No Place For Children

The New Statesman No Place for Children campaign calls on the government to end the detention of children for immigration reasons

No Place for Children campaign

Features

Clegg calls time on child detention

Clegg calls time on child detention

  • By George Eaton
  • 16 December 2010

A Lib Dem achievement to celebrate.

Child detention – the answer is justice, not tougher measures

Child detention – the answer is justice, not tougher measures

  • By Samira Shackle
  • 02 November 2010

Pilot scheme giving families a fortnight to leave the UK “voluntarily” has not been successful so far.

Refugee and Migrant Justice placed into administration

  • By Daniel Trilling
  • 15 June 2010

Crisis deepens for the asylum charity.

Why Refugee and Migrant Justice must not be allowed to fail

Why Refugee and Migrant Justice must not be allowed to fail

  • By Daniel Trilling
  • 03 June 2010

Vulnerable people need an advocate in the face of an uncaring system.

Their right to liberty

Their right to liberty

  • By Alice O'Keeffe
  • 18 December 2008

The NS campaign against holding children in immigration detention centres has gathered powerful support, but reform is still needed

Facing deportation

  • By Katy Taylor
  • 25 September 2008

Asylum seekers the Nukajem family are waiting in Yarls Wood detention to find out if they are to be sent home to Cameroon. Read their story...

No place for children petition

No place for children petition

  • 25 September 2008

Your chance to support the New Statesman's No Place for Children campaign: join Philip Pullman, Monica Ali, Nick Hornby and others in signing our petition calling for an end to the detention of children for immigration reasons

One step forward . . .

  • By Alice O'Keeffe
  • 25 September 2008

The government has announced a new commitment to equal rights for asylum-seeking children. Now they must put it into practice

A fair deal for children

A fair deal for children

  • By Lisa Nandy
  • 18 September 2008

The government claims to be looking into alternatives to detention for minors - but so far its pilot schemes have been disastrously flawed. There are more humane and effective options, writes Lisa Nandy of the Children's Society

Innocent prisoners

Innocent prisoners

  • By Gillian Slovo
  • 11 September 2008

Only Asylum-seekers' children can be locked up without committing a crime. Gillian Slovo visited two families at Yarl's Wood. What she heard made her feel "numb"

Testimonies

Hidden lives, public voices part 2

Hidden lives, public voices part 2

  • 09 October 2008

Juliet Stevenson reads the story of Tessa, who was sent to Yarl's Wood with her 1-year-old twins

Bethlehem's testimony

  • 30 September 2008

"Once we got inside, it felt as if we were in prison for doing an awful crime"

“My dreams are not important to anyone”

  • 04 September 2008

'Our first night in Yarl's Wood was just terrible. We couldn't eat and we couldn't sleep. There were special people there to look after my mum to stop her trying to kill herself again'

“The detainees have got pain in their eyes”

  • By Meltem Avcil
  • 04 September 2008

In my school report this summer, they said I was an excellent student. I am making a new start and one day I will show everyone what I am capable of. But I will never forget Yarl's Wood

Helene’s testimony

  • 04 September 2008

'They put me and my baby in a kind of cage in the back of a van, like we were animals'

Katherine's testimony

  • 04 September 2008

'I wanted to kill myself all the time I was there. And I think Joseph picked up on how I felt, because he cried so much. Some of his hair fell out, he wouldn’t eat and became ill'

Juliet's testimony

  • 04 September 2008

'I hated to see my baby being locked up. They put you in one tiny room and there is not even a bed for the baby'

Danielle's testimony

  • 04 September 2008

'Yarl’s Wood is a living hell, especially for children. They don’t have the right kind of milk for young children. I complained and they said he could drink what they gave us, or drink nothing at all'

The New Statesman No Place for Children campaign calls on the government to end the detention of children for immigration reasons

Every year, around 2,000 children pass through the UK’s immigration detention centres. They are there because their parents have applied for asylum in the UK. Detention is physically and emotionally damaging for children, as the detainees' testimonies so painfully demonstrate. In many cases, children have lived for most of their lives in Britain, and consider this country their home. Many subsequently receive refugee status, but children who have been detained remain deeply traumatised by their experiences.

We are also calling for key improvements to the system while the detention of children continues:


  • Better independent oversight of the system

  • Accurate records to be kept of all children in the immigration detention system: who are they, where are they, how old are they and how long have they been held?

  • Welfare assessments to be made of all children on entry into detention

  • Reasons for detention and reviews to be given to parents in their own languages

Over the coming weeks the New Statesman will report on children in immigration detention: the policies, the human stories, and possible alternative approaches. We hope that readers will get involved by signing a petition, launched later in September, and by supporting the campaign’s backers Women for Refugee Women, The Children's Society, Bail for Immigration Detainees (Bid) and 11 Million.

Together with our readers, the New Statesman hopes to send the government a clear message: the UK’s policy of incarcerating innocent minors must stop. Immigration detention centres are no place for children.


When I went to Yarl's Wood and met children who were detained I was deeply shocked by the brutality of their treatment. It is time for people in Britain to stand up and say we should not be locking up innocent children. Seeking asylum is not a crime.

Juliet Stephenson

Liam Byrne, Border and Immigration Minister, responds:

We are absolutely clear that UK Border Agency’s treatment of children must be as sensitive as possible. That's why we've transformed our children’s policy, and even legislated to impose a duty on UKBA to keep children safe from harm. We would only ever detain children so they can stay together with their parents, which is where they are safest - we never want to split up families. And we are actively testing alternatives to detention which we'll roll out when we know they work and offer the best possible protection.

The interview

Preview: Ken Livingstone: “The world is run by monsters”

The interview

Preview: Boris Johnson: “I’ll tell you what makes me angry – lefty crap”

On Syria

Intervention in Syria won’t work, so how do we stop Assad?

GOP race so far

Infographic: Republican primary race 2012

Mind your B-sides

Mind your B-sides

Time to rethink

Time to rethink, not reassure

Who minds?

Latter Day Taint?

Alistair Darling

Alistair Darling, the Miliband dilemma and what the party must do next
NewStatesman

Newsletter!
Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team
chronicle of protest
Vote!

Can the UK achieve it’s commitment to carbon reduction targets by 2020?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2010