The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

RSS

Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. At the G8 a problem shared is a problem shelved (Times)

Adam Boulton looks ahead to the G8 without much hope for change.

2. A swing of the handbag reveals Mrs May's ambition (Telegraph)

David Cameron is relaxed about his colleagues wanting the top job. Just as well, says Matthew D'Ancona, as the Home Secretary has made it clear she believes she could lead the Tories.

3. The limits of Chinese parochialism (South China Morning Post)

Philip Bowring urges Beijing to see itself as more than an Asian power and to play a positive role in world affairs, while stressing that in light of Edward Snowden's presence, Hong Kong must get over its fixation with mainland China and the West.

4. Let's capitalise on the social enterprise boom (Independent)

Nick Hurd stresses importance of businesses and organisations that use profit to help to find better social solutions.

5. Bring on a British revolution - it's long overdue (Observer)

We've never managed more than a few riots – we need something more radical, says Kevin McKenna

6. Bad Idea, Mr President (IHT)

Syria is like Iraq, only worse, writes Ramzy Mardini, and arming the rebels will pour fuel on the fire.

7. Natural justice faces a savage loss of innocence (Observer)

Plans to reduce legal aid are an unwarranted assault on the very nature of our legal system, writes Nick Cohen.

8. Fight back youngsters, Gran is mugging you (Times)

After paying the pensions and health bills of older Britons, today’s generation can’t even afford their own homes.

9. Homer Simpson isn't a positive role model for kids? Eat my shorts... (Observer)

The report criticising TV comedies for their negative depictions of fathers is at once joyless and opportunistic, says David Mitchell.

10. Money calls the shots in state schools (Telegraph)

The Government refuses to increase selection on academic ability, writes Jenny McCartney, so we select instead on the basis of wealth, which is apparently more acceptable.