Show Hide image

Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. Osborne must show he is on the side of those who suffer (Daily Telegraph)

The Chancellor will struggle to silence Labour’s charge that his Budget measures are unfair, writes Mary Riddell. 

2. Prise Ukraine from Putin’s claws (Financial Times)

Russia’s revanchism has to be stopped, even for its own sake, says Martin Wolf. 

3. The Budget is just a gimmick. So let’s ditch it (Times)

Tinkering with taxes every few months may play to the crowd but it’s a disaster for business and prosperity, says Daniel Finkelstein. 

4. Afghanistan: as China forges new alliances, a new Great Game has begun (Guardian)

A common interest in central Asia over Uighur and Taliban militancy is bringing together Beijing and the United States, says William Dalrymple. 

5. The focus is on Crimea, but next is the fight for Ukraine (Guardian)

Despite today's shooting, the west must not forget that the pivotal struggle is over control of the eastern heartlands, writes Timothy Garton Ash. 

6. The Sunni revolt in Syria has given al-Qa’ida more power in Iraq (Independent)

The western powers failed to see that by supporting the armed uprising in Syria, they would inevitably destabilise Iraq, writes Patrick Cockburn. 

7. Putin thinks the west is as weak as jelly. And the tragedy is he's right (Daily Mail)

We neither need nor wish to fight Russia, but the west must abandon its dismally failed attempt to appease its leader, says Max Hastings. 

8. Couples on £300K should pay for their own nannies (Times)

We tax one-earner couples much more than other nations, writes Jill Kirby. 

9. George Osborne, it's not your job to look after the very rich (Guardian)

Britain will always have a wealth gap, writes Simon Jenkins. What's shocking is how governments conspire in its obscene unfairness.

10. Our outrageous tax system isn’t just bad economics. It’s immoral too (Independent)

Those in Westminster have dragged people into a spiral of excessive taxation, ripping the heart of the productivity of our economy, says Nigel Farage. 

Getty
Show Hide image

Labour's establishment suspects a Momentum conspiracy - they're right

Bernie Sanders-style organisers are determined to rewire the party's machine.  

If you wanted to understand the basic dynamics of this year’s Labour leadership contest, Brighton and Hove District Labour Party is a good microcosm. On Saturday 9 July, a day before Angela Eagle was to announce her leadership bid, hundreds of members flooded into its AGM. Despite the room having a capacity of over 250, the meeting had to be held in three batches, with members forming an orderly queue. The result of the massive turnout was clear in political terms – pro-Corbyn candidates won every position on the local executive committee. 

Many in the room hailed the turnout and the result. But others claimed that some in the crowd had engaged in abuse and harassment.The national party decided that, rather than first investigate individuals, it would suspend Brighton and Hove. Add this to the national ban on local meetings and events during the leadership election, and it is easy to see why Labour seems to have an uneasy relationship with mass politics. To put it a less neutral way, the party machine is in a state of open warfare against Corbyn and his supporters.

Brighton and Hove illustrates how local activists have continued to organise – in an even more innovative and effective way than before. On Thursday 21 July, the week following the CLP’s suspension, the local Momentum group organised a mass meeting. More than 200 people showed up, with the mood defiant and pumped up.  Rather than listen to speeches, the room then became a road test for a new "campaign meetup", a more modestly titled version of the "barnstorms" used by the Bernie Sanders campaign. Activists broke up into small groups to discuss the strategy of the campaign and then even smaller groups to organise action on a very local level. By the end of the night, 20 phonebanking sessions had been planned at a branch level over the following week. 

In the past, organising inside the Labour Party was seen as a slightly cloak and dagger affair. When the Labour Party bureaucracy expelled leftwing activists in past decades, many on went further underground, organising in semi-secrecy. Now, Momentum is doing the exact opposite. 

The emphasis of the Corbyn campaign is on making its strategy, volunteer hubs and events listings as open and accessible as possible. Interactive maps will allow local activists to advertise hundreds of events, and then contact people in their area. When they gather to phonebank in they will be using a custom-built web app which will enable tens of thousands of callers to ring hundreds of thousands of numbers, from wherever they are.

As Momentum has learned to its cost, there is a trade-off between a campaign’s openness and its ability to stage manage events. But in the new politics of the Labour party, in which both the numbers of interested people and the capacity to connect with them directly are increasing exponentially, there is simply no contest. In order to win the next general election, Labour will have to master these tactics on a much bigger scale. The leadership election is the road test. 

Even many moderates seem to accept that the days of simply triangulating towards the centre and getting cozy with the Murdoch press are over. Labour needs to reach people and communities directly with an ambitious digital strategy and an army of self-organising activists. It is this kind of mass politics that delivered a "no" vote in Greece’s referendum on the terms of the Eurozone bailout last summer – defying pretty much the whole of the media, business and political establishment. 

The problem for Corbyn's challenger, Owen Smith, is that many of his backers have an open problem with this type of mass politics. Rather than investigate allegations of abuse, they have supported the suspension of CLPs. Rather than seeing the heightened emotions that come with mass mobilisations as side-effects which needs to be controlled, they have sought to joins unconnected acts of harassment, in order to smear Jeremy Corbyn. The MP Ben Bradshaw has even seemed to accuse Momentum of organising a conspiracy to physically attack Labour MPs.

The real conspiracy is much bigger than that. Hundreds of thousands of people are arriving, enthusiastic and determined, into the Labour party. These people, and their ability to convince the communities of which they are a part, threaten Britain’s political equilibrium, both the Conservatives and the Labour establishment. When the greatest hope for Labour becomes your greatest nightmare, you have good call to feel alarmed.