Time for universal free school meals

Labour's Sharon Hodgson says universal free school meals are a vote winner and would boost the natio

If one thing is clear from the recent round of elections it is that voters don’t think much to the choice being served up by our politicians. That is why I’m working with fellow MPs, trade unions and charities to add an option to the menu. A free, locally sourced, school meal for each and every child. Think about it. It would benefit our nation’s health and education as well as the environment

The current generation of children could be the first in over a century whose life expectancy falls. If we are to lay claim to truly progressive politics and hit our child poverty targets then we need to rediscover the relationship between bold ambition and big thinking. Free school meals would be one way of doing this.

On a visit to Sweden, I saw how integral lunch time can be to the school curriculum. Classes and teachers ate together as a unit. The food was tasty, healthy and appetising. All the children tucked in heartily, helped themselves to seconds and tidied up after themselves before retuning to wipe down the tables. Many of the teachers I spoke to were shocked to discover this was not common practice in the UK. I didn’t have the guts to tell them that our dinner ladies have to compete with an average of 23 fast food outlets per secondary school.

We can’t blame the parents, or the kids. The cost of school meals to parents is expected to hit £2 per child in the near future. It is little wonder packed lunches are viewed are popular but these do not guarantee a healthy balanced diet. Neither can you expect a teenager to stay in school at lunchtime when all their mates are off to the chip shop, that’s why stay on site policies need to be enforced across the board.

Whether it is local fish, root vegetables or fresh fruit, we are lucky enough to have a tremendous amount of regional diversity in our food. This should be reflected in the nation’s school food. Every pound spent on local produce is worth twice as much to the local economy so we should aim to meet the Soil Association’s target that 50% of the food used in school meals should be sourced locally.

There is a clear link between lifestyle and educational achievement. The increased concentration which comes with a healthy diet is a bonus for pupils and teachers alike as neither has to suffer from the inevitable sugar spikes and lethargy brought on by snacks and stodge.

Of course, there is a cost attached to such a sweeping change. My own research suggests universal free school meals would rack up a bill of £1 billion. Government officials have told me the tab is more likely to be £2 billion, either way as far as I’m concerned it is worth it.

Obesity is estimated to be costing the public purse £3.5 billion a year already and this will only increase without immediate action.

Almost 70 MPs have now signed a motion calling for free school meals to be piloted across the country. I’ve set up the FULL campaign group to make the case in Parliament. We are looking carefully at what lessons can be learnt from elsewhere in the UK including Hull and Scotland where pilots have been very successful. Ministers are aware of the campaign which has been described by Minister for the Cabinet Office Ed Miliband as ‘ingenious’.

In my view it is not ingenious, it's obvious and I’ll continue urging ministers to use their loaves. Ensuring our children eat brain food, not fast food will pay dividends in the long run. It might not be as cheap as chips but to an electorate suffering rising food prices it might just look too good to resist.

Sharon Hodgson is Labour MP for Washington and Sunderland West. 

Getty
Show Hide image

The New Times: Brexit, globalisation, the crisis in Labour and the future of the left

With essays by David Miliband, Paul Mason, John Harris, Lisa Nandy, Vince Cable and more.

Once again the “new times” are associated with the ascendancy of the right. The financial crash of 2007-2008 – and the Great Recession and sovereign debt crises that were a consequence of it – were meant to have marked the end of an era of runaway “turbocapitalism”. It never came close to happening. The crash was a crisis of capitalism but not the crisis of capitalism. As Lenin observed, there is “no such thing as an absolutely hopeless situation” for capitalism, and so we discovered again. Instead, the greatest burden of the period of fiscal retrenchment that followed the crash was carried by the poorest in society, those most directly affected by austerity, and this in turn has contributed to a deepening distrust of elites and a wider crisis of governance.

Where are we now and in which direction are we heading?

Some of the contributors to this special issue believe that we have reached the end of the “neoliberal” era. I am more sceptical. In any event, the end of neoliberalism, however you define it, will not lead to a social-democratic revival: it looks as if, in many Western countries, we are entering an age in which centre-left parties cannot form ruling majorities, having leaked support to nationalists, populists and more radical alternatives.

Certainly the British Labour Party, riven by a war between its parliamentary representatives and much of its membership, is in a critical condition. At the same time, Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership has inspired a remarkable re-engagement with left-wing politics, even as his party slumps in the polls. His own views may seem frozen in time, but hundreds of thousands of people, many of them young graduates, have responded to his anti-austerity rhetoric, his candour and his shambolic, unspun style.

The EU referendum, in which as much as one-third of Labour supporters voted for Brexit, exposed another chasm in Labour – this time between educated metropolitan liberals and the more socially conservative white working class on whose loyalty the party has long depended. This no longer looks like a viable election-winning coalition, especially after the collapse of Labour in Scotland and the concomitant rise of nationalism in England.

In Marxism Today’s “New Times” issue of October 1988, Stuart Hall wrote: “The left seems not just displaced by Thatcherism, but disabled, flattened, becalmed by the very prospect of change; afraid of rooting itself in ‘the new’ and unable to make the leap of imagination required to engage the future.” Something similar could be said of the left today as it confronts Brexit, the disunities within the United Kingdom, and, in Theresa May, a prime minister who has indicated that she might be prepared to break with the orthodoxies of the past three decades.

The Labour leadership contest between Corbyn and Owen Smith was largely an exercise in nostalgia, both candidates seeking to revive policies that defined an era of mass production and working-class solidarity when Labour was strong. On matters such as immigration, digital disruption, the new gig economy or the power of networks, they had little to say. They proposed a politics of opposition – against austerity, against grammar schools. But what were they for? Neither man seemed capable of embracing the “leading edge of change” or of making the imaginative leap necessary to engage the future.

So is there a politics of the left that will allow us to ride with the currents of these turbulent “new times” and thus shape rather than be flattened by them? Over the next 34 pages 18 writers, offering many perspectives, attempt to answer this and related questions as they analyse the forces shaping a world in which power is shifting to the East, wars rage unchecked in the Middle East, refugees drown en masse in the Mediterranean, technology is outstripping our capacity to understand it, and globalisation begins to fragment.

— Jason Cowley, Editor 

Tom Kibasi on what the left fails to see

Philip Collins on why it's time for Labour to end its crisis

John Harris on why Labour is losing its heartland

Lisa Nandy on how Labour has been halted and hollowed out

David Runciman on networks and the digital revolution

John Gray on why the right, not the left, has grasped the new times

Mariana Mazzucato on why it's time for progressives to rethink capitalism

Robert Ford on why the left must reckon with the anger of those left behind

Ros Wynne-Jones on the people who need a Labour government most

Gary Gerstle on Corbyn, Sanders and the populist surge

Nick Pearce on why the left is haunted by the ghosts of the 1930s

Paul Mason on why the left must be ready to cause a commotion

Neal Lawson on what the new, 21st-century left needs now

Charles Leadbeater explains why we are all existentialists now

John Bew mourns the lost left

Marc Stears on why democracy is a long, hard, slow business

Vince Cable on how a financial crisis empowered the right

David Miliband on why the left needs to move forward, not back

This article first appeared in the 22 September 2016 issue of the New Statesman, The New Times