Return to: Home | Politics | UK Politics

Tactical Briefing

Jesse Armstrong

Published 08 May 2008

From the Unit...

So, pretty good week. I mean technically our worst week since 1963. But considering how terrible things feel, think it's been a pretty good week. After all, you're still in office. You kept it together on Marr and nobody could tell you'd been crying so shortly before going on air, or see the marks on your leg from the incident. And let's not forget, even after the election, we are the third-most-supported political party in the whole of the UK! That's quite a boast.

So, as regards political tactical matters - obviously we are going to lose the next general election. Think one thing that would be good would be for us to accept that there's nothing we can do about this fact, and that everything we have tried or might try will inevitably make things worse.

We know that regarding this, some have accused us of defeatism. But that feels unfair. Defeatism is failing to engage in a battle because you fear you might lose. We are Victorists. We are conserving our energy for after the inevitable victory of our opponents.

After all, if we start our plans for the fightback now, we will be ahead of the game. Who knows, perhaps the forthcoming Tory landslide might be kept below 1997 levels? That's something to aim for, isn't it? Plus, if we start looking at strategies for coming back into government now, we might be able to limit the Tories' period in power to just two, or maybe even (and we really think this might be possible however much the cabinet and senior colleagues may disagree) only one term of office? That's one sweet dream, right?

There is a question of how you should approach this. Obviously it would be unusual for a sitting prime minister to admit they are definitely going to lose the next election. We may want to steer away from an open acceptance. There is a residual concern it may be in some way illegal, for example. However, we should consider the positive benefits of you conceding defeat at this early stage.

For one, it would massively increase your credibility. We want to present you as an honest, straightforward figure. How can we do that if you are one of the few unincarcerated adults of normal intelligence in the country who claims you will be the prime minister come 2010? Also, once you accept defeat we can start to pitch you as the best man to lead Labour out of the wilderness we are heading for and back into power. That's appetising, isn't it?

Really think it would wrong-foot the Tories in the chamber if every time they taunt or attack we sort of shrug and say, "Yes, fine, stop going on! We've already said it's your turn next." They will look unpleasant and bullying if they keep harping on about our faults when we've already admitted they are so grievous that we see no chance of electoral success.

Think this might all be very exciting! Let us know your thoughts.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

1 comment from readers

johannine
10 May 2008 at 06:31

I think your onto a 'wining ' stragidy here jessie ,it is far easier to critise than build ,and acting like an opposition [while in power shows origonal thinking] , something that neo [new] labour hasnt understood.

Clearly the tories know the mantra to get elected [social responsability and giving the elect-tory-rate the impression you will put the people before big buisness as usual] , i think we all know the game [once in power they can get back to serving the special intrest lobby]

Of course having the oppisition mindset [while still in power to actually be doing change now,] only fools enough voters to a certain percentage point ,but anything to get 40 percent of a three party farce should be able to scrape back in for another term to serve our elite task masters

We have done the numbers and note the electorate has a short term memory ,if we keep hammering home they never had it so good ,

that the tories are the great pretenders ,only copying labours unfulfilled policy and we are the true party only partly accountable for prolonging the thatcher farce ,we can get our masters and sponcors support giving us the big bucks to advertise how good our spin meisters really are in failing to reform neo con reform's dating back to the eighties.

we can make gorden look like a commonn class working slob , to remind the people the toffs and their public school tie elites , are only pretending , while we deliverd tax breaks to their bosses [that will no doudt any day now trickle down to them] just give us your vote and for sure next term we will briefly try to be different.

Another alternative is to adopt as our own policy any oposition policy that gets their numbers up [it worked for their mate and cureent adviser for 3 terms in the colenies jonny howard ,and in adopting their policy they have no leg to stand on [plus its only an electoral promise [not a core promise] ,and certainly not put into govt law asa howard did

The secret is in naming the policy [but making it unlawfull or unable to work] thus we [he] made 'work choices' that forced workers to accept the choices the employers [our masters ] made ,but was easilly able to be accredited [spun] as a workers choice , but clearly wasnt meant to be .

That was backed up with work for the dole [but affectivly made it so it was impossable to get on the dole [looked good in the unemployment numbers , but was clearly destructive ,and in the end was repealed [but got howard and co horts relected into another term.]

Well gorden will be pulling plenty of 'howard'sss stunts [but his spin adviser advises boris now] ,but we may be able to get our masters to get him to change sides ,but it would appear the lie is easier to pull off from governing position rather than opposition.

We need to prepare for the worst ,knowing who ever gets in powew knows all the spin., and if and when they get in they will only be serving the same elites they allways have.[ask is this a core promise [or why make it policy when as govt you could be making it L>A>W.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Also by Jesse Armstrong

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker