Registered user login:

A lesson from Germany

Denis MacShane

Published 11 September 2008

Across Europe, parties of the left are replacing their leaders in a desperate attempt to regain lost ground. Denis MacShane on what Labour should learn

In a fit of despair at its slumping popularity, the main centre-left party in government decided to replace its burly party leader, whose poll ratings hovered around 25 per cent. A cerebral member of cabinet - best known as a staffer for the previous leader, a proven election-winner - was chosen in his place. The party in question is Germany's Social Democratic Party (SPD), whose leader, Kurt Beck, has just been replaced by the foreign minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier.

German papers are hailing the "re-Schröderisation" of the SPD: Steinmeier was a close aide of Gerhard Schröder as regional prime minister of Hanover in the 1990s and then as chief of staff between 1998 and 2005, when Schröder was chancellor. If he beats Angela Merkel in the September 2009 elections, it will be the first time that Steinmeier has been elected into office by German voters.

The Austrian Socialists did something similar in the summer. They narrowly won an election last November but their new chancellor, Alfred Gusenbauer, failed to inspire, so the party replaced him and called early elections, due to be held on 28 September. But the Socialists cannot get above 30 per cent of voting intentions despite changing their leader. The Austrian parliamentary left is in no better shape than the German Social Democrats.

The Sturm und Drang of Labour's sister parties in Germany and Austria reflect the wider mal aise of the democratic left in Europe: a sapping of will, an absence of ideology, and a lack of flair, style and risk-taking. The 20th-century European left is dying and a 21st-century democratic left cannot be born. Morbid symptoms are more in evidence than the confidence to show that progressive reformist politics can renew itself in the face of global dislocations.

German social democracy has many simila rities to Labour's. It has always compromised with market economics, summed up by Willy Brandt's phrase: "As much market as possible, as much regulation as necessary." It has also been strongly Atlanticist - Brandt was shouted down by the London left as a running dog of American imperialism when he tried to speak at Friends Meeting House in the early 1960s.

But that was the 20th century. Over the past decade, trade union membership in Germany has declined more than in Britain, and its unions seem incapable of reinventing themselves and organising the new proletariat - non-Germans, female part-timers and the self-employed. The SPD's membership fell this summer below that of the conservative CDU for the first time since 1950. Germany has politicians prepared to preach eloquently against George W Bush or in favour of a federal Europe, but the SPD has failed to find the language and ideas to inspire, leaving Europe without its social-democratic ballast.

Personality contests

The French left is unlikely to take up the reins: it has given up thinking and replaced politics with personality contests. At their November congress in Rheims, where French kings were once crowned, the Socialists must choose a new leader. Mitterrand-era men and women in their late fifties are proclaiming, "Moi, moi, moi," as they seek support from the dwindling group of activ ists who elect the party leaders.

Personality is important. Steinmeier is popular in Germany. But delivering Germany's cautious foreign policy, with its semi-neutralist moralising tone, is not the same as making tough decisions on nuclear power or cutting tax breaks for commuters, and thereby hitting entrenched vested interests. Perhaps the yet-to-be-elected Steinmeier will take risks and tell the truth to the power-holders in his party and the unions, but continuing immobilism is more likely.

Are there lessons for Labour to learn from the turmoil on the European democratic left? One common strand appears to be the cost of giving up political education as part of the centre left's work. Political leaders who cannot explain the world to their own followers do not create followers who can then explain the world to voters. Britain's Electoral Commission has an annual bonanza of £27m of taxpayers' money, yet there is not a single MP or councillor who knows what this money is spent on. Giving that cash to political parties for policy education would be a start, but after 11 years in power Labour has still not understood that democracy has to be paid for by the democracy, not by outside funders.

As it has de-ideologised itself, the European left has fallen victim to the politics of Heat and Hello! - an obsession with the who rather than the what and why of power. In replacing their leader, the German Social Democrats have shown a ruthlessness about wanting to win next year. But unless Steinmeier takes risks and challenges them to become something different, the future of central European social democracy remains bleak.

Denis MacShane is MP for Rotherham and a former minister for Europe (2002-2005)

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

Sharif
11 September 2008 at 11:50

Your assumption that we want who and not what is only partly true. The fact in Germany tell us something different. The party has slipped from left to middle so much that people consider it a conservative party with some added liberal ideas. The new Left party led by Oscar Lafontanine is attracting a lot of left wing votes and SPD working in center with CDU does not help its image. Angela Merkel gets all the credit and SPD is only playing 2nd fiddle. Personally I am more inclined to Greens, with young blood and very down to earth multicultureism.

Roland Baker
12 September 2008 at 16:46

In his NS article, "Miliband Was Right", which would have been ok if it could have been called accurately "Miliband Was Left", Denis McShane complained of looking hapless because the BBC edited his soundbite. From this article, I think it is Denis McShane who might just be hapless rather than misunderstood.

What he learns is that we should re-direct the £27 million it costs to run the Electoral Commission into Political Education. I expect it spends quite a lot of its money investigating Labour Deputy Leadership election funding scandals, which, in one case, provoked a "Jonathan Aitken" style cabinet resignation where a former secretary of state for unemployment and no pensions reached for a simple sword of trutth and has not been heard of since. Don't dish it out if you can't take it Denis. Just remember the front page of The Guardian on 30 November 2007. A Labour Prime Minister and Labour Party Deputy Leader like ferrets in a sack over funding the Deputy Leader's election campaign.

He refers to the cult of personality in the democratic left, to which it has fallen victim. All politics Denis has fallen victim to this - or won't anyone you know be wearing Sarah Palin glasses?

The beef is this:

"...trade union membership in Germany has declined more than in Britain, and its unions seem incapable of reinventing themselves and organising the new proletariat - non-Germans, female part-timers and the self-employed." The TUC should read, mark, learn, inwardly digest and add temporary workers - Germany doesn't have too many of those.

Glasgow East is what we need to learn and Glenrothes will say the same. You get elected if you offer Labour policies which include help with the cost of eldercare, no higher education tuition fees, free prescriptions, fair local taxation arrangements and robust social spending and structures.

left888
15 September 2008 at 13:09

The reason the European left parties change their leaders so much is for the Obama effect. Basically, everyone starts off optimisticly, during the contest, then the leader gets elected, then he/she reveals him/herself as a bosses lackey, then his/her approval ratings slide as time goes on, then the party replaces the leader and the process starts again.

Dirk
16 September 2008 at 14:51

Unfortunately the first paragraph of this article contains some factual errors.

Firstly, Kurt Beck was party leader of the SPD, he will be replaced by Franz Müntefering who has already led the party for a year, from 2004 to 2005. Steinmeier was chosen (by Beck!) to be the new candidate for chancellorship.

Secondly, Steinmeier has virtually NO experience in campaigning, therefore,he cannot possibly be called "a proven election-winner."

I am neither a party memeber of the left nor the right, but any valid analysis of the situation of the left in Germany should have started with Schröder's Agenda 2010 and the resulting formation of a new party, Oscar Lafontaine's "Die Linke."

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Denis MacShane

Denis MacShane is MP for Rotherham and was a minister at Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?