the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer described as an oik over some rich boys' sulk and initiation rights that amount to harassment and intimidation? NO.

If I were Dominic Grieve, would I want my name in this piece? NO. A top class forensic lawyer, who should be invited by Gordon Brown to be Secretary of State for Justice/Lord Chancellor to follow in the noble principles of Lord Mackay of Clashfern, deserves to be more than a by-word in some piece of graceless gossip.

The jury is no longer out. This column must go.

goveller
25 October 2008 at 16:30

gideon donald is everywhere. How does he find the time for all these social events (and what insider information will he divulge next week?). Strange that he was not a member of the bullingdon club (or was he). I have changed my mind about him. Keep him (or her?) on!!

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Gideon Donald

Gideon Donald first met David Cameron at Heatherdown preparatory school in Berkshire. Their friendship continued to prosper at Eton and the Bullingdon Club. His column Preparing For Power draws on his remarkable access to Cameron's coterie. Despite threatening to resign after guest editor Alastair Campbell spiked his article, Gideon continues to write weekly for the New Statesman.

Read More

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will the next election produce a hung parliament?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker