Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. What a fairer Scotland would look like (Independent)

Despite its progressive rhetoric, the SNP would hand big business a mighty cheque, writes Owen Jones.

2. Three cheers for Tory rebels, the real loyalists (Times)

Downing Street expects unswerving obedience, but without the awkward squad we’d be at war – and have dearer petrol, writes Tm Montgomerie.

3. A broken union would unsettle Northern Ireland (Financial Times)

A Scottish Yes vote would open constitutional question at a delicate time, writes Jonathan Powell.

4. We need a counterweight to City and corporate power (Guardian)

Any further weakening of Labour's links with the unions will only deepen the crisis of representation in the political system, says Seumas Milne.

5. As an island nation, we will in the end have to accept that the sea will continue to reshape our landscape (Independent)

It is unrealistic to fortify the whole of the south west and flood defences obstruct open views, writes Mary Dejevsky.

6. We may soon learn France's real role in the Rwanda genocide (Guardian)

In a milestone court case in Paris, unprecedented testimony could reveal the Elysée's links to the 1994 génocidaires, writes Linda Melvern.

7. Carney must avoid more unforced error (Financial Times)

The BoE hitched its wagon to unemployment when what it really cared about was recovery, writes Chris Giles.

8. The Education Secretary is right to take on teacher 'Blobbledegook’ (Daily Telegraph)

Michael Gove takes the outdated view that teaching and learning is the job description of schools, writes Allison Pearson. He deserves all our support.

9. Payment Protection (Times)

Reducing the national debt is not optional for Britain; it is essential to sustainable recovery, argues a Times editorial.

10. Bitcoin is more than a speculators’ currency (Financial Times)

People could gain ownership rights to digital goods similar to physical ones, writes John Gapper.

Getty Images.
Show Hide image

Tory Brexiter Daniel Hannan: Leave campaign never promised "radical decline" in immigration

The voters might not agree...

BBC Newsnight on Twitter

It was the Leave campaign's pledge to reduce EU immigration that won it the referendum. But Daniel Hannan struck a rather different tone on last night's Newsnight. "It means free movement of labour," the Conservative MEP said of the post-Brexit model he envisaged. An exasperated Evan Davis replied: “I’m sorry we’ve just been through three months of agony on the issue of immigration. The public have been led to believe that what they have voted for is an end to free movement." 

Hannan protested that EU migrants would lose "legal entitlements to live in other countries, to vote in other countries and to claim welfare and to have the same university tuition". But Davis wasn't backing down. "Why didn't you say this in the campaign? Why didn't you say in the campaign that you were wanting a scheme where we have free movement of labour? Come on, that's completely at odds with what the public think they have just voted for." 

Hannan concluded: "We never said there was going to be some radical decline ... we want a measure of control". Your Mole suspects many voters assumed otherwise. If immigration is barely changed, Hannan and others will soon be burned by the very fires they stoked. 

I'm a mole, innit.