Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. Labour is betting everything on its new brand of pothole politics (Daily Telegraph)

Ed Miliband hopes local activism and 'viral’ recruitment will be an antidote to voter apathy, writes Mary Riddell.

2. How can prisoners 'work harder' when they've got nothing to do? (Guardian)

It may not be what he intended, but Chris Grayling's criticism exposes the flaws of privately run prisons, says Frances Crook.

3.  I hate Abu Qatada too – but the law’s the law (Times)

Do we seriously want the Home Secretary to ignore the pesky courts and just shove this man on a plane, asks Daniel Finkelstein.

4. Young IDS should pick his battles with care (Daily Telegraph)

Only a foolhardy politician would ask pensioners to sacrifice their free bus pass, says Joan Bakewell.

5. Why the Baltic states are no model (Financial Times)

What is possible for small, open economies is close to impossible for the large and relatively closed, writes Martin Wolf.

6. Michael Gove is winning the hearts of state heads (Daily Telegraph)

Teaching unions don’t want you to know, but head teachers support Michael Gove's education reforms, says Anthony Seldon.

7. Ed Miliband will fail if he locks himself into Tory austerity (Guardian)

Falling living standards make Labour favourite to win the next election, writes Seumas Milne. It needs policies to match the scale of the crisis.

8. Vive la change between us and the French (Daily Mail)

An Anglo-French alliance as reformers of the EU may yet come to pass, says Andrew Alexander.

9. Cash-hungry countries have encouraged the rise of tax havens (Independent)

A desire to protect the oppressed, and generate revenue, has got us to here, writes Hamish McRae.

10. What Queen Elizabeth can learn from Queen Beatrix (Guardian)

Britain's monarch enjoys huge support – but therein is the royals' vulnerability, writes Simon Jenkins. They should look to the Netherlands.

Getty
Show Hide image

Could Jeremy Corbyn still be excluded from the leadership race? The High Court will rule today

Labour donor Michael Foster has applied for a judgement. 

If you thought Labour's National Executive Committee's decision to let Jeremy Corbyn automatically run again for leader was the end of it, think again. 

Today, the High Court will decide whether the NEC made the right judgement - or if Corbyn should have been forced to seek nominations from 51 MPs, which would effectively block him from the ballot.

The legal challenge is brought by Michael Foster, a Labour donor and former parliamentary candidate. Corbyn is listed as one of the defendants.

Before the NEC decision, both Corbyn's team and the rebel MPs sought legal advice.

Foster has maintained he is simply seeking the views of experts. 

Nevertheless, he has clashed with Corbyn before. He heckled the Labour leader, whose party has been racked with anti-Semitism scandals, at a Labour Friends of Israel event in September 2015, where he demanded: "Say the word Israel."

But should the judge decide in favour of Foster, would the Labour leadership challenge really be over?

Dr Peter Catterall, a reader in history at Westminster University and a specialist in opposition studies, doesn't think so. He said: "The Labour party is a private institution, so unless they are actually breaking the law, it seems to me it is about how you interpret the rules of the party."

Corbyn's bid to be personally mentioned on the ballot paper was a smart move, he said, and the High Court's decision is unlikely to heal wounds.

 "You have to ask yourself, what is the point of doing this? What does success look like?" he said. "Will it simply reinforce the idea that Mr Corbyn is being made a martyr by people who are out to get him?"