Show Hide image

Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. One by one, Labour is losing the arguments (Times)

Because Ed Miliband never apologised for overspending he may never convince voters that he’ll keep control of their taxes, says Philip Collins. 

2. Older people vote – that's why George Osborne's budget is for them (Guardian)

Less than half our younger generation go to the polls, writes Polly Toynbee. So it's no surprise the chancellor is increasingly hanging them out to dry.

3. Russia’s test for America’s odd couple (Financial Times)

Ukraine presents both danger and opportunity to the analyst Obama and the activist Kerry, says Philip Stephens. 

4. The Budget brings out the worst in Labour thinking (Daily Telegraph)

Ed Miliband and Ed Balls decided to bow out of debating any of the actual announcements - preferring to talk about previous Budgets, writes Isabel Hardman. 

5. Popular Funds (Times)

The Chancellor is right to trust people with their own money when it comes to pensions, says a Times editorial. 

6. Politics is in new territory after George Osborne’s pensions revolution (Daily Telegraph)

The zero era of cheap debt endures, but the welfare state may never be quite the same again, says Fraser Nelson. 

7. Tourism overwhelms the world's historic places, but pays no dues (Guardian)

As Venice overturns a ban on giant cruise liners, it is clear that the places people flock to are incapable of preserving themselves, writes Simon Jenkins. 

8. This Spanish initiative should be a lesson to us all (Independent)

Diasporas are a terrible menace, as the Israelis know to their cost, writes Peter Popham. 

9. Bumpy ride for the makers as Budget's lack of consistency could hinder long-term investments (Daily Mail)

If there is a criticism to be made about Osborne’s Budget for the makers it is that it lacks consistency, says Alex Brummer. 

10. Pensioners will have the freedom to spend their savings as they wish – but where will this ‘free, impartial’ advice come from? (Independent)

The Treasury must have remembered the mis-selling scandals of the mid-1990s, writes Andreas Whittam Smith. 

Getty
Show Hide image

Labour's establishment suspects a Momentum conspiracy - they're right

Bernie Sanders-style organisers are determined to rewire the party's machine.  

If you wanted to understand the basic dynamics of this year’s Labour leadership contest, Brighton and Hove District Labour Party is a good microcosm. On Saturday 9 July, a day before Angela Eagle was to announce her leadership bid, hundreds of members flooded into its AGM. Despite the room having a capacity of over 250, the meeting had to be held in three batches, with members forming an orderly queue. The result of the massive turnout was clear in political terms – pro-Corbyn candidates won every position on the local executive committee. 

Many in the room hailed the turnout and the result. But others claimed that some in the crowd had engaged in abuse and harassment.The national party decided that, rather than first investigate individuals, it would suspend Brighton and Hove. Add this to the national ban on local meetings and events during the leadership election, and it is easy to see why Labour seems to have an uneasy relationship with mass politics. To put it a less neutral way, the party machine is in a state of open warfare against Corbyn and his supporters.

Brighton and Hove illustrates how local activists have continued to organise – in an even more innovative and effective way than before. On Thursday 21 July, the week following the CLP’s suspension, the local Momentum group organised a mass meeting. More than 200 people showed up, with the mood defiant and pumped up.  Rather than listen to speeches, the room then became a road test for a new "campaign meetup", a more modestly titled version of the "barnstorms" used by the Bernie Sanders campaign. Activists broke up into small groups to discuss the strategy of the campaign and then even smaller groups to organise action on a very local level. By the end of the night, 20 phonebanking sessions had been planned at a branch level over the following week. 

In the past, organising inside the Labour Party was seen as a slightly cloak and dagger affair. When the Labour Party bureaucracy expelled leftwing activists in past decades, many on went further underground, organising in semi-secrecy. Now, Momentum is doing the exact opposite. 

The emphasis of the Corbyn campaign is on making its strategy, volunteer hubs and events listings as open and accessible as possible. Interactive maps will allow local activists to advertise hundreds of events, and then contact people in their area. When they gather to phonebank in they will be using a custom-built web app which will enable tens of thousands of callers to ring hundreds of thousands of numbers, from wherever they are.

As Momentum has learned to its cost, there is a trade-off between a campaign’s openness and its ability to stage manage events. But in the new politics of the Labour party, in which both the numbers of interested people and the capacity to connect with them directly are increasing exponentially, there is simply no contest. In order to win the next general election, Labour will have to master these tactics on a much bigger scale. The leadership election is the road test. 

Even many moderates seem to accept that the days of simply triangulating towards the centre and getting cozy with the Murdoch press are over. Labour needs to reach people and communities directly with an ambitious digital strategy and an army of self-organising activists. It is this kind of mass politics that delivered a "no" vote in Greece’s referendum on the terms of the Eurozone bailout last summer – defying pretty much the whole of the media, business and political establishment. 

The problem for Corbyn's challenger, Owen Smith, is that many of his backers have an open problem with this type of mass politics. Rather than investigate allegations of abuse, they have supported the suspension of CLPs. Rather than seeing the heightened emotions that come with mass mobilisations as side-effects which needs to be controlled, they have sought to joins unconnected acts of harassment, in order to smear Jeremy Corbyn. The MP Ben Bradshaw has even seemed to accuse Momentum of organising a conspiracy to physically attack Labour MPs.

The real conspiracy is much bigger than that. Hundreds of thousands of people are arriving, enthusiastic and determined, into the Labour party. These people, and their ability to convince the communities of which they are a part, threaten Britain’s political equilibrium, both the Conservatives and the Labour establishment. When the greatest hope for Labour becomes your greatest nightmare, you have good call to feel alarmed.