Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. We can’t afford to ignore climate change (Financial Times)

As the Philippines recovers, fossil-fuel lobbies focus on the short term, writes Jeffrey Sachs.

2. Why even atheists should be praying for Pope Francis (Guardian)

Francis could replace Obama as the pin-up on every liberal and leftist wall, says Jonathan Freedland. He is now the world's clearest voice for change.

3. Steady at the helm there, Mr Cameron (Times)

If the PM is feeling the pressure from the Tory right, he needs to quell the ranks and steer the ship, writes Matthew Parris.

4. If Labour want to start apologising, it shouldn't be over economic migration (Guardian)

Jack Straw's admission of guilt over deciding to allow economic migration in 2004 is disingenuous, and sidesteps the real mistakes they made, says Deborah Orr.

5. A glasnost moment? Unlikely. The Chinese remember what happened to the Soviets (Independent)

Shining through the new document is Mr Xi’s determination to retain and bolster the Communist Party’s hold on power, writes Peter Popham.

6. The coalition is steadily coming undone (Independent)

Ed Miliband's pledge last month to freeze energy prices has not only dominated headlines, it has driven a wedge between the Tories and the Lib Dems, says Andrew Grice.

7. Is the economic recovery built to last? (Times)

Instead of a Germanic economy built on manufacturing, our recovery risks resembling Spain’s property boom, says Stephen King.

8. The lessons gone unlearnt at Westminster (Daily Telegraph)

The fallibility of MPs Nadine Dorries and Nadhim Zahawi is regrettably familiar, writes Vicki Woods.

9. A bet against London is no sure thing (Financial Times)

There is far more to the British capital than hot money and hot air, writes Tim Harford.

10. Why does a brush with death make people turn to religion? (Daily Telegraph)

Sir John Tavener’s final broadcast brought home with force the truths of faith, argues Charles Moore.

Photo: Getty
Show Hide image

Cabinet audit: what does the appointment of Liam Fox as International Trade Secretary mean for policy?

The political and policy-based implications of the new Secretary of State for International Trade.

Only Nixon, it is said, could have gone to China. Only a politician with the impeccable Commie-bashing credentials of the 37th President had the political capital necessary to strike a deal with the People’s Republic of China.

Theresa May’s great hope is that only Liam Fox, the newly-installed Secretary of State for International Trade, has the Euro-bashing credentials to break the news to the Brexiteers that a deal between a post-Leave United Kingdom and China might be somewhat harder to negotiate than Vote Leave suggested.

The biggest item on the agenda: striking a deal that allows Britain to stay in the single market. Elsewhere, Fox should use his political capital with the Conservative right to wait longer to sign deals than a Remainer would have to, to avoid the United Kingdom being caught in a series of bad deals. 

Stephen Bush is special correspondent at the New Statesman. He usually writes about politics.