Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. Labour is betting everything on its new brand of pothole politics (Daily Telegraph)

Ed Miliband hopes local activism and 'viral’ recruitment will be an antidote to voter apathy, writes Mary Riddell.

2. How can prisoners 'work harder' when they've got nothing to do? (Guardian)

It may not be what he intended, but Chris Grayling's criticism exposes the flaws of privately run prisons, says Frances Crook.

3.  I hate Abu Qatada too – but the law’s the law (Times)

Do we seriously want the Home Secretary to ignore the pesky courts and just shove this man on a plane, asks Daniel Finkelstein.

4. Young IDS should pick his battles with care (Daily Telegraph)

Only a foolhardy politician would ask pensioners to sacrifice their free bus pass, says Joan Bakewell.

5. Why the Baltic states are no model (Financial Times)

What is possible for small, open economies is close to impossible for the large and relatively closed, writes Martin Wolf.

6. Michael Gove is winning the hearts of state heads (Daily Telegraph)

Teaching unions don’t want you to know, but head teachers support Michael Gove's education reforms, says Anthony Seldon.

7. Ed Miliband will fail if he locks himself into Tory austerity (Guardian)

Falling living standards make Labour favourite to win the next election, writes Seumas Milne. It needs policies to match the scale of the crisis.

8. Vive la change between us and the French (Daily Mail)

An Anglo-French alliance as reformers of the EU may yet come to pass, says Andrew Alexander.

9. Cash-hungry countries have encouraged the rise of tax havens (Independent)

A desire to protect the oppressed, and generate revenue, has got us to here, writes Hamish McRae.

10. What Queen Elizabeth can learn from Queen Beatrix (Guardian)

Britain's monarch enjoys huge support – but therein is the royals' vulnerability, writes Simon Jenkins. They should look to the Netherlands.

Getty Images.
Show Hide image

The US intelligence leaks on the Manchester attack are part of a disturbing pattern

Even the United States' strongest allies cannot rely on this president or his administration to keep their secrets.

A special relationship, indeed. British intelligence services will stop sharing information with their American counterparts about the Manchester bombing after leaks persisted even after public rebukes from Amber Rudd (who called the leaks "irritating") and Michael Fallon (who branded them "disappointing").

In what must be a diplomatic first, Britain isn't even the first of the United States' allies to review its intelligence sharing protocols this week. The Israeli government have also "reviewed" their approach to intelligence sharing with Washington after Donald Trump first blabbed information about Isis to the Russian ambassador from a "close ally" of the United States and then told reporters, unprompted, that he had "never mentioned Israel" in the conversation.

Whether the Manchester leaks emanate from political officials appointed by Trump - many of whom tend to be, if you're feeling generous, cranks of the highest order - or discontent with Trump has caused a breakdown in discipline further down the chain, what's clear is that something is very rotten in the Trump administration.

Elsewhere, a transcript of Trump's call to the Philippine strongman Rodrigo Duterte in which the American president revealed that two nuclear submarines had been deployed off the coast of North Korea, has been widely leaked to the American press

It's all part of a clear and disturbing pattern, that even the United States' strongest allies in Tel Aviv and London cannot rely on this president or his administration to keep their secrets.

Stephen Bush is special correspondent at the New Statesman. His daily briefing, Morning Call, provides a quick and essential guide to British politics.

0800 7318496