Show Hide image

Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. Protect Britain in a two-speed Europe (Financial Times)

States outside the eurozone should not be at disadvantage in the EU, write George Osborne and Wolfgang Schäuble.

2. Children don’t earn their inheritance. Tax it (Times)

A fair society would let people keep as much of their earnings as possible but take a cut from property and land, says Philip Collins. 

3. Osborne must not run scared of housing (Daily Telegraph)

If the Chancellor is charging up the nation’s credit card, he should spend it on property, says Jeremy Warner. 

4. Farage's TV debate has lit the European touchpaper – are we in or out? (Guardian)

Britain is a step closer to leaving Europe this week, writes Polly Toynbee. It is high time all who fear an exit from the union spoke out against the liars.

5. Only one person is laughing at the Farage-Clegg EU pantomime (Daily Telegraph)

The PM is offering a grown-up discussion on radical reform of the European Union, along with the Germans and Dutch, says Fraser Nelson. 

6. We should thank Putin for one thing - the west is once again the West (Independent)

Thanks to Mr Putin it is experiencing a frisson of unity it has not known for a long time, writes Peter Popham. 

7. Why foxhunting has become an unspeakable topic (Daily Telegraph)

A reluctance to address the contentious issue of foxhunting is dividing the Tory party, says Isabel Hardman. 

8. Labour is part of the problem, not the solution (Guardian)

Its rhetoric may be softer than the Tories', but the party still puts profit before people, says Ken Loach. Left Unity offers a new voice.

9. Osborne had to aid spenders over savers (Financial Times)

The Chancellor’s plans, if implemented, mean turning the government into a substantial net saver, writes Martin Wolf. 

10. Price of Power (Times)

Energy suppliers say that a competition inquiry would interfere with investment plans, but it must go ahead, says a Times editorial. 

Jeremy Corbyn delivers a speech on the arts in north London on September 1, 2015. Photograph: Getty Images.
Show Hide image

Can Labour MPs force Corbyn to bring back shadow cabinet elections?

It is not up to the parliamentary party whether the contests are reintroduced. 

Soon after Jeremy Corbyn became the frontrunner in the Labour leadership contest, it was reported that he intended to bring back shadow cabinet elections. But as I later wrote, that's not the case. Corbyn has resolved that he will maintain the right to appoint his own team, rather than having it elected by MPs (as was the case before Ed Miliband changed the system in 2011). As he wrote in the NS: "Whoever emerges as leader on 12 September needs a shadow cabinet in place as soon as possible. I will appoint a strong, diverse shadow cabinet to hold this government to account from day one."

Now, ahead of his likely victory a week on Saturday, Corbyn is under pressure from some MPs to reverse his stance. Barry Sheerman, the former education select commitee chair, told me that he wanted a "serious discussion" within the PLP about the return of the elections. While some support their reinstatement on principled grounds, others recognise that there is a tactical advantage in Corbyn's opponents winning a mandate from MPs. His hand would be further weakened (he has the declared support of just 14 of his Commons colleagues). 

But their reinstatement is not as simple as some suggest. One senior MP told me that those demanding their return "had not read the rule book". Miliband's decision to scrap the elections was subsequently approved at party conference meaning that only this body can revive them. A simple majority of MPs is not enough. 

With Corbyn planning to have a new team in place as soon as possible after his election, there is little prospect of him proposing such upheaval at this point. Meanwhile, Chuka Umunna has attracted much attention by refusing to rule out joining the left-winger's shadow cabinet if he changes his stances on nuclear disarmament, Nato, the EU and taxation (a lengthy list). Umunna is unlikely to remain on the frontbench but having previously pledged not to serve, he now recognises that there is value in being seen to at least engage with Corbyn. Were he to simply adopt a stance of aggression, he would risk being blamed if the backbencher failed. It is one example of how the party's modernisers recognise they need to play a smarter game. I explore this subject further in my column in tomorrow's NS

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.