Show Hide image

Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. David Cameron and Ed Miliband don't matter as much as they think (Guardian)

Both leaders are hiring Barack Obama aides for the 2015 election, but Britain will be voting for a party, not a president or a personality, writes Steve Richards. 

2. An equal society will not hinder growth (Financial Times)

Inequality damages the economy and efforts to remedy it are, on the whole, not harmful, writes Martin Wolf.

3. Whisper it, but Obamacare may be working (Times)

The health policy has been a disaster so far, but it could turn into an historic achievement, writes Justin Webb.

4. Pastor Cameron has played his hand - now it’s over to Dr Miliband (Daily Telegraph)

A community-driven health service would do the Labour Party’s prospects the power of good, says Mary Riddell. 

5. Time to invest in Britain’s future (Financial Times)

Fine words on infrastructure spending are not enough, says an FT editorial.

6. Panicked Tories are risking the UK’s future (Daily Telegraph)

Alex Salmond’s separatist bunkum on Scottish independence has triggered a case of the Westminster wobbles, writes Alan Cochrane. 

7. Let's make industrial action bigger than striking teachers (Guardian)

Parents sympathise with teachers' grievances, so they need to work out a way to take complementary action, says Zoe Williams.

8. Sacking David Moyes made no sense at all (Times)

You cannot judge a manager over a mere nine months – and you shouldn’t judge an organisation by its leader anyway, says Daniel Finkelstein.

9. Calling Ukip’s posters ‘racist’ is yet another example of shameful Westminster evasion (Independent)

It’s a classic tactic by those who want to shut down this debate, says Nigel Farage.

10. Gordon Brown: union man (Guardian)

Former PM has challenged the idea that politics and society can be neatly separated, by emphasising the question of pensions in the Scotland debate, says a Guardian editorial.

Show Hide image

Does the UK care enough about climate change to admit it is part of the problem?

The government’s energy policies make can make it hard to decipher its commitment to emissions reduction.

“People tell me it’s ridiculous to be flying for a climate change project but you have to get real with it, I mean I can’t cycle across the Southern ocean,” says Daniel Price, an environmental scientist from London. As founder of Pole-to-Paris, Price is about to complete a 17,000km bike ride from the Antarctic to the Arc de Triomphe.

Price came up with the idea in an effort to raise public awareness of COP21, the UN Climate Change Conference taking place in Paris next week. During the trip he’s faced a succession of set-backs: from the discovery that boats were prohibitively expensive, to diplomatic tensions scuppering his Russian visa plans. Yet the darkest moments were when he became overwhelmed by the magnitude of his own mission. “There were difficult times when I just thought, ‘What is the point of this’?” he says. “Cycling round the world is nowhere near enough to engage people.” 

As world leaders descend on Paris, many questions remain unanswered. Not least how much support developing nations will receive in tackling the effects of climate change. New research commissioned by Oxfam claims that such costs could rise to £1.7tn a year by 2050. But with cuts kicking in at home, the need to deliver “climate justice” abroad feels like a bigger ask than ever.

So does Britain really care enough about climate change to accept its full part in this burden? The government’s energy policies make can make it hard to decipher its commitment to emissions reduction. In September, however, it did pledge £5.8bn from the foreign aid fund to helping poorer nations combat climate change (twice that promised by China and the United States). And there’s evidence to suggest that we, as a public, may also care more than we think.

In America attitudes are much darker; in the dismissive words of Donald Trump “It’s called the weather”. Not least since, as a recent study proves, over the last twenty years corporations have systematically spread scepticism about the science. “The contrarian efforts have been so effective," says the author Justin Farrell, a Yale sociologist, "that they have made it difficult for ordinary Americans to even know who to trust.” 

And what about in China, the earth's biggest polluter? Single-party rule and the resulting lack of public discussion would seem to be favouring action on the environment. The government has recently promised to reach "peak" emissions by 2030, to quadruple solar installations, and to commit $3.1bn to help low-income countries adapt to the changing world. Christiana Figueres, the UN’s chief climate official, has even lauded the country for taking “undisputed leadership” on climate change mitigation.

Yet this surge of policy could mask the most troubling reality of all: that, when it comes to climate change, the Chinese are the least concerned citizenship in the world. Only 18 per cent of Chinese see the issue as a very serious problem, down 23 percentage points from five years ago, and 36 points behind the global median.

A new study by political economist Dr Alex Lo has concluded that the country’s reduced political debate could be to blame for the lack of concern. “In China popular environmentalism is biased towards immediate environmental threats”, such as desertification and pollution, Lo writes, “giving little impetus to a morally driven climate change movement”.

For the international community, all is well and good as long as the Chinese government continues along its current trajectory. But without an engaged public to hold it to account there’s always a chance its promises may fade into thin air.

So perhaps the UK’s tendency to moan about how hard it is to care about the (seemingly) remote impacts of climate change isn’t all bad. At least we know it is something worth moaning about. And perhaps we care more than we let on to each other.

Statistics published this summer by the Department of Energy and Climate Change reveal that three quarters of the British public support subsidies for renewable energy, despite only 10 per cent thinking that the figure is that high. “Even if the public think the consensus is not there, there are encouraging signs that it is,” says Liz Callegari, Head of Campaigns at WWF. “Concern for climate change is growing.”

As Price puts it, “You can think of climate change as this kind of marathon effort that we have to address and in Paris we just have to get people walking across the start line together”. Maybe then we will all be ready to run.

India Bourke is the New Statesman's editorial assistant.