Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

Civilisation: Is the West History?

Oh for the days of the fusty media don.

Civilisation: Is the West History?
Channel 4
Wonders of the Universe
BBC2

When I worked on my student newspaper two decades ago, we once put together a special supplement - Dons, we called it, imaginatively - about the weird and wonderful teaching staff of the university. It was super-interesting but it wasn't the, er, sexiest magazine we'd ever produced. Among many other words one might have used to describe the fellows inside were: crusty, dusty, musty, tweedy, hairy and beaky. There were plenty of bad teeth, comb-overs and sweaters that looked like they'd been knitted with puy lentils.

Do such peculiar birds still exist? Of course. Sadly, though, one catches sight of the Lesser Bearded Don in the media only rarely these days. He will appear in a Newsnight or Panorama "package" on the grounds of his expertise but for two minutes max, because (the producers think) who wants to stare at some whiskery old guy with hummus in his teeth for longer than that? In 2011, the hair of a don on TV must be on his head, not his face, and if he is in possession of a knitted tie at all, it will come from Paul Smith and be worn ironically. When he is on screen, he will not use jargon, or even words of more than three syllables. Nor will he mutter. He will sound more movie voice-over artiste than lecturer. His theories will be grand and sweeping and, as he expounds them, he will stand on top of some far-off glacier or sky-scraper, not in front of a bookshelf.

Step forward Professors Niall Ferguson and Brian Cox, both of whom have big new series on the telly. Ferguson's is being billed as Niall Ferguson's Civilisation (Sundays, 8pm), as if he invented progress all by himself, and tells the story of the rise and imminent fall of the west. The tidy-bottomed historian's argument is that China will soon be The Greatest in economic terms, just as it was 500 years ago. And how did Europe, dark, dirty and plague-ridden, rise up and beat the east, home of gunpowder, ink, matches and suspension bridges? Ferguson says it was all down to six "Killer Apps": competition, science, democracy, medicine, consumerism and the work ethic. Each week, he expounds on one of these "apps"; how Europe used it over the course of the past five centuries and how China is using it right now (or not, in the case of democracy).

What do I think of his thesis? It seems fair enough. The trouble lies in his delivery, not his message. It's not only that his appropriation of the word "app" is so silly. Ferguson, a Scot, has spent years in the US, and this has left him sounding like the bastard child of Loyd Grossman and Alex Salmond. His tone is madly over-emphatic and he never talks to anyone else, with the result that his films have no light and shade (like China, this is a series in which dissent apparently does not exist). The constant movement - one minute he's on a bridge in Beijing, the next a lift in the Lloyds of London building - is exhausting and distracting. Add to all this that most of us are thinking about the Middle East right now, rather than China, and the result is a series that performs like a powerful sleeping draught. It had me yawning like Bagpuss.

Over on BBC2, we have the gorgeous, pouting particle physicist Brian Cox and his Wonders of the Universe (Sundays, 9pm). Cox also does a lot of travelling - Peru, Costa Rica, Namibia; his air miles must be fantastic by now - and I'm sure this makes a nice change from Manchester. But while he wins the competition on the "big theme" front (where Ferguson dishes up only "civilisation", Cox plates the entire universe), his series is every bit as dull. The script is laughably banal, and rather desperate. As the old Steve Martin joke goes: some have a way with words, and some... not have way. Every other word is "profound" and every other sentence begins with the word "interestingly", and the net result is that, after a while, one begins to suffer a kind of profundity-interest overload, whose chief symptoms are heavy eyelids and a deep longing for the next episode of Masterchef. l

“Civilisation" runs until 10 April and “Wonders of the Universe" until 27 March

14 comments

Captain Sensible's picture

It has nothing to do with the West but since the turd world has been given equal status along with its billions of excrement producing, bio diversity denigraters, the equation has changed!

JMac's picture

Given that Rachel's TV career began and ended with appearing on some pitiful Gordon Ramsay show, you have to cut her some slack for "reviews" such as this one if they contain several failed attempts at biting humour.
Many viewers appreciate Cox and Ferguson's specialist knowledge and their ability to make it accessible, and they deservedly have major TV series as a result. Rachel has no discernible specialist knowledge, appeared on a very poor TV show, and a TV presenting career didn't follow.
I doubt Cox and Ferguson (if they're even aware of Rachel and her TV reviews) would particularly care what she thought, but as they're doing what she attempted and failed at, and as she's left having to write about them in a very small-circulation magazine, you don't have to be a psychologist to detect the bitterness where a review should be.

Glasewgian's picture

There is a perfectly other explanation for the dullness; that is, Rachel Cooke, like Rachel met Harry, is completely devoid of any intelligence and hence utter inability to understand what Dr. Ferguson or Dr. Cox are saying. Civilizing indeed.

?'s picture

I'm sorry but the use of 'app' is utterly ridiculous and wrong in every way. There are no excuses.

ted harvey's picture

“Ferguson, a Scot, has spent years in the US, and this has left him sounding like the bastard child of Loyd Grossman and Alex Salmond.”

Just how many flimsy but irritating little prejudices and lazy stereotypes are there in that one clutch?

It sort of sums up the risible pointlessness of the whole thing; it is presumably meant to be a programme review?

Just exactly how does the New Statesman get around to picking such a clearly incapable, failed c-rate TV person to do such a review?

Hugh Markey's picture

We must be grateful for Neil Ferguson as television programme presenter and for his histories as printed matter. Some ideas expressed and accepted by him remind me of Lancelot Hogben and other leftists in their mid-twentieth century works.
Admittedly, `Neil had gone a bit cyberpunk and is applying electronic argot to historical events which may not be applicable. Still - interesting.
The freedom of necessity - possibly I first encountered this phrase in a work of J B Bernal's - seems to be the reason why the West developed with so much geometric velocity.
The trade routes to the East were under the control of Islamic forces. The voyages of exploration were merely attempts to circumvent this barrier. And the West needed the inventions of the East to make these voyages and to increase the productivity of its limited labour force.

adam.sheldon's picture

Dear me. The comments column here seems to be a playground for trolls (or possibly smurfs), attacking the article's author and completely failing to engage with the points she makes. I've generally found Rachel Cooke's reviews well-written and perceptive: this one is no exception. Cox's programme, in particular, is as vacuous as the awesome immensity of space its portentous script and foreground music attempt to evoke. The factual content of each episode could be stated in two minutes. It's a wasted opportunity - and yet another example of the kindergarten level of documentary presentation US co-production seems to demand ("Horizon" is now barely worth watching).

Trotwood's picture

Being a mere layman, I've found Cox's 'Universe' and Ferguson's 'Civilisation' more than interesting. Maybe you should come down here with me?

Atticus's picture

agree with most of the comments, the shows are good and accessible, especially WotU. The critiic trying to hard to be critical/funny. Relax and enjoy the shows.

captain grimes's picture

Just checking in to cast my vote for the Cooke/Sheldon ticket. Actually, on the basis of his contribution I'd also vote for Mr Sheldon to take over the reviewing slot.

The only presenter-led series I recall enjoying was fronted by the great Brian Sewell, who hated and resisted the role he was called upon to play.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets