Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. At the G8 a problem shared is a problem shelved (Times)

Adam Boulton looks ahead to the G8 without much hope for change.

2. A swing of the handbag reveals Mrs May's ambition (Telegraph)

David Cameron is relaxed about his colleagues wanting the top job. Just as well, says Matthew D'Ancona, as the Home Secretary has made it clear she believes she could lead the Tories.

3. The limits of Chinese parochialism (South China Morning Post)

Philip Bowring urges Beijing to see itself as more than an Asian power and to play a positive role in world affairs, while stressing that in light of Edward Snowden's presence, Hong Kong must get over its fixation with mainland China and the West.

4. Let's capitalise on the social enterprise boom (Independent)

Nick Hurd stresses importance of businesses and organisations that use profit to help to find better social solutions.

5. Bring on a British revolution - it's long overdue (Observer)

We've never managed more than a few riots – we need something more radical, says Kevin McKenna

6. Bad Idea, Mr President (IHT)

Syria is like Iraq, only worse, writes Ramzy Mardini, and arming the rebels will pour fuel on the fire.

7. Natural justice faces a savage loss of innocence (Observer)

Plans to reduce legal aid are an unwarranted assault on the very nature of our legal system, writes Nick Cohen.

8. Fight back youngsters, Gran is mugging you (Times)

After paying the pensions and health bills of older Britons, today’s generation can’t even afford their own homes.

9. Homer Simpson isn't a positive role model for kids? Eat my shorts... (Observer)

The report criticising TV comedies for their negative depictions of fathers is at once joyless and opportunistic, says David Mitchell.

10. Money calls the shots in state schools (Telegraph)

The Government refuses to increase selection on academic ability, writes Jenny McCartney, so we select instead on the basis of wealth, which is apparently more acceptable.

Getty Images.
Show Hide image

PMQs review: Jeremy Corbyn turns "the nasty party" back on Theresa May

The Labour leader exploited Conservative splits over disability benefits.

It didn't take long for Theresa May to herald the Conservatives' Copeland by-election victory at PMQs (and one couldn't blame her). But Jeremy Corbyn swiftly brought her down to earth. The Labour leader denounced the government for "sneaking out" its decision to overrule a court judgement calling for Personal Independence Payments (PIPs) to be extended to those with severe mental health problems.

Rather than merely expressing his own outrage, Corbyn drew on that of others. He smartly quoted Tory backbencher Heidi Allen, one of the tax credit rebels, who has called on May to "think agan" and "honour" the court's rulings. The Prime Minister protested that the government was merely returning PIPs to their "original intention" and was already spending more than ever on those with mental health conditions. But Corbyn had more ammunition, denouncing Conservative policy chair George Freeman for his suggestion that those "taking pills" for anxiety aren't "really disabled". After May branded Labour "the nasty party" in her conference speech, Corbyn suggested that the Tories were once again worthy of her epithet.

May emphasised that Freeman had apologised and, as so often, warned that the "extra support" promised by Labour would be impossible without the "strong economy" guaranteed by the Conservatives. "The one thing we know about Labour is that they would bankrupt Britain," she declared. Unlike on previous occasions, Corbyn had a ready riposte, reminding the Tories that they had increased the national debt by more than every previous Labour government.

But May saved her jibe of choice for the end, recalling shadow cabinet minister Cat Smith's assertion that the Copeland result was an "incredible achivement" for her party. "I think that word actually sums up the Right Honourable Gentleman's leadership. In-cred-ible," May concluded, with a rather surreal Thatcher-esque flourish.

Yet many economists and EU experts say the same of her Brexit plan. Having repeatedly hailed the UK's "strong economy" (which has so far proved resilient), May had better hope that single market withdrawal does not wreck it. But on Brexit, as on disability benefits, it is Conservative rebels, not Corbyn, who will determine her fate.

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.