Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. Miliband the illusionist must conjure up more with less (Daily Telegraph)

The Labour Party must convince the voters that saving money can produce social dividends, says Mary Riddell.

2. It's time the Tories learned to love the unions (Guardian)

Nostalgia for a tussle with the unions still excites some, writes David Skelton. But modern Conservatives need to befriend, not alienate them.

3. Austerity loses an article of faith (Financial Times)

The UK industrial revolution shows the Reinhart-Rogoff thesis on debt is not always right, says Martin Wolf.

4. Even if he loses, Alex Salmond will still win (Times)

Whichever way Scotland votes on independence, the First Minister will wrest more power away from Westminster, writes Alice Thomson. 

5. Shaker Aamer and the dirty secrets of the war on terror (Guardian)

The scandal of Britain's last Guantánamo inmate encapsulates the barbarity of a mutating conflict without end, says Seumas Milne.

6. Sovereign Scots may have to drop sterling (Financial Times)

Edinburgh should try to secure monetary union with England, but it would probably fail, argues John Kay.

7. France's meltdown is a stark warning to anyone who wants Red Ed as PM (Daily Mail)

Labour is promising precisely the same policies as Hollande’s socialists, writes Daniel Hannan.

8. If Abenomics works, Britain's leaders will look like monkeys (Guardian)

George Osborne should abandon the tribal morality of austerity and, like Japan, print money not for banks but for people, says Simon Jenkins.

9. A state-sector version of Eton is long overdue (Independent)

But it is not clear that the practicalities of the Durand scheme have been thought through, says an Independent editorial.

10. Our US protector is looking the other way (Daily Telegraph)

The free-riding nations of Europe are making a big mistake by slashing their defence budgets, argues David Blair.

Photo: Getty
Show Hide image

Cabinet audit: what does the appointment of Liam Fox as International Trade Secretary mean for policy?

The political and policy-based implications of the new Secretary of State for International Trade.

Only Nixon, it is said, could have gone to China. Only a politician with the impeccable Commie-bashing credentials of the 37th President had the political capital necessary to strike a deal with the People’s Republic of China.

Theresa May’s great hope is that only Liam Fox, the newly-installed Secretary of State for International Trade, has the Euro-bashing credentials to break the news to the Brexiteers that a deal between a post-Leave United Kingdom and China might be somewhat harder to negotiate than Vote Leave suggested.

The biggest item on the agenda: striking a deal that allows Britain to stay in the single market. Elsewhere, Fox should use his political capital with the Conservative right to wait longer to sign deals than a Remainer would have to, to avoid the United Kingdom being caught in a series of bad deals. 

Stephen Bush is special correspondent at the New Statesman. He usually writes about politics.