Show Hide image

Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. Smart Alex Salmond has had a nasty run-in with reality (Daily Telegraph)

The latest assault from London on keeping the pound and Brussels on joining the EU has left the SNP leader bruised and battered, writes Alan Cochrane. 

2. With seven months to go to the Scottish referendum, the scaremongering has begun (Guardian)

It is simply not true that an independent Scotland would get no place in the EU or a currency union, says Angus Roxburgh. We need facts not scare tactics.

3. Clegg may be batting his eyelashes at Labour, but he won't turn a cold shoulder on the Tories (Independent)

The key issue in any future negotiations for a coalition is the precise context in which they take place, not Clegg’s politics, writes Steve Richards. 

4. How we ended up paying farmers to flood our homes (Guardian)

This government let the farming lobby rip up the rulebook on soil protection – and now we are suffering the consequences, says George Monbiot.

5. The storms reveal how little governments can do (Financial Times)

We have come to see the state as omnipotent in the face of any problem, writes Janan Ganesh. 

6. Cameron's student visa policy is a disastrous own goal (Guardian)

The prime minister's careless immigration pledge is putting off some of our brightest visitors – and damaging Britain, says Timothy Garton Ash.

7. Scotland can be a model for how to split (Financial Times)

There are remarkably few examples of nations breaking up in a civilised way, writes Gideon Rachman. 

8. Salmond’s case for keeping sterling is bluster and abuse (Times)

By the SNP’s logic Britain should adopt the dollar, writes John McTernan. 

9. Fashion is one of the most hyper-capitalist businesses (Guardian)

Haute couture is one of the very few businesses allowed to present itself as not being wholly about commerce, but the facts say otherwise, writes Aditya Chakrabortty.

10. Clegg’s Dangerous Shift (Times)

In his attempt to woo the left, the Deputy Prime Minister risks losing voters in southern and rural constituencies, says a Times editorial. 

New Statesman
Show Hide image

Quiz: Can you identify fake news?

The furore around "fake" news shows no sign of abating. Can you spot what's real and what's not?

Hillary Clinton has spoken out today to warn about the fake news epidemic sweeping the world. Clinton went as far as to say that "lives are at risk" from fake news, the day after Pope Francis compared reading fake news to eating poop. (Side note: with real news like that, who needs the fake stuff?)

The sweeping distrust in fake news has caused some confusion, however, as many are unsure about how to actually tell the reals and the fakes apart. Short from seeing whether the logo will scratch off and asking the man from the market where he got it from, how can you really identify fake news? Take our test to see whether you have all the answers.

 

 

In all seriousness, many claim that identifying fake news is a simple matter of checking the source and disbelieving anything "too good to be true". Unfortunately, however, fake news outlets post real stories too, and real news outlets often slip up and publish the fakes. Use fact-checking websites like Snopes to really get to the bottom of a story, and always do a quick Google before you share anything. 

Amelia Tait is a technology and digital culture writer at the New Statesman.