Morning Call: pick of the papers
The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.
1. There's no need for all this economic sadomasochism (Guardian)
If Reinhart and Rogoff's 'error' has discredited the prevailing policy dogma, now is the time for an alternative that works, says David Graeber.
2. Our shameful hierarchy - some deaths matter more than others (Independent)
Why is the slaughter in Boston more shocking or newsworthy than the deaths in Iraq, asks Owen Jones.
It is not enough to win the policy argument, says Tim Montgomerie. Conservatives need to show their thinking has a moral dimension too.
4. Case for a Little England stance on Syria (Financial Times)
Heed the lessons from interventions that turned bad, writes Max Hastings.
The greatest threat to US citizens is not one-off terror attacks, but the menace that comes with mass gun-ownership, says Gary Younge.
6. It’s hard to tell jihad from immature rage (Times)
The Boston bombers may have been driven more by a warped desire for notoriety than by real fanaticism, writes Gaby Hinsliff.
7. We can’t afford to ignore our dynamic friends in the East (Daily Telegraph)
The Gulf is booming, its people love Britain and they want to invest here, writes Boris Johnson. Let’s encourage them.
8. Labour and Scotland: a tie that binds (Guardian)
If the rhetoric of one nation is to mean something, much is to be said for caution over cutting such a strong link, says a Guardian editorial.
9. IMF boss turns on the Chancellor to hide her own sins (Daily Mail)
Lagarde and the IMF are engaged in a huge effort to play down, or at least distract attention from, the catastrophic state of economic affairs in France – and indeed the eurozone as a whole, says Alex Brummer.
10. The wrong way on child poverty (Independent)
More discussion about definitions of poverty would be welcome, says an Independent editorial. But it must not become an excuse for cynically moving the goalposts.