The idea that you can tackle misogyny with a porn filter or a plastic bag is one of the more ludicrous conceits of social conservatives in modern times.
David Cameron's attempt to introduce a porn filter mark the day the Conservative party embraced the nanny state.
Ban this sick filth. No, not THIS sick filth, obviously.
Including, who decides what counts as 'pornography', what happens when people 'opt-in' and what about page 3?
The worst thing about this debate is that it turns a real-world, complex problem into a simple moral choice.
Can only when we stop confusing artistic merit with ethical deformity can we start having interesting conversations about what constitutes “artistic” pornography and whether there’s a market for it, says Tabatha Leggett.
Never has it been so easy for young children to watch violent pornography. Can politicians who grew up in the analogue age do anything about it?