Registered user login:

Trade Unions

Brendan Barber

Published 14 May 2007

TUC chief Brendan Barber gives his view on the state of the trade union movement after 10 years of Tony Blair

Any union leader during the dark days of Thatcherism would have leapt at a chance to live the last ten years.

Mass unemployment is no longer deliberate. The minimum wage has gone from left field to commonsense. Union membership has stopped falling. There are new rights at work, many flowing from signing Europe's Social Chapter.

New campaigns not even dreamed of during the Tory years have been launched and won, such as family friendly rights, employers' compulsory pensions contributions and a role for unions in delivering skills.

And while relations between a Labour PM and the unions are never easy, at least there is a relationship - with regular access and real influence.

But even allowing that unions will always press for more, there is a real sense of missed opportunities and some wrong policy directions. Rather than working with staff, public service reform has too often become something done to public servants rather than with them. And despite real help for the working poor, there is an indifference to the gross inequalities now made worse by both boardroom greed and exploitation of vulnerable workers.

So much better than what went before, but it could have been even better.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Brendan Barber

Brendan Barber is General Secretary of the Trades Union Congress

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?