Return to: Home | Politics | UK Politics

Stripping the gloss off Reading

Paul Gittings

Published 09 May 2008

Labour's Paul Gittings reports on how just seven days after his party was celebrating a rare glimmer of sunshine in Reading a defection has rather put a cloud over things

It’s the most overworked cliché, but as Harold Wilson famously observed a week is a long time in politics and it has taken less than seven days for a little of the gloss to have been stripped off our excellent results in the local elections for Reading last week.

Again bucking the national trend, we held on to key marginal seats, including in my own Minster ward, to form the largest party on the unitary authority with 20 seats to 18 for the Tories and eight for the Lib-Dems.

This was particularly sweet because David Cameron had visited Reading and expressed his confidence that the Conservatives would be running Reading come May 2.

But the dust had barely settled on the ballot boxes when we suffered a high-profile defection as former mayor Tony Jones announced he had left the Labour whip to continue as an ‘independent’ councillor.

Only Tony really knows the reason why he came to this decision, but a cursory glance at his web site reveals his unease at the failure to hold a referendum on the European Treaty, disappointment over the police pay award and condemnation of the 10p tax rate abolition.

So in as many words, we are not ‘Labour’ enough, which is a common refrain of departing members and one of the reasons that CLPs around the country are fighting elections with an ever-dwindling and under-motivated activist base.

In Tony's case, I suspect that self-promotion and a perceived slight from the leadership in some long-forgotten wrangle over committee chairs may also have played a part, but we are where we are and I hope that come crucial council votes that he does not abandon his socialist principles.

Because even he must acknowledge that the Labour-run council has been a progressive force, the first to give free passes to pensioners, keeping the award-winning local bus company, of which he has been the chairman, under public control, likewise our housing stock, protecting social care for the elderly in contrast to our Tory neighbours, and re-generating the town with developments such as The Oracle shopping centre.

Which is why the electorate in Reading just about stuck by us last week to give us cause for optimism in the wake of Labour's worst local election results since 1967.

Ours were not the only good results for Labour in the Thames Valley, with Slough being won back and gains in Oxford, while in the hysteria of Boris Johnson's victory over Ken Livingstone it escaped most commentators that Labour's results in the assembly elections were creditable as well.

The notoriously low turnout in local elections make them a poor indicator of general election results, we all remember the poll tax disasters for the Tories in 1990 locals but victory for John Major in 1992, so it is too early just yet to be writing Gordon Brown's political epitaph.

And based on the Reading experience, I believe we can take heart that when voters are forced to make a real choice on who is representing them, rather than a using their vote as a protest, or not voting at all, they will stick with Labour.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

SRJohn
10 May 2008 at 11:17

Mr.Gittings please stop living in your dreamworld and get real. Looking for another job will be good advice for Labour MP's.Labour have used and abused the people for too long and living in denial and shouting extra loud that Labour could win again is absolute fantasy. The panic amoung Labour and it's supporters is illustrated everywhere. 2010 cannot come soon enough! John Haimes, Glos

Roland Baker
10 May 2008 at 18:50

So Tony Jones could not make up his mind whether to defect to the BNP, UKIP or the Respect Coalition? So he could have been "Schizophrenic Labour Peoples' Party"? I call this an opportunist.

Paul Gittings is looking for a triumph of hope over expectation if he cannot blame Broon's contempt for working people for the losses on local election day.

Bendy Wendy clearly wants her distance from Broon and Paul Gittings should ask why.

adrianwindisch
12 May 2008 at 18:48

You wouldnt know from his writing that Labour has lost controll in Reading. A few more years of such 'sucess' and they wont have any Cllrs left.

Cllr Tony Jones
15 May 2008 at 15:51

I fear that Paul Gittings has given an entirely false impression of the state of the Labour Party in Reading ("Stripping the gloss off Reading" 9 May).

His claim that I resigned the Labour whip on Reading Council - or as he puts it "defected" - a week after the local elections is simply untrue. I resigned the week before, a fact known to the party leadership and MP. I did not make the matter public until after the Labour Group was told officially, which in Reading where councillors often learn of decisions through the newspapers before being informed by colleagues, was quite an achievement. So the repeated claims that the group stood at 20 after the elections was always bogus.

This arrogant distortion of the facts echoes the sloppy organisation of Reading Labour Party. If Paul wants to pin the loss of Labour control of Reading Council (which he omitted to mention) and the "ever dwindling and under motivated activist base" on me, then it shows just how out of touch things have got.

However, I know that Paul likes a sporting challenge, so I will wager 10p with him - yes, 10p - that his political master, Martin Salter MP, can not win in Reading West at the next general election. But the real bet is that Martin will not even stand, choosing instead to cut and run when the election is called. Or is that putting a cloud over things Paul?

Tony Jones

Independent Councillor for Battle Ward,

at the heart of the Oxford Road in West Reading.

www.cllrtonyjones.com

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Should we build new nuclear power plants?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker