Return to: Home | Politics | UK Politics

‘‘I’ll leave when I finish the job’’

Gloria De Piero

Published 10 July 2008

In his most revealing interview yet, Gordon Brown talks exclusively to the New Statesman about his political fortunes, press criticism, Heathcliff - and why he won't resign

Gordon Brown's younger son, Fraser, has learned to pick up the phone in Downing Street, dial a zero to reach the No 10 switchboard, and ask to be put through to the member of staff he's taken a shine to.

The Prime Minister clearly finds this amusing, but his children are famously off-limits. As we sit in a first-class carriage on the 3.30pm train from Newcastle to London, accompanied by a handful of advisers, he gestures towards the tape recorder to indicate that he would like to change the subject.

Brown has spent the day in the north-east, accompanied by the New Statesman, meeting Labour Party activists and Unison members, and visiting staff and patients at Sunderland Royal Hospital. On the journey home, during a wide-ranging interview, he talks about his political fortunes, press criticism, socialism and the weekly ordeal that is Prime Minister's Questions.

He also reveals more about the real Gordon Brown than he is usually prepared to do . . . "Please, Please Me" by the Beatles was the first record he ever bought, he says; he talks about his favourite writers, who include Ian Rankin ("a great guy"), and his love of sport ("I could watch it all night"). He refuses to reveal what he bought his wife Sarah for her birthday, laughing, "Oh, come on. That's a secret," but then wonders aloud: "What might I buy her for her next birthday? I don't know. She does like jewellery." Sarah, if you're reading this, try to look surprised when you tear off the wrapping paper.

After a difficult first year in the job, Brown must have been hoping for a warm reception in Labour's heartlands. But although he is cheered and clapped when he enters the party's Newcastle HQ, it is obvious that some activists, who face daily hostility on the doorstep, believe their leader has weaknesses. I chat to Marjorie Kellett, the Bishop Auckland constituency secretary and a party member for more than three decades. "The Labour Party hasn't got its message across," she says. "He needs to communicate better."

She praises the passionate speech Brown delivers, prepared on the flight from London that morning by scribbling down a few keywords over a BA bacon sandwich, but says: "Once he's on telly he looks nervous. Eleven years into a Labour government, people say it's time for a change." There is no appetite to vote Liberal or Tory in this part of the country, but there is a BNP resurgence in her white working-class community, Kellett says. "The price of petrol, fuel and food, and the arrival of Polish immigrants, are the issues."

Robert Yorke, the constituency treasurer, joined the party 13 years ago when Tony Blair became leader. "Blair could condense his arguments into a soundbite, but Gordon can't," he says. "People want leadership and Gordon needs to lead. When Blair was there, you felt safe."

Voters' views

One of the problems for Brown, leading a government that is consistently 20 points behind in the polls, is that the public seems to share his own activists' view of his premiership and his character - although, on this trip, ordinary voters are eager to meet and greet their Prime Minister. Earlier in the day, at Sunderland Royal Hospital - a gleaming, freshly painted monument to the NHS - patients and staff respond well to Brown as he chats to them.

Many say he's taller and bigger in real life, and the words "personable" and "normal" crop up repeatedly. But even those who like him sense he's in trouble. "He's got a lot on his plate," says Gordon Fletcher, a 79-year-old patient who talks about the wonderful treatment he's received from hospital staff. Will he vote Labour? "I don't know . . . probably." I ask another patient, 78-year-old Robert Chambers, whether he will stick with the party. "Up here, you vote Labour out of habit," he replies, without very much enthusiasm.

Brown's leadership will be tested again this month at the Glasgow East by-election. It's one of the safest Labour seats in the UK. The SNP faces a huge task to overturn a 13,500 majority, but there is an expectation that it could succeed, and if Labour loses, there will be fresh speculation that Brown may be forced to stand down by his own party.

Earlier that day, I sat beside him in the back seat of a blue armour-plated, bulletproof Jaguar, surrounded by police outriders and protection officers, as he made a series of calls to the editors of Scottish newspapers, while we hurtled towards Heathrow. Each conversation followed a similar pattern: some small talk about football, followed by a serious chat about the importance of the Union and the threat the SNP poses to the future of the country.

When his Nokia isn't pressed to his ear, Brown is unfailingly polite and informal, insisting that I call him Gordon rather than Prime Minister, something his predecessor, supposedly more affable, never invited me to do. He talks about his holiday plans and asks about my work and my parents, but has the politician's knack of ignoring awkward questions. "You really need to hold on to Glasgow, don't you?" I ask at one point; he appears not to hear - maybe he doesn't - and continues to flick through his notes.

Brown must know that, even in Labour's strongholds, there is little enthusiasm for the government at the moment, and this is reflected at a Unison conference of health-care staff in the Gateshead Hilton on Newcastle's regenerated waterfront. Marion Langley, a 53-year-old administrative assistant for South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust and a party member for 15 years, is pragmatic about the below-inflation pay deal awarded to health workers. But she says people are disillusioned with the government, claiming that although voters have been complaining for two or three years, it is not listening. She thinks Gordon is a problem: "He was an excellent chancellor, but maybe we need a new frontman. The policies are OK, but the shopfront is lacking."

Loss of faith

Not everyone agrees. James Anthony, a 26-year-old nurse, says he and his colleagues should have been given a more generous pay rise, but defends the Prime Minister. "I don't accept the criticism. He's a real person who cares." But that is not the majority view. Liz Kneale, a 55-year-old Darlington community auxillary, claims: "People have lost faith. The Labour flame was dying out anyway, but now our leader has to be special and charismatic." Does she believe there will be a Labour government next time? "Not unless something drastic happens."

That could include a Brown resignation. Back on the train, I ask him if there are any circumstances under which he would stop doing the job. First, he gives his stock answer: "It's the best job in the world and every day there is a new challenge." But when pressed, he insists: "I'm here to do a job and I'll leave when I finish the job. I'm not here for the sake of being here." Talking about the economy, he says: "I think the first thing people want us to be able to do is to see ourselves through this difficult challenge." But his ambitions extend far beyond that. "I want to build a Britain where every single child has the opportunity to realise their potential. If you don't have young people whose talents are recognised and developed to the full, you're not going to have a successful society or a successful economy."

It is a familiar Brown refrain, and one that hints at a deep-seated egalitarianism, but when I ask him outright if he is a socialist, he chooses his words carefully. The answer is not a simple yes. "I don't think these labels help. They confuse people sometimes. I admire some of the people like Nye Bevan and Attlee, but I also admire people like Lloyd George. I admire a lot of people who have been progressives and have made big changes. I would say that we're about progressive change. There is a big divide between the two parties. We believe in the power of opportunity to change lives. And we believe that there must be a guarantee through public investment of opportunity for all. I think that's the key dividing issue."

Brown's performances at Prime Minister's Questions have often been lacklustre, and I ask if he dreads the weekly inquisition, as some former prime ministers - Tony Blair included - have confessed, after leaving office. "The question is: does this sort of theatre illuminate the big issues," he says. "I don't think it's so much about how one feels. You've got to be up on every issue. There's nothing you cannot be asked about and I suppose . . ." He pauses. "The question is: does it help solve problems and illuminate the big issues and big challenges of the country? That's the real issue. And I think the country is asking whether it really illuminates all the big issues. The great irony about this, and you find it frustrating, is there are big challenges ahead. You've got climate change, you've got what's happening to oil prices, you've got terrorism and security and these are rarely issues that come up."

Heathcliff? Absolutely

Most observers agree the Prime Minister has improved at the despatch box after being mauled by David Cameron early on. But Brown remains an unsympathetic figure in the eyes of the electorate. His advisers may have tried to turn his brooding seriousness into an electoral asset, but they must secretly hope he would share more private moments with the public, which seems to have decided that he lacks warmth.

There is a human side to Gordon. He may be uncomfortable talking about himself, but on the train home our conversation is punctuated with laughter, and most of it is neither nervous nor insincere.

Is he a romantic? I ask. "Ask Sarah," he chuckles. Some women say you remind them of Heathcliff, I suggest. Brown is, after all, brooding and intense. "Absolutely correct," he jokes. "Well, maybe an older Heathcliff, a wiser Heathcliff."

How does he relax? "I like watching sport on television, but I'd like to go to more sporting occasions. I could watch sport all night. Although watching Andy Murray's five-set match wasn't particularly relaxing. I'd just arrived back. It was the fourth set and it went to five. Andy Murray's had to change his tactics on the court. I think he's very determined and I think he's done pretty well," Brown adds. He's talking about his fellow Scot, but you can't help wondering if he's really describing himself. Like Murray, Brown has had a bad press, but claims to be unperturbed. "I think you've got to be sure you're doing the right thing. You can't be deterred by people criticising you or a few newspapers making it their business to criticise you." Surely it must hurt when he hears people saying he's doing a bad job? "I think I'm just like everybody else. If you believe in something strongly enough, you get on with it."

As one would expect, Brown is an avid reader when he can find the time. He consumes novels as well as non-fiction. I ask him what he reads and he replies without hesitation, "Ian Rankin. He's a good guy, Ian, and he writes well." A fellow Scot, too, I point out. "I think Raymond Chandler was a great writer," he adds, hurriedly.

Misconceptions

It's difficult to imagine the Prime Minister unwinding in front of the TV with a glass of wine in his hand - "I tend not to drink. You've got to be fresh in the morning" - but he claims to enjoy crime thrillers. "One of the recent things I saw was The No 1 Ladies' Detective Agency done by Anthony Minghella before he died. Absolutely brilliant. Poor man. He was a great guy and he just died so suddenly."

Other questions are answered rapidly, and predictably. When were you happiest? "At the birth of my children." What's the most unexpected thing about the job? "The unexpected." What time do you go to bed? "It depends." How many hours' sleep? "It varies." Could he survive on Margaret Thatcher's legendary four hours a night? "No, that's not enough."

"What's the most common misconception about you?" I ask. "That's not for me to say. You tell me what people say and I'll tell you whether it's right or wrong." Well, I say, people claim you are always losing your temper. "When you've got difficult decisions to make you've got to be calm and considered," he says. "I don't generally lose my temper." As far as I can tell, this answer is not delivered through gritted teeth.

Towards the end of the interview, an hour away from London, I ask the Prime Minister to name his most unappealing habit. "I've tried to stop biting my nails. They're pretty good," he boasts, before glancing down at his hands. "OK," he laughs, "they're not." His attempt to cover up an embarrassing truth before coming clean is something we can all relate to. Perhaps Gordon Brown is not so different from the rest of us, after all.

Gloria De Piero is political editor of GMTV

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

35 comments from readers

john problem
10 July 2008 at 09:44

Many of us wish we could pick up the phone and get through to a member of Downing Street's staff.........

Robert Powell
10 July 2008 at 10:30

Which goes to show you shouldn't compare yourself to characters in books when you apparently haven't read them!

redharry
10 July 2008 at 12:37

Gloria De Piero is political editor of GMTV, which is like being the literary editor of The Sun.

How thoughtful of Gloria to avoid any mention of the two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan - or has she forgotten about them?

The once serious 'Staggers' has hit a new low - what next?

Jonny Mac
10 July 2008 at 12:57

"There is a big divide between the two parties. We believe in the power of opportunity to change lives. And we believe that there must be a guarantee through public investment of opportunity for all. I think that's the key dividing issue."

But it's not, is it? Cameron would happily sign up to both of those ideas.

penfold
10 July 2008 at 14:54

Pathetic excuse for an interview; "Are you a romantic?" I mean come on; surely you can do better than that. Frankly I couldn't give a **** about Brown the man, what I want to know is why the labour party have decided the best course of action is to duck any policy debate. Where is the economic 'plan' that was promised in the house? What is the government doing about youth violence, other than the old tired and failing formulas? Why has Afghanistan gone from a quick in-and-out mission (as Blair presented it to cabinet colleagues) to a potential 30 year conflict that is more to do with Pakistan's stability than any of the original mission objectives? What does the PM actually believe his rhetoric on Zimbabwe will achieve? Why did he let his own front benchers and whips vote to keep MP’s expenses, and why did he not propose/enforce a party line? And given his comment that he will stay until the job is done; what exactly is his job?

Derek Bennett
10 July 2008 at 14:58

What does Gordon Brown mean by "finishing the job"? Doeas he mean he won't leave until he has handed the running of the UK over to the EU completely, rather than the 80 or so per cent it already controls?

Viscount Firm
10 July 2008 at 17:46

Heathcliff was a huge example to me in my life and that of my ancestors. Hence the family motto: Always a firm hand or semper manus firmus as it says in the great hall.

Viscount Firm
10 July 2008 at 19:25

None of us were any good at Latin!

knave
10 July 2008 at 20:54

‘‘I’ll leave when I AM finishED because OF the job’’

I have a soft spot for you Gordon, mainly because Nick hates you and you are not the devil incarnate, but I am afraid you are a dead man walking

PW
10 July 2008 at 21:55

To Gordon Brown and his mates in Government, all I can say is that there's none so blind as those who won't see.

Jakka
11 July 2008 at 00:52

He IS brooding and intense - which is a great deal better than Blair's hammy acting of sincerity

Jakka
11 July 2008 at 00:53

He IS brooding and intense - which is a great deal better than Blair's hammy acting of sincerity. Who felt safe when Blair was PM? I didn't.

grace
11 July 2008 at 10:35

Dear oh dear, I thought the new statesman could do better than this - it reads like something that would be more at home in Hello magazine. Or does this demonstrate the level of political debate in this country today.

smenj
11 July 2008 at 10:59

‘‘I’ll leave when I finish the job’’

We don't want you to finish it! Get out now for God's sake, before you can cause any more damage. it's going to take years to fix the mess you've made, don't hang around any longer making it worse!

tommacf77
11 July 2008 at 12:36

Just when you thought things could not get any worse, it emerges this morning that Brown is planning to

get involved in Nigerian Oil.

Strictly in order to boost productivity, you understand.

The suffering of the peoples of the Niger Delta who are helpless spectators as Western Oil interests pillage their homeland, and put nothing back, is - not unexpectedly - off Brown's neoliberal radar set.

Stand by for Iraq Mark II.

Davidoff
11 July 2008 at 12:59

k

Davidoff
11 July 2008 at 13:09

Brown's moral ambition may be to help every child achieve their potential. But his political ambition is factional: he manoeuvred against Blair and now he manoeuvres against Cameron. That is not leadership, and it has led to anaerobic government - government that is not motivated by the oxygen of the electorate.

I lost it with Brown the day he matched the Tories' Inheritance Tax proposals. He grinned across the floor of the House with low political delight. Wrong decision, wrong motivation.

This ferment must stop - Labour needs to appoint a people's Prime Minister without delay.

ikotubo
11 July 2008 at 13:55

To Gloria De Piero: Well, in case you didn't know, Mr Brown is now widely alleged to have identified himself with Heathcliff (even though no one seems sure about which incarnation of this most mercurial of characters to associate him with). Any possibility o setting the record straight?

lowwageearner
11 July 2008 at 19:49

Can't believe anyone still thinks he was a good chancellor - certainly no one with a private pension. or who isn't sucking on the teat of the state. Have his fiscal policies helped the average Joe (or Mac) in the Glasgow East constituency due to have a by-election soon?

He mishandled the sale of gold ensuring the price plummetted before the sale. 10p tax fiasco? National Debt?

He's ambitious - nothing wrong in that - but he doesn't really have any economoic skills - he's been a disaster for the nation's economy.

1997 I cheered Blair and labour into power. But they've been disastrous - bloody awful in fact.

Wouldthe Tories be any better? Who can say? But this lot don't deserve to be rewarded for such gross bad leadership.

chris37uk
11 July 2008 at 21:14

David Cameron likes chasing wild animals to exhaustion before they are ripped apart by a pack of dogs, all for fun.

Gordon Brown likes reading and watching real sport. Give me Gordon Brown thank you, not sadist Cameron.

Nilsey105
11 July 2008 at 22:10

I thought this article was attempting to expose GMTV and the quality of jounalist they employ. Learners.

Oh Viscount Firm you old softy none of you were or are any good at anything including degrees of hardness.Poor limpy you.

Nilsey105
11 July 2008 at 22:11

journalist

knave
12 July 2008 at 08:57

lowwage earner, I doubt it,

I don't think the Lbaour government has been a compete fiasco.

Minimum wage was good initiative and the return to the sale of gold are mistakes that many governments have made.

.Also there are now less people sucking off the teat of the state than in the days of your herione Mrs T.

Also as for national debt it was the same under the Tories as Labour.

Also the UK economy is in a better state than your conservative tax cutting government economy of the US.

Frannie and freddie makes northern rock look like a picnic.

knave
12 July 2008 at 10:41

Also on the topic of national debt.

It rose under Mrs T and new labour in real terms. Although this nothing compared to the economically US conservative tax cutting governments of Reagan and Bush

here is a multiple question for you Hightorywage earner

Name the one government in which the national debt actually declined in real terms

1. Thatcher

2. Blair

3. Callaghan.

Broga
12 July 2008 at 11:17

Brown seems no better than Blair. All the signs of trying to soften the image: family man, little kid picking up the phone to talk to someone he has taken a shine to........ Imagine some sycophant at Downing Street taking that call. What an honour! Try taking a few calls from the patients sitting for hours in out patients at Casualty with broken limbs, or perhaps the parents of dead young men, or crippled young men and women back from Iraq. Or perhaps make a call to Blair telling him that he is to be tried for misleading parliament.

keith
13 July 2008 at 11:00

in this article you quote a unison delegate Marion Langley as being pragmatic about the below inflation pay award to the heatlth workers - what should be noted is that it was Unison and the RCN that

agreed to this award behind the backs of the other unions involved in health Keith Lindley (UNITE)

roger tanneau
13 July 2008 at 16:18

How sad that Brown was not challenged in this pussy footing interview.He evades responsability for the war in Irak,the broken referendum promise and controlling MP's expenses but was not pushed on these problems...Heathcliff is discussed instead.

writeon
13 July 2008 at 22:08

The standard of political debate in the UK is very low. Pesonalities are replacing politics, because for all intents and purposes we have evolved into something close to a one party state. We are living in the twilight years of democracy. The militarized and privatized corporate state awaits us all.

Brown himself seems confused and lacking in intellectual vigour. He appears to actually believe in the mythology of capitalism, rather than the substance. This entire idea of establishing equality of opportunity in a class based society, with such massive levels of inequality, is ridiculous. Brown's attitude would be almost touching, if one believed he had the faintest idea what he was talking about.

no arms
14 July 2008 at 10:58

When he 'finishes he job' the should then remember to wipe.

Red Shift
14 July 2008 at 15:49

Its not just a job he occupies, he remains unelected in the top job. Illegitimate like Healthcliff though not the son of a slave.

gnuneo
15 July 2008 at 04:09

he is desperate, he sees huge questions but not how to solve them, and he is burdened by secrets he must not ever speak.

the senior ranks of the civil service are offering no good answers, he cannot explain his truth of the situation to the public, and he knows if he continues this course he will be the scapegoat.

it wouldn't be so bad, if cameron wasn't 20x worse, with Robot Redwood waiting in the wings of the shadow treasury.

not a comfortable position to be in for brown, and if he has the smallest sense he doesn't trust any of the bunch of youngish technocrats around him either, the ones most likely to 'take power' if - when - he falls.

no, his worries are open, i would say.

Fridoun
16 July 2008 at 09:58

Food prices and fuel utilities keep rising, while the public struggling to meet the ends, PM claims public waste food. Does he not see that chin stores damp 35% of their product in order to keep prices and hence profit high?

Is it not about the time to freeze the price rise and bring the gap between rich and poor closer"

Fridoun

adrian
17 July 2008 at 18:42

I remember my elder relatives advising me on why voting was so important, how people had lost their lives to ensure that our voices are to be heard; remind me again, who voted Gordon into power? Did I miss a general election? How loud do we have to shout before Gordon realises that we don't have confidence in him and that for the good of us all - he should give up the chair that he "inherited"

gnuneo
30 July 2008 at 05:30

adrian: we do not elect our leaders, we elect parliamentarians, from amongst whom the Queen chooses who will lead us. (in theory, now of course it is by tradition the leader of the largest party).

we are a parliamentary democracy, not a presidential democracy, nor a direct democracy. In theory, the PM is only the 'first amongst equals', and therefore there is no reason to have a general election merely because the largest party changes who is their leader.

this is our political system. In theory.

Reginald
16 October 2008 at 07:22

Hi guys! I was never read the bedtime story of heathcliff, so can someone tell me the tale. My understanding of heathcliff is that he was a murderer(with smoke coming from his nose) who killed his lover and dug her up again. Is this correct? Love the fun article and i would go as far as to say its the best political article of 2008!

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker