Boardwalk Empire
HBO's lavish costume drama doesn't live up to the hype.
By Rachel Cooke Published 10 February 2011Boardwalk Empire, Sky Atlantic
It's hard to review a show as hyped as HBO's Boardwalk Empire (began 1 February, 9pm). Fall in line with the heavy breathers - their excitement has been stirred because the series was created by Terence Winter, who wrote and produced The Sopranos, and one of its executive producers is Martin Scorsese, who also directed the first episode - and you feel like a sheep, baa-ing with the flock. Air your disappointment, on the other hand, and you risk sounding even more predictable: yet another cynical clever clogs, going after a classy series just for the hell of it. All I can tell you is that my disappointment is great and sincere.
I watched the first two episodes in a state of mild interest - it's hard not to be a little bit interested in anything starring Steve Buscemi and his amazing, un-American teeth - but I never came close to feeling properly engrossed. Boardwalk Empire's big problem is its naked ambition. In television, as in life, money is no substitute for love, and the show's lavish attention to period detail - it cost $20m to make the first episode alone - is distancing and oddly inert. It is impossible to forget, even for a second, that the action is taking place on a set. In Mad Men, Don and Peggy do not just wear their costumes; they inhabit them. In Boardwalk Empire, everyone looks as if the costume department finished with them seconds before.
The series is set in Atlantic City, New Jersey, during Prohibition. Buscemi, his eyes rolling like marbles, plays Enoch "Nucky" Thompson, the city's de facto ruler. Nucky's power is absolute, being both political (he is the city treasurer) and criminal (he is a gangster, and his tentacles extend everywhere). In his hands, the Prohibition laws - whatever he might say about them to the rapt voters of the temperance movement - are meaningless.
Atlantic City is a playground and visitors to it will pay even more for moonshine than they did for the legal stuff. Nucky will soon be printing money. Does he have any weaknesses? Perhaps. Far below him on the tacky rungs of the city's social ladder is Margaret Schroeder (Kelly Macdonald), an Irish immigrant on whom he appears to take pity - if you can call bumping off her violent drunk of a husband pity. Also, there is Jimmy Darmody (Michael Pitt), his protégé. Darmody is clearly going to be an important character. He has ambitions that could cause trouble for Nucky and, as a veteran of the trenches, his feelings have been usefully cauterised: Atlantic City is a cinch after Flanders. But Pitt's performance is strangely underpowered and the character's backstory is sketched too thinly. He should be haunting but all he is right now is pasty.
Who will prove to be Nucky's nemesis? Will it be Margaret, or Jimmy, or Nelson van Alden (Michael Shannon), the creepy federal agent on Nucky's trail? (In part two, van Alden sniffs a ribbon that has fallen from Margaret's hair; it seems that he isn't motivated only by a belief that whiskey is the work of the devil.) I don't know. But finding out could take a while. Encouraged by the good reviews the show received in the US, its ratings and its performance at award season, HBO has already commissioned a second series. What's more, the real-life character on whom Nucky is apparently based ruled Atlantic City for 30 years.
Is it worth sticking with the show? I can't answer this question, either, although I'd be lying if I said that the preview DVDs of episodes three, four and five were calling to me from the top of my television set. This series is a kind of Sopranos-lite: all the killings and the violence, without any of the psychology. There are strange sights that intrigue momentarily (along the boardwalk, next door to the place selling saltwater taffy, is a freakish shop full of incubators where visitors can see "real-life premature babies!") and Buscemi's performance is, as usual, marvellous (watching his expression move from vulpine to melancholic to long-suffering and back again is like watching a magician working a pack of cards).
But these things are not enough. A series this big and this expensive should act like a net. It should catch and hold its audience, not allow it to drift slowly away.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


10 comments
Trust me, give it a few more episodes. It is a bit too slow and there are a few too many characters but by episode 4, it gets better.By the end of the season, you'll be glad you stuck with it. Personally I can't wait until the next season starts!
Boardwalk Empire is simply great. In my opinion it is the greatest period series in the last decade. İt is much more alive than Mad Man. I cannot wait for the 2nd season.
I agree with Christine. I have seen the series in full and it is without the doubt the most fascinating TV series I have ever seen. The first few episodes are slow for those without knowledge of the era because it centres upon characters reminiscent of the 1920s and not 2010s.
However after episode 3, the only people who will not like this show, do so because they have a "moral" problem with it. The writing is top notch and the acting by certain members of the cast is captivating.
This show is anything but uninspiring. Season 2 will be a great success just as this was1
Dear Rachel Cooke,
I find it a bit strange that you've decided to write this review at all after just watching 2 episodes. I've seen the full season 1 and as you can't judge the book by it's cover you can't judge this TV drama after 1 or 2 episodes. I just can't wait for season 2!!!
I gradually drifted away as the series went on. It is all very expensive-looking and lit like a 1970's commercial. But it doesn't keep my interest as there is not a single character you can care anything about and each episode is just a series of generally un-related scenes. Also, it's a bit like they haven't decided whether to make it a fiction or keep true to the events. Changing the name from Johnson to Thomson is indicative of this. The only character I like is the German butler - a bit of a Manuel, he has the only humourous lines. Very disappointing.
Funny how the only people who don't like it are people who haven't seen the whole series :P A review after TWO EPISODES? Please, everybody was thinking the same thing after the second episode, it's after episode 5 that everything completely flipped around. Even the Sopranos didn't have great episodes all the time.
I'll admit it, the Walking Dead is really good, but it doesn't have nearly the amount of symbolism and hidden themes Boardwalk has.
As for season two, the series can only get better from here. The writers are introducing three more characters, including Bugsy Siegel, AND they're making one of the best characters on the show a series regular.
"Doesn't live up to the hype?" Jeez... It's obvious you've only watched two episodes...
It's everything Gangs of New York should have been, hopefully it runs all the way through to the Great Depression and keeps making references to contemporary issues.
I've just watched the entire series and have to say it has been one-paced throughout. Can't see how anyone could be gushing about it. I'd have a look at the next batch, but more in hope than expectation.
Basically a 12 episode scene-setter.
I have waded through 4 episodes now and I have to disagree with those who praise it. The pace has hardly varied from its turgid beginning and frankly it fails in most respects as drama (the vertically challenged Al Capone proving the only exceptio.
What is quite startling is just how exploitative this series is. Excepting Kelly Mcdonald, virtually every other actress has been required to strip. This series seems to be running to a quota of T&A. Not acceptable frankly and borderline offensive.
I was losing the will to live after 2 episodes and almost deleted 3 and 4 from Sky+ but I am glad I didnt as it is definately getting more 'layered' and interesting. I have yet to be convinced it is the work of genius that it is touted as, but I will give it the benefit of the doubt.
I too wish it wasnt quite so 'clean' looking and had some of the gritty realism of Malicks 'Days of Heaven' set in the same era.
One thing is for sure, in the battle of the first episode big shot Directors, Frank Darabont wins hands down over Scorcese for his opener of 'The Walking Dead'.
Post new comment