Return to: Home | Politics | UK Politics

A tale of two Davids

Tara Hamilton-Miller

Published 17 July 2008

Cameron is wasting no time. But what can the former shadow home secretary do with his?

In Westminster there may be a feeling of winding down, but with all the doom-laden talk of a credit crunch, David Cameron is wasting no time, and is busy making speeches to the business community ahead of the summer break. The strategy is to get all this out before the financiers go off, worrying about their bonuses, for their family holidays, and the two leaders go off to embrace Britain. (This bothers neither of them; unlike the Blairs, Cameron and Gordon Brown are more than happy with British shores.) While Brown lectures on leftover porridge and powdered egg, Cameron is determined to be heard talking about business and the economy.

Lots of older Tory MPs are impressed by George Osborne, who has managed to be everywhere over the past fortnight - he is growing on the doubters who worried about his age. With an election now less than two years away, ill-feeling of suspicion or of old-fashioned jealousy about Cameron has been put aside. "David is one of us," says a shadow cabinet minister, "but he's also not - he knows that his job is to evaluate us. There has to be a bit of distance, as one day he will pick the final team." Even if many MPs don't get the full strategy, they get that they need him.

The week marked the return of the people's poli tician, the prince of noble endeavours - David Michael Davis. But what to do with him now that he has returned triumphant?

"With DD now there's a distinct feeling that it's like having a small child," says one MP affectionately. "You need to keep him amused, otherwise he'll start prodding the other kids or wee in the sandpit."

One of the earlier ideas that someone came up with was that he could chair a commission on social mobility. What everyone had forgotten is that Davis set up just such a committee last year and is already chairing it. This is what happens when you are predominantly known for your machismo - people forget you do other stuff, too.

Another suggestion was that he could be put in charge of a review to consider all the powers the state has the authority to interfere in. "It would be of little consequence. In opposition, titles rarely matter - they exist for vanity," says a shadow minister. "If he discovers a truly shocking case, it's not as if he can resign again. But he does need something."

A friend thinks that Davis has manoeuvred himself into a tricky situation. "He claims he doesn't want to be a single- issue campaigner, after what's happened to Ken." The reference is to Kenneth Clarke, but also to John Redwood and to some extent Iain Duncan Smith - respected people who sit on the Tory back benches, who say something on their specialist subject once every few months, but have become comment fodder rather than executive material.

Davis had a welcome-back party at the Quirinale restaurant, a Westminster favourite named after Rome's presidential palace. A good choice for this Cassius-like Shakespearean character.

Labour's last hope is that the Tories have no clear thinking or policies. This week Oliver Letwin writes in the New Statesman, claiming that the Conservative Party is the champion of the poor. According to a strategist who agrees with Letwin: "The Tories need to be seen as having solutions to poverty. The challenge is for Cameron to say this without being redistributive. For the able-bodied, welfare should be a casualty clearing station, not a way of life."

People are saying that the Tories are doing well, but what do they stand for? Last summer there was a huge amount of policy work carried out, yet the party suffered under the illusion that everyone was listening to speeches at think-tank events or spring conferences. "We made a few mistakes with timing," admits one senior Tory, "launching interesting policy on a big international news day, or when a Spice Girl got married . . ."

In future, people will say: what Spice Girl? What wedding? Whereas Tory policy . . .

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

3 comments from readers

Carl Jones
17 July 2008 at 18:40

Who is David Cameron? I thought you ment David Davis and David Icke.LOL

Checkout David Icke`s Big Brother speech on youtube, its brilliant.

gnuneo
18 July 2008 at 19:26

"According to a strategist who agrees with Letwin: "The Tories need to be seen as having solutions to poverty. The challenge is for Cameron to say this without being redistributive."

ROTFLMAO - so with millions of unemployed, the tories are STILL going to go with "its your own fault if you're unemployed"? So its OK for the tories that the top 10% of British Wealthy have DOUBLED their share of the UKs wealth in the last 10 yrs, whereas the vast majority see falling or at best stagnant incomes (ignoring what the housing crisis is currently doing to wealth ownership within the UK)?

but the tories still "shy from redistribution"? The tories are riding high on new-labour's *lack* of redistributive platform elements, the People are feeling the pinch, and are not happy.

how far will camoron's smarmy, golden-coke-spoon-up-the-nose public school-boy razzmatazz take the tories, when the recession really hits?

the "tory solution to poverty" will be that everyone will be forced to work, which will drive down wages (as the anti-immigrants claim), with reduced Labour rights and a pathetically small minimum wage. This is the classic Victorian approach to "reducing poverty" - and historically failed wholesale, amidst widespread misery.

you might win the next election, due largely to the new-labour govt being thatcherites in all but name, but unless you recognise that effective govt, society and economy *REQUIRES* redistribution, a tory govt won't have long before those 'dirty, unwashed masses' you hate so much are parading outside your Westminster offices, and your 'time in the sun' extremely brief indeed. The British Public have had enough, they're waking up, and they are heartily sick of you all.

its time for you to remember you are PUBLIC *SERVANTS*, not PUBLIC MASTERS.

Carl Jones
19 July 2008 at 13:26

"Solutions, solutions and solutions....you really should watch David Icke`s Big Brother video on google.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Will China rule the world?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker