Return to: Home | Culture | Television

History's not what it used to be

Rachel Cooke

Published 22 January 2009

This documentary assumes little or no knowledge on the part of the viewer Christianity: a History Channel 4

Charisma-free: Michael Portillo brought neither expertise nor narrative verve to a spicy story

History's not what it used to be

I can't claim, by any stretch of the imagination, to be much of a Church historian, so it was with some surprise that I watched Michael Portillo's film about the conversion of the Emperor Constantine to Christianity early in the 4th century AD - perhaps the single most important moment in the Christian Church's two-thousand-year history - and learned not a thing.

Actually, this is not quite true. I learned that Michael Portillo, though perfectly adept at talking to camera while walking through ancient ruins, remains a charisma-free zone. Also, that he likes a nice pair of chinos, especially when matched with a dark blazer. But so far as Constantine and his clever and exceedingly slippery appropriation of the early Christians' faith goes, the only thing I know now that I didn't know before is that it is more than a little low-rent to call his biographer, Eusebius of Caesarea, his "spin doctor" in the hope that we, the viewers, will suddenly get all excited at how very, like, modern the big guy in Byzantium was. We will not. We will just feel patronised and irritated.

Why exactly Portillo was chosen to present this, the second film in Channel 4's supposedly weighty eight-part history of Christianity (Sundays, 7pm), is anyone's guess. He gamely tried to suggest that he'd landed the gig because he and Constantine have so much in common, but I wasn't buying this. That the good emperor was ever the politician, and that Portillo was, er, raised a Catholic (see: they are practically twins, albeit twins that were born some seventeen hundred years apart!) didn't seem to me to justify even remotely that the latter brought neither expertise nor narrative verve to what, in the right hands, is a pretty spicy story.

I cherish this period in Church history, for what's not to like? Alpha male (Constantine) takes a strange, heretic religion, some of whose followers like to sit atop pillars for years at a time, and makes it seem not just half-way normal, but sensible: a means, ultimately, of justifying everything from slave-owning to war-mongering. Spread the Good News, indeed (it was Constantine who got the Gospels copied and, more significantly, edited). Here, however, this whole revolutionary caboodle was reduced to a more than usually plodding collection of talking heads and dusty amphitheatres. A low point: to illustrate the febrile marketplace atmosphere of key pagan towns such as Ephesus pre-Christianity, Portillo could be seen hammily mock-bartering with a Turkish purveyor of tourist tat.

Like everyone, I am dying to see the last film in the series, which will be presented by Cherie Blair and is about the future of Christianity - will she be seen haranguing some friendly TV priest about the difficulties of diaphragms? I do hope so. However, Christianity: a History, only two parts in, is already well on its way to being a huge disappointment. The trouble is that it is so extraordinarily basic, taking so very little knowledge on the part of the viewer for granted; and also, rather than being authored by one engaging historian, it is presented by eight different and not-terribly-interesting "British personalities", including - this is so predictable, I could cry - Ann Widdecombe. (She gets to do the Reformation, and all I can say is that I do hope she will present it while sitting aloft a comfortable Puritan spike.)

Result? While the series may be vaguely handy for A-level religious studies students - assuming that Christianity is still on the syllabus, and it wouldn't surprise me at all if it wasn't - as controversial polemic goes, it is up there with your local parish magazine: a recipe for simnel cake and a list of poorly pensioners would be more gripping. This is not entirely the film-makers' fault. Perhaps they are simply more willing than I to accept that almost no one gets taught the Bible anymore - a fact that excludes them not from the Word (I don't believe in Him), but from fully understanding so much that is beautiful and enthralling: from our music, poetry and architecture, from all the things that make life more bearable.

Pick of the week

A Short Stay in Switzerland
25 January, 9pm, BBC1
Julie Walters plays Anne Turner, who ended her own life after being diagnosed with an incurable illness.

Generation Kill
25 January, 10pm, FX
From the creators of The Wire: a drama about the invasion of Iraq.

Chickens, Hugh and Tesco Too
26 January, 9pm, C4
Hugh FW's crusade against cruelty.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

swatantra nandanwar
23 January 2009 at 09:39

A fascinating dissection of Christianity. Did Constantine take over a minor religion and rebuild it in his own image? There can be no doubt about that, 'love thy neighbour' and 'turn the other cheek' were ditched and replaced by blood and thunder and conquest. Constantine destroyed gospels that reflected badly on him and brought back Sun worship, all under the guise of Christianity. Poverty was thrown aside and the Church accumulated wealth.

gnuneo
26 January 2009 at 21:37

christianity 4 beginners:

there was this bloke see, and he died for your sins before you were born, but he didn't actually die anyway, and it doesn't matter cos you're all born as sinners cos your parents had sex, and women are dirty see?

you can't have sex until you are married, and you can only marry someone when the Church allows you to, but thats ok cos sex is bad and shouldn't be enjoyed, cos women are dirty and stupid, and totally inferior to men, who wrote this book called "Book" in latin and claimed Gawd told them to.

any resemblance to pagan religions is cos somebody *almost* as powerful as this Gawd person was playing tricks, and if you don't agree with that - meet Mr Stake and pile of wood.

...but its all about Love, you see?

no?

sorry, it just blows the mind how utterly immature 'garden-variety' Christianity is, its like basing Wicca upon Harry Potter - a revised, *highly* edited version of HP that makes Voldemort into Gawd, and muggles into the permanently damned.

its hardly any wonder that the 'Church' needed to slaughter hundreds of thousands - if not millions - of people to prevent them questioning it.

and of course, as you say rachel - that was built into this Jewish cult when Constantine decided to use it to 'unite the Empire', the Roman Empire lacking any remaining good qualities that could still enthuse support from the populace. But then normal human lives were never important to Rome - or to Empires in general - and so-called Christianity has lived up to that principle in full measure.

perhaps the makers of the programme pulled their punches as they were worried the religious fanatics in 'an unnamed country' would take offence, and would threaten to "bomb the UK back to the Stone Age", as these devout Followers of Jesus tend to do to countries that annoy them.

secularism has its flaws, but the best thing about it is that we live in it - i pity the poor fools who live under theocracies, never able to be complete adults and question. :(

Taiping
04 February 2009 at 02:30

But most people don't know as much as Ms Cooke apparaently knows and they do not feel partronised when they are presented with a new "revelation". Indeed, people love conspiracy theories. Indeed an entire nation fell for one not very long ago, the US. And before that Germany. And before that, many, many others.

Still, I like the wording she chose for those of us who already know a thing or two about early church history and history in general, patronised and irritated.

gnuneo
04 March 2009 at 22:20

caught the show on a rerun, actually i have to admit i thought it was quite good - not only is Portillo comfortable in front of the camera, he manages to explain what may to those 'in the know' be pretty basic/obvious information, but to those who are not aware of the political machinations and underlying psychotic power-hungry despotism of the self proclaimed 'Church', i can imagine the show had some surprises up its sleeve - and he explains it fairly well, certainly better than Boris Johnson's rather chaotic presentations recently.

worth a watch, if only to see why so called 'Christianity' is not actually in the tradition of Judaism-Islam, but apart from the absolutism of monotheism, is pretty much nothing more nor less than a cynically created and manipulated religion purely to 'control the masses'.

paganism for cretins.

i shudder to imagine what the Druids thought of this bastardised and corrupt theocracy, but i am not the slightest bit surprised the 'Church' felt it needed to destroy any previous spiritual pathways in the lands and societies it conquered and destroyed.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Rachel Cooke

Rachel Cooke trained as a reporter on The Sunday Times. She is now a writer at The Observer. In the 2006 British Press Awards, she was named Interviewer of the Year.

Also by Rachel Cooke

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker