Return to: Home | Culture | Television

Who comes up with this stuff?

Rachel Cooke

Published 05 June 2008

The BBC fulfils its public service remit with some truly awful programmes This Week, Florence Nightingale BBC1 The Culture Show, Women in BlackBBC2

Sometimes I find television completely baffling. Who comes up with this stuff? The BBC, as a public service broadcaster, has a commitment not only to drama, but to politics, the arts and religious programming. But how to deal with these things in a modern, exciting way so that (this, at least, is what I'm guessing the sweet little moppets who pass for commissioning editors think as they scratch their heads in top-level meetings) people actually watch them?

Thus, the strands dealing with these subjects grow ever odder. Take politics. Is This Week, the Thursday-night programme (11.35pm) presented by Andrew Neil, supposed to be satirical? Neil's peculiar delivery - he sounds like a tipsy sixth-former performing in an end-of-term review - suggests that this might be so. Except that it isn't funny, ironic or remotely up to exposing the vices of our politicians (truly amazing, given the extent of their vices). A recent guest was . . . Les Dennis. And why do Diane Abbott and Michael Portillo, who appear every week, sit so close together? Their thigh-rubbing is creepy.

Then, the arts. On Tuesday at 10pm, The Culture Show moved to a new slot (it used to be on Saturday nights, when anyone who might reasonably be expected to watch a programme about "culture" was in fact likely to be out consuming it). This has been hailed as a great step forward. Lots of journalists, including me, were invited to a party to celebrate it - I didn't go; my VAT returns looked especially alluring that night - and an awful trailer plugging it appeared, featuring well-known culture vultures such as Piers Morgan and Adrian Chiles. I love Chiles. He's a broadcasting genius. But he's not exactly the guy who leaps to mind when you need someone to tell you the plot of Lucia di Lammermoor and, sure enough, in the trailer, he duly informed us that culture is "boring" and not as good "as beer".

My God, I am glad the BBC spent our money on paying an ad agency (Fallon) to come up with this drivel, aren't you? Not that all this hullabaloo is fooling anyone. The Culture Show is now just half an hour long. And it's still presented by Lauren Laverne, late of the punk band Kenickie, and who, I learn from the Radio Times, is mostly watching Peppa Pig on TV now. I wonder what she and her colleague Andrew Graham-Dixon chatted about at the party. The sad passing of Robert Rauschenberg, probably.

Which brings me to religious programming. It's not all Songs of Praise these days, you know. On BBC2, we've just finished enjoying the disgrace that is Women in Black (Thursdays, 7.30pm), a series about the lives of "real" Muslim women around the world, which resolutely refused to look at the issue of faith and human rights, preferring instead to focus on parties, make-up and just how glam a shalwar kameez can be.

Then, last Sunday, we were treated to an hour-long drama, Florence Nightingale (7pm). I wasn't expecting this to be religious programming; I settled down in front of it thinking it would be an expensive version of the stories of corsets and derring-do that they used to tell on Blue Peter (Grace Darling, Florence Nightingale; these women, plus Lesley Judd, were my role models). But I started to smell a rat early on, when Florence's suitor reminded her of the night she "played the piano . . . something new by Mr Chopin". This wasn't dialogue; it was a line lifted straight out of a Bunty annual, circa 1976. Then Florence (Laura Fraser) began talking to camera. Or, to be accurate, explaining. The film was mostly given over not to maggot-infested leg wounds, but to Florence's relationship with God, and to her realisation that in the great hospital that is the world, He is Matron.

From Lytton Strachey on, people have tried to dent the Nightingale myth. This just plumped it, as she would have done a particularly wretched patient's pillows. I can only assume that, dreary and deeply weird, it will be enlisted one day soon to keep Ofcom happy: it comprised, by my calculation, almost 1 per cent of the religious programming that the BBC must deliver every year. I simply can't think of any other way to explain its awfulness.

Pick of the week

Mary, Queen of Shops
Starts 9 June, 9pm, BBC2
Mary Portas is back, jangling her jewellery and beefing up boutiques.

The Victorian Sex Explorer
9 June, 9pm, Channel 4
Rupert Everett on Richard Burton.

Margaret Thatcher: the Long Walk to Finchley
12 June, 9pm, BBC4
The young Maggie. Did she really have the hots for Ted Heath?

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

7 comments from readers

knave
07 June 2008 at 07:08

OK Rachel and Antonia, Uncle Nick Cohen gives you his approval.

Well done girls. You have written articles slagging off the nasty BBC and the horrible lefties.

A- but remember for a A+ you must slag off a ethic communuty.

Now back to the classroom and carry on with your studies.

knave
07 June 2008 at 07:11

I do apologize I meant ethnic community.

Cybertiger
07 June 2008 at 11:07

"I do apologize I meant ethnic community."

The word is 'apologise'. Another apology, Mr. Knave?

knave
07 June 2008 at 20:12

Not if I'm an American or very posh. They use the z instead of the s

Cybertiger
08 June 2008 at 07:59

@knave

"Not if I'm an American or very posh."

The evidence suggests that you are neither. So, what about the apology? If you were an American, you should apologise for the fact as a matter of course, as a matter of common courtesy. There is now great shame in being American.

PS. I find the relentless march of the zee and the zed, a matter of great concern.

knave
08 June 2008 at 16:13

I,m not posh ?

How dare you old boy say such a thing.

Also I must disagree with you about Americans, most of them are very decent.

Cybertiger
08 June 2008 at 19:40

@knave

"Also I must disagree with you about Americans, most of them are very decent."

I take it they are not the ones who have democratically underwritten the torture of remand prisoners as described by Clive Stafford Smith on,

http://www.newstatesman.com/human-rights/2008/06/music-binya...

I think most Americans are vile.

PS. There is really nothing posh about the relentless march of the zee.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Rachel Cooke

Rachel Cooke trained as a reporter on The Sunday Times. She is now a writer at The Observer. In the 2006 British Press Awards, she was named Interviewer of the Year.

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker