Return to: Home | Culture | Television

Darkness doesn’t always mean authenticity

Rachel Cooke

Published 05 March 2009

David Peace’s Yorkshire thrillers make fantastic TV but dubious history Red Riding Channel 4

Eddie Dunford (Andrew Garfield) is a journalist investigating the Ripper murders in 1970s Yorkshire

I had been looking forward to Channel 4’s adaptation of David Peace’s Red Riding quartet (Thursday nights from 5 March, 9pm) with a peculiar intensity – with excitement, but also with dread. I am two years younger than Peace and, like him, I grew up in Yorkshire during the Ripper years (the novels are about the county in the years 1974 to 1983). Peace has said that he remembers the taunts in the playground: “Your dad is the Ripper! No, your dad is the Ripper!” Well, I can tell you now that this is no false memory. We were haunted. He was among us, and he was going to get us. But who was he? I remember exactly how I felt when the police issued an identikit picture of the killer: the flip of my stomach, the crazy pricking of fear on my scalp; my father and my stepfather both had inky black beards. That’s how deeply the idea of him had lodged itself in my brain. When they eventually caught him in my home town, in a lovers’ lane (ha!), no one needed to say who it was that had been caught. “Him” was enough. Him. That’s who he was.

Why then did these films leave me cold? (I’ve cheated this week; I’ve seen all three.) It’s not that I don’t admire them hugely as movies, because I do. They are superbly directed, magnificently acted, brilliantly designed, cunningly written. They fit together, puzzle-like, only truly making sense once you’ve watched to the end (trust me: in episode two, the fog will lift). In my notebook, I’ve written down only two criticisms, and these sound nitpicky now that I repeat them: Rebecca Hall’s Yorkshire accent, which was as intermittent as the 1970s electricity supply, and how one character – Eddie Dunford, cub reporter – went to live in a motel. A motel? With a neon sign? In 1970s Yorkshire? We did not know such glamour!

It is years since we’ve seen investment of this kind, emotional and financial, in a British TV series, and you feel it in every scene. Hard to know, sometimes, whose face to watch: the star (my belief that Andrew Garfield is some kind of young genius is rapidly turning into a religion), or the supporting cast (Sean Harris as Bob Craven, a bent copper, is so repulsively convincing, you start to dream of a hot shower the moment he sidles into frame).

So, I think my real beef must be with David Peace himself. It’s not that his portrayal of Yorkshire upsets me – although, when you think about it, his belief that it was a uniquely violent place is just daft. In Red Riding, the characters toast one another with the words: “To the north, where we do what we want!” as if Yorkshire were Dodge City. Stodge City, more like. Could there have been a Lancashire Ripper, or a Lincolnshire Ripper? Of course, there could. Fred West came from Gloucestershire. No, it’s more that these fictions of his, now replayed on our screens, are based on events so brutish that I simply cannot understand why he feels the need to make them any nastier. Women and children butchered; a man wrongfully convicted of murder (in addition to the Ripper killings, Peace uses the wrongful conviction of Stefan Kiszko for the murder of Lesley Molseed in 1975). Are these things not bad enough? Not for Peace, they’re not, so he wraps them in a dirty blanket of police corruption and malpractice for good measure.

Yet Peter Sutcliffe was able to continue his grim work not as a result of police corruption; at play was something far more straightforward, and so more insidious, and more hateful, too – incompetence, shot through with misogyny. The police only really started taking Sutcliffe seriously once “innocent” women (that is, non-prostitutes) were being killed because, let’s face it, no one was going to worry about a load of dead whores. Why does Peace twist this? Doubtless his childhood is at work here, the black cloud of doom that hung over one boy’s playground stretching and growing in the adult mind’s-eye until it covers every aspect of establishment life. But perhaps it is also that, like some of the excitable male critics I’ve read this week, he has made the grave error of mistaking darkness for authenticity.

Pick of the week

CSI: Crime Scene Investigation
10 March, 9pm, Channel 5
Laurence Fishburne makes his debut in the hit US show.

Heston’s Medieval Feast
10 March, 9pm, Channel 4
Blumenthal, the whizz-kid chef, takes a step back into the past.

Horne and Corden
Starts 10 March, 10.30pm, BBC3
The lead men from Gavin and Stacey reunite for a sketch series.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

3 comments from readers

john j kelly
05 March 2009 at 22:28

It's facile to see David Peace's Red Riding trilogy with

an account of the Yorkshire ripper, nor is it necessarily

useful to see it as a faithful or unfaithful representation

of Yorkshire. It's an examination of the nature of evil,

police corruption, and murderous minds. I agree that

the TV series doesn't do this in anything like the depth

of the books, but as far as I'm aware, Peace didn't

write the screenplays, so you're wrong to attack him. I

lived in Leeds at that time. His depiction of the culture

of police corruption, brutality and unaccountability

(remember David Oluwale) and the misogyny of

Yorkie blokes is accurate. Sorry, Luv, you're out of

order.

JColliins
05 March 2009 at 23:16

Hi Rachel - this is a really good piece. I got a little antsy with it first cos I thought you were just going after the 'over-excitable' male critics, but having read around you are so right.

Brilliant acting in the film tonight though, I agree with you whole heartedly. And keep up your opinions for the next two episodes. I look forward to reading them.

Cobweb Eyes
06 March 2009 at 21:05

I watched Red Riding last night and thought it was very thin stuff indeed. The publicity said something about an occult history of 1970's Yorkshire which sounds great but the reality was a mish mash of Oh Lucky Man, Get Carter, Don't Look Now (great film but if I see another kid in a red anorak.....), Blue Velvet and Lost Highway - all of which were lazily/shamlessly referenced at some point. The plot seemed not to scramble above that old chestnut of young upstart reporter seeking to jump start his failing career getting in over his head before being manipulated by corrupt police for their own ends. After two hours nothing of any consequence had emerged.

The reviews have been full of 'greatest drama of the year' cooing this morning but it looked like adolescent lad stuff to me, especially when placed against the best of what America has to offer at the moment ie The Wire.

A shame, as there is a story there, its just that we don't seem to have the dramatists or film makers to deal with it.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Rachel Cooke

Rachel Cooke trained as a reporter on The Sunday Times. She is now a writer at The Observer. In the 2006 British Press Awards, she was named Interviewer of the Year.

Also by Rachel Cooke

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker