Right to strike over low pay

Since 2004 local government workers have had below inflation awards. Their vote in favour of strike

Next month (July) 600,000 UNISON local government members will take strike action over a 2.45 per cent below inflation pay offer. This is not a decision they take lightly - our members are there to serve the public - but they are facing an unjust pay policy and feel pushed into a corner.

Labour inherited a recruitment and retention crisis in our public services. Morale was low and services were suffering. A lot has been achieved, but we cannot afford to undo this good work. We all want quality public services, but they do not come cheap and workers deserve fair pay and good conditions.

Councils are already struggling to compete for staff with other public and private sector employers – even in low wage areas. If they fall further behind, local authorities will not have the staff to deliver services – let alone work towards making improvements and delivering change.

Local government workers continue to be the poor relations of the public sector. Since 2004 they have had below inflation awards, but the vote in favour of strike action this week underlines the message that you can push people only so far before they say enough is enough.

It is crunch time for our members who provide the every-day services that people rely on - teaching assistants, social workers, care workers, librarians, dinner ladies, lollipop ladies, leisure and parks and garden staff as well as refuse collectors and street cleaners. It cannot be right that 250,000 staff still earn less than £6.50 an hour and they have said clearly they cannot afford to accept another below inflation offer.

Three quarters of council workers are women, who, far from fuelling today’s inflation, are victims of the rising prices of everyday essentials. They are being hit hard by the cost of putting food on the table, spiraling gas and electricity bills and the recent hikes in fuel.

There is not an economist in the country who agrees with Government claims that public sector pay fuels inflation. If the government is serious about tackling inflation they need look no further than the boardroom bonanzas and big city bonuses. They should tackle the corporate greed of the energy
companies BP and Shell making £7 billion profit in just three months.

In the meantime local government workers, who have to use their cars for work, are effectively subsidising their employers – they are left out of pocket because fuel prices have overtaken their mileage rates.

It is a disgrace that tens of thousands of public sector workers cannot afford to live in the communities they serve. I said at our conference last week that we reject Brown’s pay policy. We didn’t elect a Labour
government to watch its core supporters suffer this way. We don’t want Gordon to feel our pain we want him to stand up and heal it.

Dave Prentis is general secretary of Unison

18 comments

marilyn's picture

Hi.
I work as a Nursery nurse and I am expected to take the class whilst the teacher is out of the classroom one afternoon a week to do her preparation and planning. If a teaching assistant covers the other classes she gets double pay, however I get no more as I was told a nursery nurse earns enough money anyway!

popster's picture

When you enter into a contract of employment, you know how much the pay is going to be before you accept it. In the public sector we are fortunate enough to get cost of living increases every year. This does not happen in the private sector. When times are harder, there are no pay increases in the private sector.
Those who think we should strike because we have such a rough deal in the public sector should try comparing their pay against people doing similar work in the private sector. In my area of work we get about 40% more than private sector equivalents, and far, far better benefits.

maggiemin's picture

I am very concerned for the lower paid sector in our union. As a socaial worker I am very busy but consider myself adequately paid. Clearly from messages and from p[eople I know, dinner staff, care staff (the few left in unions) are appallingly low-paid. I wish we could find a way of striking to improve the pay ratio; the lower paid need a much bigger rise than the rest of us. I voted "no" in the ballot as I consider this strike unlikley to achieve a good outcome at this moment in time, but I will go on strike as I believe in being a union member, whatever personally I may think.

EnzoF1's picture

All of the people at the school my wife has recently started working at say the will not be striking as the head teacher has claimed to have found evidence that they can't as it's a Church of England school.

I have never heard anything like this before, has anyone else?

Barnsey's picture

What about the appalling conditions our children are expected to learn in & teachers are expected to work in. When are these issue going to be fairly represented by members. I fully support our providers of education but striking repeatedly over pay & never the equally important issues of decent working/learning conditions for all seems grossly unfair. Decent pay & DECENT CONDITIONS FOR ALL OF OUR CHILDREN TO LEARN IN!

genecrabtree920's picture

Dave, Im sorry, but I fail to understand what the problem is. If I was paid badly, I would quit and get something better. If I was paid badly but I couldn't get anything better because of a lack of skills, then I would accept the situation, grateful that I was getting the best deal available for me. If you can get more money elsewhere, why don't you quit? If you can't, you're getting a good deal- why are you complaining?

mumjules's picture

Hi - I know I am stating the obvious here but how do we afford to strike for 2 days? Many of us are single parents on a very tight budget and as much as we agree with the strike and want to support it, financially we just cannot manage without 2 days pay? Jules

TimTom's picture

As a Unison member Im disgusted with the actions of those who purport to represent me. Unison pay £800k per month in political levies into an almost bankrupt Labour Party. The threat of withdrawal of the funding would be enough to bring the Government to the table out of fiscal necessity. So why haven't we threatened them with this? Could it be anything to do with our glorious leaders being afraid to ruin their own future political ambitions?? Strike?? You mst be joking. Take some of the risk yourselves and i might be interested.

cartwright12's picture

lance.1.7.08 can i just say that mr brown is just one big joke the quicker he is out of power the better for the brittish people. its ok for him how he has got in power i will never know. i would love to know wot salariey a year he gets.

HLTA's picture

It does not matter how much Mr Brown gets.. he gets more in allowances/pension and a "pay off" when he is out of office anyway, What does he and others care about us, the working puplic. And I enjoy my work (teaching assistant) so want to keep doing what I do but get paid for it. The cost of living rate they use for our rise is based on the low rate not the true higher one.

Latest tweets