Registered user login:

Breaking the silence

Rachel Cooke

Published 04 October 2007

Stephen Fry proves that celebrity docs don't have to be cynical or simplistic
Stephen Fry: HIV and Me BBC2
The Life and Times of Vivienne Vyle BBC2

I'm allergic to documentaries that are presented by celebrities. Not long ago, one of the Geldof progeny made a film about the veil which, simplistic to the point of insult, so enraged me that I had a nasty dream about her involving a burqa and various garden tools. (I'd better not say more; I don't want Bob coming round and shouting the odds.) Then again, some "celebrities" - admittedly it feels like a minority, these days - are people whose names we know because they're good at something. Stephen Fry falls into this camp, and he's good at not only one thing, but everything (don't all shout "Apart from theatre work": that's mean). Even so, I wasn't predisposed to like HIV and Me (2 and 9 October, 9pm). Fry is not HIV-positive, so its title seemed narcissistic, unless it was just a cynical hint that he was about to reveal otherwise, and thus grab all the voyeurs who get off on celeb misery come test result time.

But perhaps it's me that's cynical. Once I had seen the film, my feeling was that if even one fetid Jeremy Kyle addict saw a trailer for HIV and Me (the one I caught showed Fry taking a blood test) and was sufficiently intrigued to tune in, this was cause for celebration. A weird radio silence surrounds HIV, although infection rates even in the UK are rising rapidly - a silence that is contributing to complacency and, ultimately, death rates. Fry's film was informative and fearless. It was also deeply human, its horrifying statistics brought to life by people brave enough to say that they have the virus on television. I loved the way Fry talked to them. In contrast to most patronising hospital-touring politicians, he doesn't adjust his accent when talking to those who didn't, unlike him, attend public school or Cambridge. He also exudes a great and unfakeable kindness.

Why aren't gay men using condoms? Why are infection rates in Africa higher than in Europe? Because some gay men think that drugs will save them and, worse, regard HIV-positive status as a badge of honour; because in sub-Saharan Africa, 20-40 per cent of adults have multiple or concurrent partners, a pattern that increases the rate of infection more drastically than serial monogamy. These facts are uncomfortable, but Fry was unwilling to dance round them. The consequences of doing otherwise are too great. Many patients are resistant to the drugs; others will succumb to Aids-related illnesses in spite of them.

If this makes his film sound relentless, however, that's wrong. There were blackly funny moments, too. In the UK, half of the 7,000 new infections every year are contracted through straight sex. Fry investigated a case in Doncaster where a nightclub bouncer who died of Aids was feared to have infected hundreds of local women. Were Doncaster's females all reckless binge drinkers? "It's worse in Barnsley," read the newspaper headline.

I mentioned Jeremy Kyle, who has been much in the news: a judge called his ITV show "a human form of bear-baiting". So, it's a good time for Jennifer Saunders to launch her Thursday-night (9pm) comedy The Life and Times of Vivienne Vyle (Vyle/Kyle . . . do you see what she did there?). But there are two problems. The first is that Kyle's show - so aggressive, so outlandish - is probably beyond satire. Second, Saunders and her co-writer, the TV psychologist Dr Tanya Byron, have dished up a quite outstandingly lumpen script, and have peopled it with stock types whose tics are so munificent, you can feel your migraine aura coming on even as you watch.

Chief among them is Miranda Richardson as Helena, Vivienne's ruthless but inept producer. The "twist" is that, behind the scenes, Helena and Vivienne are as dysfunctional as the emotionally incontinent morons ("I want a vagina but I can't kick the crack") they deride on set. So Vivienne has an apparently gay husband, and Helena's child spends so little time with her that she speaks only Spanish, like her nanny. Laugh count: zero. If Saunders and Byron were ever to appear on The Jeremy Kyle Show it would say beneath their names: "We want a smash hit, but no one except our husbands and the fools who commissioned us thinks we are funny."

Pick of the week

Arena: Tribute Bands – Into the Limelight
6 October, 10.30pm, BBC2
Uplifting film with Keith, a man who pretends to be Kurt Cobain.

The Cult of the Suicide Bomber
Continues 8 October, 8pm, Channel 4
Robert Baer, ex-CIA agent, looks at what motivates these attackers.

30 Rock
11 October, 10.45pm, Channel 5
America’s hottest new comedy.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

5 comments from readers

Carl Jones
05 October 2007 at 09:26

Oh dear its AID`s. I won`t go into the line of thinking which suggests it was designed by the US military and the WHO.

They tell you to practice safe sex and use a condom, yet the HIV viron (its not a virus) is so small it can pass through the smallest (tested and passed) holes in a condom....so much for good health advice. Go on Africa...use a condom and feel safe.

DrMike
05 October 2007 at 10:44

I barely know where to begin ....... but here goes:

a "viron" is a single virus particle

HIV is a virus "Human Immunodeficiency Virus"

"its" (meaning "it is") has an apostrophe: "it's"

AIDS (Acquired ImmunoDeficiency Syndrome) does not have an apostrophe

Condoms do protect against HIV and pregnancy

Nothing is perfect (including condoms)

The tale about HIV particles passing freely though microscopic holes in condoms is a myth propagated by some religious extremists

In summary, Carl Jones has no idea what he is talking about here and is peddling dangerous nonsense.

HoldThemToAccount
05 October 2007 at 14:14

Thank you, Dr. Mike. It is important for people like Mr. Jones to be Held to Account.

With you all the way.

Carl Jones
09 October 2007 at 01:17

Hi there Dr Mike...of course, you would take that line, wouldn`t you.

For the benefit of all sexually active humans, you`d be prepared to have sex using a condon with 1000 HIV positive women? I thought not.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/aids/story/0,7369,1059068,00.html

When they test a condom, its on a lump of steel so it can be tested electronically. From my once youthfull exprirence, when I used these horrible things, condoms stretch...so any holes will also stretch. Testing systems are not as good as the manufactures make out. You can keep peddling the NWO mantra...I can find no end of sex health sites who can only claim that condoms give at best 80/90% protection on STD`s...this is far worse than pregnancy protection which is claimed to be 98%.

The TRUTH is dangerous, when the NWO wants population reduction. Wot do I care...USE A CONDOM, kill as many as you can...its got to be green.lol

Carl Jones
10 October 2007 at 12:31

Where have you gone Dr Mike?

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Rachel Cooke

Rachel Cooke trained as a reporter on The Sunday Times. She is now a writer at The Observer. In the 2006 British Press Awards, she was named Interviewer of the Year.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?