Registered user login:

Three cheers for the X factor

Rachel Cooke

Published 24 July 2008

What makes a man gay? The question, mercifully, is too complex to answer
The Making of Me
BBC1

Neat timing for the first part of The Making of Me (24 July, 9pm), in which the actor and singer John Barrowman tried to discover what made him gay (in a series of three episodes in which, each week, a different celebrity goes on "a mission to discover the source of their defining trait"). Is it his nature, or did that time his parents made him wear a bikini while on board the QE2 do something odd to his brain? In Canterbury, the Anglican bishops have been working themselves up into the usual frenzy about homosexuality, one so shrilly indignant that you do wonder whether the so-called traditionalists grew up with as many Barbies in their closets as Barrowman did. (This was my favourite scene, when he examined the contents of his childhood toy cupboard: it wasn't the number of dolls that made me smile, so much as their delightful condition; while my Sindys had matted hair and sluttishly torn skirts, his Barbies were catwalk-fresh and accessorised to an unnerving degree.)

Then again, the nature v nurture debate has always seemed to me to be a red herring. How a person got gay doesn't change the fact that they are gay, nor should it make any difference to how they are treated by the rest of us. Barrowman himself was desperate to prove that his sexuality is innate and not learned, but I was never really clear why. The truth, I suspect, is that he and his producers felt the need to bring drama to the answering of a question that was basically rather uninteresting: why did this successful man, who had a happy if camp childhood, grow up to form a loving partnership with another man rather than a woman? It isn't as if Barrowman is full of self-loathing. You might as well ask why Cath Kidston grew up to love floral prints.

Barrowman is likeable and wholesome, and definitely a nice-looking sort of a chap, but he did not strike me as the brightest sequin in the drawer: there was a certain lack of reflection in his responses to the tests he underwent and a definite blankness in his eyes when talking to scientists, which he covered up with lots of squealing and flirting ("What a pleasant surprise!" he said, on shaking the hand of a particularly hunky gene researcher). This got pretty wearying after a while, and it meant that the tests themselves - brain scans, chromosomal analyses, psychological observations - existed in a vacuum: no one ever asked whether it is not in any way dangerous to go down this road of trying to pin everything on genetics.

Luckily, the results were inconclusive. Barrowman - surprise - got most turned on by pictures of man-on-man action, but performed more like a heterosexual woman when it came to skills such as map-reading and word association. Oh yes, and he knew all the words to Abba's "Chiquitita" as a teenager. On the other hand, his genetic make-up - the bottom tip of his X chromosome - matched that of his brother, who is straight. It seems that some 50 per cent of what makes a man gay occurs in the womb, but the jury is still out as to what that might be. After that, any number of factors may be at work.

Barrowman found all this frustrating - he clung to that 50 per cent figure like Barbara Windsor to a set of hot curlers - but to me, this news came as a relief. These things are complicated, and I relish it: such complexity is what it means to be human. Besides, by this point, I was obsessed with something else about Barrowman - something freaky that has nothing to do with his sexuality. In everyday life, he has an American accent. However, when he talks to his Scottish parents, a weird thing happens, and when I say weird, I mean seriously scary. It's as if his body is suddenly taken over by the personality of an East Kilbride market-stall holder called Shona. No one commented on this, but I was mighty troubled by it. I began to expect his stomach to be ripped open and for a monster resembling Jimmy Krankie to appear from within its bloody depths.

What's the science on this, I wonder? Is there a luvvie gene and, if so, what therapies may one day be available to treat it?

Pick of the week

Car Bomb
27 July, 7pm, Channel 4
Robert Baer, ex-CIA man, on a cheap and terribly effective weapon.

House of Saddam
Starts 30 July, 9pm, BBC2
Drama about the inner workings of the Iraqi junta and first family.

Land of the Lost Jaguar
Starts 30 July, 8pm, BBC1
Scientists and cameramen visit Guyana's unspoilt jungles.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

capra124
25 July 2008 at 00:09

John is Scottish by birth, and he and his older sister, Carole both have learned to speak with an American accent simply as a self-preservation thing growing up in Middle America, but don't feel comfortable talking to family and other Scotsmen with the American accent. This fact has been stated and explained in so many different places, and I believe they felt it wasn't necessary to discuss on this particular programme, not to mention accents are learned, not necessarily genetic.

Just4Bri
25 July 2008 at 00:43

"Barrowman - surprise - got most turned on by pictures of man-on-man action, but performed more like a heterosexual woman when it came to skills such as map-reading and word association."

I find it disappointing that a journalist on a publication like the New Statesman would be clumsy enough to write the above sentence. The point of the vocabulary test, map reading etc were that John, while male, has a brain that reacts like a heterosexual women on these tests. So the above sentence would make more sense if an "and" where used, instead of "but"; as both test went towards showing that Mr. Barrowmans brain acts like a gay mans brain (or indeed, a heterosexual womens brain). Maybe it's the writer that does "...not strike me as the brightest sequin in the drawer"? On the whole this review seemed catty and shallow; ignoring the fact that homosexuality was still illegal in Scotland until 1980, and yet focusing on Mr. Barrowmans doll collection tells us more about the writer than the actual BBC programme. Was there really a need to cast aspersions on Mr. Barrowmans intelligence? The subject matter might not interest the "writer" of this piece, but I assure you that it will interest those who find human nature intellectually stimulating. Not to mention those, like the poor man who Mr. Barrowman met in the first part of the programme, who had been forced by social pressure to try to "cure" himself of being gay. The "writer" might find it pointless to try to help young (or old) gay men or lesbians understand and accept themselves, but thankfully the "writer" seems to be in the minority.

blans91
25 July 2008 at 16:54

"In everyday life, he has an American accent. However, when he talks to his Scottish parents, a weird thing happens, and when I say weird, I mean seriously scary. It's as if his body is suddenly taken over by the personality of an East Kilbride market-stall holder called Shona."

An amazing ignorance about bi- or multi-cultural identity is displayed in this. I observed Scottish-born children in Australia talk with a Scottish accent with their parents, and moments later with an Aussie one with the other kids. I am completely trilingual, and it depends upon the context in which language I think or speak. Which was is the 'real' one and what is 'fake'? Who is to decide that? Trilingual Tom

Jscribe
25 July 2008 at 17:37

I totally agree with the other comments made. I find the article shallow and trite, taking a subject that is clearly important to Mr.Barrowman, and treating it in such a contemptuous way.

I am no scientist, but a lot of the factfinding I found was by way of clutching at straws, and the real answer lay in a much simpler way. Taking the information given in the programme and viewing it as a whole, it seems that it depends on the level of testosterone in a foetus' body at the time of birth. One interesting thing which stuck was that a lesser amount brought out the female traits in a male. In the womb a small amount of testosterone would make a female foetus with female traits also. Does it not make sense that males with smaller amounts of testosterone tend to follow the feminine career paths, i.e. hairdressing, fashion design and the like.

What makes a female very flighty and feminine, and others more 'macho' whilst still being female.

By the same token what makes a male effeminate and others very hirsuite and'butch'.

Is it not the level of testosterone which is totally beyond an individuals control,

Unfortunately this is not something a person can choose, any more than we can choose our height, hair colour or the colour of our eyes. Its packaging in the womb that makes us what we are. Nothing else.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Rachel Cooke

Rachel Cooke trained as a reporter on The Sunday Times. She is now a writer at The Observer. In the 2006 British Press Awards, she was named Interviewer of the Year.

Read More

Vote!

Is this the worst economic situation for 60 years?