The Crimson Petal and the White (BBC2)
There is a stench of hypocrisy in a new adaptation
By Rachel Cooke Published 07 April 2011I'll tell you one thing for nothing: that Michel Faber, he ain't no Charles Dickens. Luckily, though, on the telly, where a decent director and a fine bunch of actors can make the ersatz seem magically authentic (and vice versa), this matters not a jot - and the BBC's adaptation of Faber's bloated novel The Crimson Petal and the White (Wednesdays, 9pm) turns out to be a compelling thing: vivid, nasty and rank with the stench of hypocrisy. Perfect for our times, you might say. As I watched, my disbelief tired of suspending itself only once: when William Rackham (quite superbly played by Chris O'Dowd) told his father that his wife, Agnes, found the visits of her creepy doctor "stressful". Did the Victorians use the word "stressful"? I think not.
The series is filmed mostly in the semi-dark and the camera lurches drunkenly so that, sometimes, we see only parts of the protagonists: sunken eyes, filthy hands, pale thighs. I suppose this is to remind us that the prostitutes who comprise half the story's cast have chopped their bodies into pieces, metaphorically speaking; while one part is sold for a couple of shillings, another (the brain, dextrous fingers) can be up to something quite different. But it also adds to the general sense of malady. Victorian London, teeming and filthy, is deathly sick and so are its inhabitants. Agnes (Amanda Hale), locked in her grand house with the pervy Dr Curlew (Richard E Grant), is as pale and shiny as soap; Sugar (Romola Garai), lurking in her room at Mrs Castaway's (Gillian Anderson), is as mottled and grey as pewter.
By the end of part one, things were set up very nicely. The aspiring writer Rackham, having bedded Sugar, the city's most alluring and elusive prostitute, has returned to the family business - perfume - with renewed, er, vim. At home, his sickly wife is still resisting Curlew's efforts to have her sent to an asylum. Sugar, having hooked William good and proper, has taken a hansom out to his villa and, gazing at it from a corner, has been mistaken by Agnes - ha! - for her guardian angel, come at last. And Mrs Castaway? (Oh, how I love Gillian Anderson - so sly, so convincing - in this role.) She is busy with her découpage. Scissors, paper and a heart of stone: that's her in one, really.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


5 comments
What?! Surely you can all do better than this.
I find myself at a loss. Ms Cooke, Faber may be no Charles Dickens, but you, madam, are no critic.
I don't disagree that the Faber book could have benefited from a slightly more draconian editor, but I find it offensive that you dismiss it so blithely.
Your review of the television series is haphazard, flighty and, frankly, unintelligent.
By using a phenomenon called the Internet, I have found out in little more than five seconds that the word 'stressful' was coined in 1853. Why, Rachel, am I doing your work for you?
Why have you used the word 'hypocrisy'? What hypocrisy? What does this article even mean?! The only hypocrisy I can think of is that which we see in retrospect, hardly interesting or notable in today's self-referential culture.
This is one of the most cursory articles I've ever read.
This miniseries is a masterpiece. Although clever, your synopsis is inaccurate in more ways than I care to point out. You're hot though.