Iain Duncan Smith
Iain Duncan Smith was once right about the need for drastic change - then he got everything else wrong.
Lib Dem rebels table amendment to Welfare Uprating Bill calling for benefits to increase in line with average earnings, rather than Osborne's 1 per cent.
The government's Impact Assessment shows that the poorest 10 per cent of households lose the most from the decision to raise benefits by just 1 per cent.
Unable to justify the government's decision to cut support for families, the Work and Pensions Secretary has resorted to myths.
The fact that benefits have risen faster than wages is an argument for higher wages, not lower benefits.
The welfare state was much more than an artefact of one man’s genius.
Ministers seem genuinely to believe that fear and stress are the keys to lifting people out of poverty.
Undue focus on "scrounging" is draining public support for welfare at a time when a proper safety net is desperately needed by millions of vulnerable people.
Iain Duncan Smith's plan to change the way child poverty is measured is a distraction.
While long-term unemployment has soared, referrals to the Work Programme have halved.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists
