“The detainees have got pain in their eyes”

In my school report this summer, they said I was an excellent student. I am making a new start and o

Meltem came to this country in 2001 with her mother. They sought asylum here after the family was persecuted by Turkish police for being Kurdish. But because they'd passed through Germany, their asylum claim was refused. It was not turned down immediately, however, and by the time they were detained they had been in the country for six years, building a life for themselves. Meltem was doing very well at school and they had relatives in this country who had applied successfully for asylum. Meltem's bravery in speaking out while in detention won her many supporters, and she and her mother were eventually released and their case reheard. They now have refugee status. Meltem is back at school.

At 7 o'clock in the morning in August last year, at our home in Doncaster, I woke up to hear banging on the door. As soon as my mum opened the door, these men rushed in. They told us to be quick: they were shouting in our ears. They took us to the police station and then a car came and it was awful. It had a cage. For a minute, I thought to myself: Am I an animal? The journey took a long time and we ended up in Yarl's Wood. It's a detention centre, but it is no different from a jail.

At school I was good at science, maths and history, and I wanted to become a doctor. My teachers, they were really kind. I missed them all so much - just being at school and doing normal things with my friends. I was in Yarl's Wood for three months. For education, I got maths for nine-year-olds and jigsaw puzzles. They don't give you a proper education in Yarl's Wood, and anyway I don't think you can get educated when you know you're in prison. I saw a mother crying for her baby because she couldn't take it to health care, though the baby was vomiting and had a high temperature.

While I was there, I looked at the other people who were detained. I saw how they suffered from being in there. How they've just got pain in their eyes. When people are outside they've got that glowy thing in their eyes. In there, there isn't even such a thing as that.

In Yarl's Wood, my mum was sad and crying all the time. It was really hard, seeing her like that, and not knowing what to do to help. I did everything I could - I spoke to the befrienders who came to visit us and I spoke to journalists, too. I wrote letters for my mother to the European Court of Human Rights, telling about the persecution she suffered in Turkey and why we came to the UK and how we'd lived here for six years. I feel English through and through - I speak English and all my friends are here. This is my home.

We applied for bail five times. Every time they said no. Then on 15 November, at 3.25am, some officers came into the small room I share with my mother. They took us down to the reception. Five escorts arrived, one woman and four men, and the woman searched our bodies in front of the waiting men. They took us to a black van - two escorts sat next to me, one next to my mum, the other two in the front. They chatted among themselves during the journey. After a while they fell asleep. I looked out of the window, but it was dark. I was thinking: What are my friends doing? Will I see my school again? Why do I have to go into a country I don't know?

I felt angry with everyone. When we arrived at Heathrow, an officer said to me: "You know if you refuse to go on the plane, we'll put handcuffs on you and tie your feet. Tell your mum what I said." They drove us right next to the plane. They took my mum out, and my mum started crying more and tried not to go up the steps. The officer went on top of her, pushed her on to the floor, and hit her with the handcuffs. She was bruised and cut. He handcuffed her, and dragged her off the tarmac and up the steps to the very back of the plane.

I started crying, as I was scared. Two escorts held me by the hands. I kept saying: "Let me go." But one pinched my hands to make me go. On the plane, the officer sat next to my mother. She kept crying - he kept telling her: "Shut up, shut up." They sat me between two escorts who kept twisting my hands very hard. I kept saying: "I want to speak to the pilot." A teenage passenger started taking mobile-phone pictures. The plane moved a bit, then the pilot said over the intercom: "We are sorry for the disturbance. The deportees should be offloaded." So they took us back to Yarl's Wood, and then we were taken to Bedford Hospital.

When I was in hospital one day, on my birthday, the Children's Commissioner, Sir Al Aynsley-Green, came to see me, and the next day we were released. First, we were sent to an induction centre, where I started a new school, and then to Newcastle, where I had to start all over again in another school. But then our case was heard again and we have refugee status. In my school report this summer, they said I was an excellent student. I am making a new start and one day I will show everyone what I am capable of. But I will never forget Yarl's Wood.

8 comments

everttrue923's picture

These people know and are in fact briefed in "playing the system", even by lawyers if the evidence is to be believed". Notice, UK. Citizen how your logic is both debased and ignored by these do gooders! The fundmental aspect about the first country of entry is used both in attack and defence. The only thing that will save us violent revolution I am afraid!

UK Citizen's picture

I'm disappointed that these people were allowed to remain here.

Why shouldn't their claim be rejected and they be thrown out. They broke the immigration laws, the only ones apparently which can be flouted without ensuing criminalisation. These people should be forced to accept, like all the rest of us are, that not likeing a law does not mean it can be ignored. Rather than complain about ejection after six years, they should consider themselves lucky to have enjoyed six years to which they were not entitled.

I find the criticism of Yarls Wood ridiculous. They broke the immigration laws, they are criminals, they were detained. The differences between detention in Yarls Wood and a real prison were not of course mentioned. Are we supposed to believe the detention centre regeim matches that of a UK prison, let alone a Turkish one?

People who break the immigration laws are criminals, and it's about time we started treating them as such. It seems to me that cases such as this can do nothing but benefit the extrem right.

Lanoree's picture

Comparing those who break immigration laws to criminals is an extreme view point.

'UK Citizen' has the luxury of being born into a secure 'state where human rights and freedom of speech are for the most part valued.

'UK Citizen' appears to have a strong sense of self-importance and entitlement having not realised that their security and wellfare is not an earned right but good fortune.

Describing those fleeing dangerous regimes to criminals who deserve severe punishment is like comparing someone guilty of traffic offences to a regular perpertrator of grievious bodily harm. Of course the law should be respected but law should also show relativity.

UK Citizen's picture

Lanoree seems to be confused.

"Comparing those who break immigration laws to criminals is an extreme view point". I don't agree. They broke immigration laws, therefore they are criminals, what's extreme about that? It is actually a simple fact.

I'm well aware of the rights implicit in Western democracies and don't agree that these rights were won by good fortune. They were won by the sacrifices of our forebears, people prepared to sacrifice for others, particularly their own children.

Those living in dangerous regimes, and likely to flee if they get the chance, amount to hundreds of millions of people, are they all going to be allowed to break our laws to settle here? If not, how's the selection going to be made? In any case, most immigration law breakers are not fleeing dangerous regimes. At best they are economic migrants looking for a better life style, at worst they are benefit seekers.

"Describing those fleeing dangerous regimes to criminals who deserve severe punishment is like comparing someone guilty of traffic offences to a regular perpertrator of grievious bodily harm". I didn't say or imply that they should be subject to severe punishment. I said they should be treated as criminals. In fact I think that they should be arrested, held in prison and the thrown out of the country. This isn't severe, it's commensurate with the nature of the crime.

Rosalba's picture

Crimainals are those who make such laws.
We shoul instead have laws against racism: than all racists who are so hartless and inhuman to call a child 'criminal' will be criminals themselves, so we can finally imprison and deport them. Deport all racists and let the refugee children free!

UK Citizen's picture

Ah, the race card has been played already, twice in fact, to ensure the termination of discussion.

Higher trumps? What's a multiculturalist going to do after the looming fall of New Labour.

charles4's picture

to 'uk citizens' you seem to have forgotten that the riches and wealth we enjoy as a uk citizen is as a result of the sweat of the countries you call thier citizens criminal.

MorganGee's picture

I find it rather shocking that so many of you are so ill informed. No one has broken any laws, nor are they criminals. A person seeking asylum is not an illegal immigrant. They come here legally, and are accepted into the country, legally, while their claim is assessed. During that time, they are forbidden from working, to earn their own living, or from claiming State benefits. Some have children, and when they are born here, they are Stateless, with no rights to UK citizienship, nor benefits.

All have fled from torture, rape, and/or the threat of death. Unfortunately, the system does not accomodate their flight out of their native countries, unless they bring documented evidence of the torture etc. Scars and whip marks do not count. Paperwork proving their abuse, must be brought with them.

The people in all these testamonies, have fled such torture. They have entered the UK legally. They have stayed here, legally. Sometimes for over a decade. How many years to make a decision? How many years to make it fair, to one day, out of the bue, say "Yes, I know you are here legally, and you have settled, and made a life for yourself, but today we decide to tell you your claim has not been proved, and we are throwing you out."

No laws have been broken. No arrests and trials have taken place. No judgement had been given, no prison sentence passed.

To describe asylum seekers as ecomomic migrants, ot benefits seekers, is to wholly misunderstand the process. As I said, they are neither permitted to work, nor claim benefits.

And they are all admitted into the country, perfectly legally.

Latest tweets