Registered user login:

The revolution will be televised

Rachel Cooke

Published 20 November 2008

A drama proves that England's radical past is something we should celebrate
The Devil's Whore
Channel 4

Rainsborough (Michael Fassbender) and Cromwell (Dominic West)

So, this is exciting. No sooner has Dominic West finished his work on the HBO cops-and-drugs-drama The Wire than he turns up as . . . Oliver Cromwell. I don't think of Cromwell often - though my father, a fan, owned an engraving of him which, at one time, used to hang above our breakfast table - but when I do, I picture him as stout and constipated-looking rather than the vision of saturnine sexiness that is Dominic West.

In fact, scratch "exciting": West's appearance in The Devil's Whore (Wednesdays, 9pm) is very disorientating. Here, he speaks in an approximation of Cromwell's Fenland burr which, like the Baltimore grunt he adopted for The Wire, I find rather hard to catch. Next week, I'm going to spend my whole time worrying that I'm about to miss his signing of Charles I's death warrant - Cromwell will apparently be seen agonising over this task, rather than jauntily dashing off his signature en route to finding himself a comfy spike on which to sit - simply because I cannot understand a word he says.

But never mind. Even if I do miss this crucial moment, it is going to be excellent watching Charles I (Peter Capaldi) shiveringly walking to the block. Capaldi is perfect as the king, from the loamy hollows of his eyes to the pretty patrician lilt of his voice. West excepted, this series is nothing if not well cast. There is something especially magnetic about Michael Fassbender's Thomas Rainsborough, a man we non-historians might describe as the radical's radical (he and his friend Cromwell are on different paths, though they do not yet know it). Fassbender's eyes are lit from within, like gelatinous fairy lights, a trick of physiology that sets him wonderfully free to underact.

I don't know which Leveller our heroine, a fictional character called Angelica Fanshawe (Andrea Riseborough), is going to end up copping off with now that her fey royalist husband has been executed by the king for his cowardice, but I, for one, sincerely hope that it is Rainsborough who ends up throwing his billowing shirt on the bedroom floor. Fassbender's charisma combined with the parched Puritanism of Rainsborough's character - "You blaspheme by giving the Son of God a birthday party," he announced to a group of hymn-singing royalists whose church his men attacked on Christmas morning - is hotter than the fires of hell themselves.

And what of the writing? It has taken Peter Flannery, who also brought us the peerless Our Friends in the North, 14 years to get this drama on screen: commissioning editors, he has said, don't go a bundle on Roundheads and Cavaliers any more. If true, I find this mystifying. Don't these young things in trainers remember By the Sword Divided, two long series of which the BBC screened in the early 1980s? I do - so well, I can still hum the theme tune. My hunch is that audiences love priest holes, laced corsets and horses cantering through oak forests.

Our grasp both of the precise chronology and of the endlessly shifting politics of the Civil War might be patchy, but this isn't to say that we don't appreciate the expansive drama of it all - or that we aren't willing to bask in the odd glory of the fact that we, the English, were the first to do the whole revolution thing. (I strongly disagree with Ronan Bennett, who recently wrote in the Guardian that "the English often seem embarrassed" about their radical past; across the country are swaths of people, from Quakers to trade unionists, who are more than proud, and Bennett should get out of London more, and meet them.)

Still, plotting these torrid years is complicated, and I'm not sure that Flannery has quite pulled it off. Angelica Fanshawe - what a name: is she originally from Ambridge? - is not so much a character as a device; it is her job to explain the whole damn mess to those who didn't pay attention at school, and what this means is that she is annoyingly ditzy. And then there is Edward Sexby (John Simm), who starts as a mercenary and ends as a radical, and whom Flannery has coughing up the worst macho clichés I've ever heard. I do hope it won't be him, old scarface, who ends up bedding Angelica.

Pick of the week

Einstein and Eddington
22 November, 9.10pm, BBC2
David Tennant and Andy Serkis star.

Survivors
23 November, 9pm, BBC1
A plague has decimated the population. Luckily, one bunch of egomaniacs has survived.

The Jacksons Are Coming
27 November, 9pm, Channel 4
What are some of the famous Five doing in Devon?

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

3 comments from readers

swatantra nandanwar
21 November 2008 at 15:58

He could have chosen a better title; its a tltle likely to attract the wrong crowd looking for a C17 romp and not the intelligentsia for such an important subject. But despite the Levellers, the Putney Debates crowd etc, England in the end rejected the Purtianism of Cromwell, and voted for foppery. Why? harles proved himself a canny Monarch and managed to promote Philantropy and Science as well as sire some bastard children.

gnuneo
23 November 2008 at 23:36

perhaps because Puritanism was boring and sucked? No drinking, dancing, drugs, free sex or other forms of fun and enjoyment?

bugger that for a joke. Why is it so often the case that 'social reformers', despite wanting to get rid of present tyranny, want to replace it with their own? (new-Labour take note).

might catch this series, if only to see how the writers portrayed the Radicalism back then. Though i must say Rachel, you haven't done much to inspire *male* sexual desires for viewers... is this the reciprocal female version of 'Loaded's media reviews? LOL ;)

LLC1983
25 November 2008 at 12:24

"My hunch is that audiences love priest holes, laced corsets and horses cantering through oak forests." i am 25 and am loving this series so far :)

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Rachel Cooke

Rachel Cooke trained as a reporter on The Sunday Times. She is now a writer at The Observer. In the 2006 British Press Awards, she was named Interviewer of the Year.

Read More

Vote!

Should the international community intervene in Gaza?