Registered user login:

Clegg wins Lib Dem contest

Lynne Featherstone

Published 18 December 2007

Lynne Featherstone, who ran Chris Huhne's campaign for leader, gives her reaction to Nick Clegg's victory

Not my week! First X-Factor's Leon and now Nick! Seriously though – well done to Nick. Commiserations to my brave candidate Chris – who fought a phenomenal campaign. And before I turn to Nick, let me first give credit to Chris for his superb campaigning.

When the going got tough – as it did – Chris did not lose his cool or hit out in the way so many do. The measure of this man is his hunger, his energy, his temperament and his determination. At the start I said Chris has the cojones. Not half he has!

However, he lost and Nick won – and the quality of Chris’s campaign means that Nick’s victory over that reflects well on Nick. I suspect that Nick found winning much harder than he expected at the start of the campaign – but if he has come out of the campaign a tougher and more seasoned campaigner (and I know I did each time I ran in party selections for rather less high profile posts) – then that is all to the good for the party and our future.

Nick’s direction, verve, energy and messages are what will now be key to driving the party forward to success. This contest has been about our future – and the point of wanting the crown is not just to wear it – but what Nick does with it. He has got to deliver on the promises he made – to be anti-establishment and to deliver principled radicalism and to challenge the cosy consensus of the stagnant, old-fashioned, two-party politics further and faster.

Those are shared aims across both leadership campaigns – so I have no doubt that the whole party will be wishing Nick luck, and working hard to help him deliver those aims.

Today begins a new era for Liberal Democracy. This is a break with the past and a mandate to change the way politics is done. We are at a critical point in our trajectory in British politics. We need more seats to deliver more Liberal Democrat policies with a bigger and louder voice!

Of course, the real problem is that in the next election we will be focused on by the media probably solely on who we will get into bed with if there is a hung Parliament. I say ignore all that crap and fight to win. If the maths delivers such a verdict – then we should respect that outcome and deal with it when it arises, always doing that which will see the maximum number of our policies and beliefs enacted.

But we should also remember (and remind the media!) that a hung Parliament would raise questions for both Brown and Cameron on how they would act: so each time a journalist asks about a hung Parliament, we should perhaps politely promise to give them an answer – until after they have run their stories about Brown and Cameron’s answers first!

Meanwhile, we must raise our membership; make sure that we will have a more diverse representation in the elected positions at every level of office; champion the key issues of fairness and greenness; and stand up for and fight for freedom against the over-weaning, authoritarian centralist proposition of New Labour and expose the vacuous poverty of Cameron and his Conservatives.

All of this is underpinned by our belief in a liberal society: tolerant people living in peace freely; caring about those who cannot take care of themselves; looking after our planet and the future; being honourable in our international responsibilities and eschewing the corrosive seduction of the ‘it’s business – that’s how the world works’ school.

So – congratulations to Nick for winning this leadership contest – and now let’s work together to win more power for that which we all believe in!

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

11 comments from readers

Timelord
18 December 2007 at 15:58

Any one got any ideas, what is it that the LibDems believe in???

Colonel Blimp
18 December 2007 at 16:23

I believe it's free love. They certainly couldn't charge for it...

taghioff.info
18 December 2007 at 18:11

Perhaps pluralistic democracy with some level of voter choice...

Cybertiger
18 December 2007 at 18:34

"Perhaps pluralistic democracy with some level of voter choice..."

I shall vote, 1,2,3 for STV at the next election ... and put the LibDems as my first choice.

Carl Jones
19 December 2007 at 20:15

Please note the first two comments. Today it was much the same on BBC Radio 5 Live. I couldn`t believe the people they let phone in under the pretext of being "Joe-Public". It was clear that these eager callers were from Tory and Neocon Labour ranks. Both parties desperate to avoid a hung Parliament...afterall, the Freemason Liberal elite have already despatched two leaders, but now it could have back-fired on them. Thatcher and Blair were both NWO parasites. Clegg could be another, but a hung parliament would wreck the NWO agenda....just imagine the huge false flag terror events they`d have to sanction in order to move forward.lol

Derek Bennett
21 December 2007 at 13:06

What voter choice? The Lib Dem's (especially Clegg) can't wait to hand over the whole country, our democracy and sovereignty to the EU. Mind you, by the time they do form a government (if ever) the Labour Party and Tories between them will have given it all away, anyway. Under EU rule there is no voter choice, we will have to keep voting until we vote the way the EU approves then there will be no more voting.

paulwalteruk
22 December 2007 at 10:27

What do the LibDems believe in? Try liberalism and democracy for starters. With the current government those two concepts are in many ways distant memories. You only have to look at Clegg's firm stand on ID cards to see an example of the liberal agenda he is putting forward.

Derek Bennett - that's nonsense.

Derek Bennett
22 December 2007 at 15:46

paulwalteruk has proved my point, the Lib Dems talk about being against I.D. cards on one hand, whilst promoting the EU on the other. Yet the very reason we are having these 'Big Brother' police state I.D. cards imposed upon us is because the EU wants a 'Common I.D. card'. I dont see the Lib Dems as either liberal or democratic. Ironically, the only political party which promotes liberal and democratic values is the one party that wants Britain to leave the EU - the UK Independence Party.

Roland Baker
22 December 2007 at 20:53

Regrettably the wrong man won. Chris Huhne had the necessary skills and experience to take over from Sir Menzies Campbell and match Vince Cable. Nick Clegg does not. He is the epitome of the ant-skills culture and lack of ambition that besets the UK.

The LibDems have always excelled in local politics close to the people. Regrettably in Luton, where I live, they have been a notorious failure as they have in Milton Keynes.

The LibDems in Luton were hounded from office for waste, incompetence and failure in a town where Labour have truly lost the plot. Will Clegg put LibDems on the map? I believe he will wipe them off it.

My mind could be changed by how he responds to the complaint about LibDems in Luton that he will now receive from me.

disowned
01 January 2008 at 19:28

from: disowned

what should liberal democrats stand for?

Champion the key issues of fairness

AND

to be anti-establishment and to deliver principled raodicalism ,,,,,( and expose actions which are violation of commitments made by government to its own citizen) really ! / ?

Try liberalism and democracy for starters:--

a liberal society: tolerant people living in peace freely; caring about those who cannot take care of themselves;

The core h e r e is EQUAL RIGHTS (human/social) from which the above factors are derived. To stand up for these also means standing up for the cause of Equality which is the bedrock on which democrascy is built----without it democracy becomes hollow.

The previous few leaders have flatly refused to take up such issues or simply did not acknowledge the communication sent to them, what great leadership!!!

Would either Nick Clegg OR Chris Huhne

have the courage of conviction to stand up and take up iusses of principles such as these ?

As these make the foundation stone of a just and humane society which is prerequisite of a truly liberal democratic partysociety/nation OR WILL THEY BE LIKE THE THREE PREVIOUS LEADERS. ?

gnuneo
04 January 2008 at 21:37

and what was his first policy comment?

parole for good behaviour should be ended. Bloody great that one, so there is no point in prisoners behaving well, studying, preparing for life outside etc - because it won't do jack squat. for your term.

so we now have two centre right parties (actually, very little centre, but who wants to admit we are run by fascists?), and the new leader of the 3rd party immediately aims for the further right position.

f*cking great lib-dems, REALLY great choice.

watch your votes plummet in the coming year, and if you have any sense left at all, you'll get rid of him well before the next election, and choose a leader who is more than "camoron without the charm".

but you won't though, because you're a bunch of spineless, weak-bellied no-hopers, who have freely chosen a 'Kerry' who is possibly even more unlikeable than the other two main party leaders.

damn - waaay to go lib-dems, it must take a lot of effort to be this goddamned stupid.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Lynne Featherstone

Lynne Featherstone is LibDem MP for Hornsey & Wood Green and is her party's spokeswoman on Youth and Equality.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?