Scepticism about growth potential of "enterprise zones"
The government today announced 11 new "enterprise zones" but there is doubt as to whether new jobs w
By Sophie FitzMaurice Published 17 August 2011
The government has announced the location of 11 more so-called "enterprise zones", brining to 21 the total number of sites marked out for redevelopment.
The Secretary for Communities and Local Government, Eric Pickles, spoke on the BBC's Today Programme this morning of the government's plan to "rebalance" the economy and "reduce dependency on the financial industry" by investing in local, targeted redevelopment programmes.
He said the enterprise zones will target "specific sites against specific industries against specific proposals". Answering presenter James Naughtie's question about the North-South divide, where economic growth and prosperity is disproportionately focused in the South East of England, Pickles said the government's plans would help revitalise manufacturing in the North.
Enterprise zones will combine tax breaks, looser planning regulation and faster broadband in certain areas in order to encourage job creation and business venture. The government has estimated that 30,000 jobs will be created by 2015 as a result of the enterprise zones.
However, there is much scepticism about the potential of enterprise zones to create jobs and lead to economic growth. Similar ventures were undertaken by the Thatcher government in the 1980s, but rather than creating new jobs, they tended to "displace" old ones, according to the Chair of the West Midlands Institute of Directors, John Rider.
Naughtie also raised the point that, as jobs are being haemorrhaged in the public sector, 30,000 new private sector jobs - if the target is even reached - may not do much to address unemployment.
The new enterprise zones are in Cambridgeshire; Cornwall; Gosport; Harlow; Hereford; Humber Estuary; Newquay; Great Yarmouth, Norfolk; Northampton; Hinckley, Leicestershire; Sandwich, Kent; Oxfordshire; Runcorn; and Lowestoft, Suffolk.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


1 comment
Similar regional schemes have been tried back at least the 1960s if not before. They have never delivered. There must be a logical reason why they fail. It would be worthwhile having a university or research organisation conduct a full analysis of such schemes including financial and economic modelling. This should help determine what types of detailed criteria would make schemes work assuming there are any.