Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. The Prime Minister's speech on the economy asserted the incredible in defense of the indefensible (Independent)

There are many credible alternatives to the current stance of economic policy, which would deal with the deficit while promoting growth, argue David Blanchflower and Adam Posen.

2. Theresa May-nia won’t become contagious (Times) (£)

The Home Secretary has the grit to be an accomplished PM but her lack of warmth will stop her reaching No 10, says Tim Montgomerie.

3. Cameron's days at No 10 may be numbered, but the national agenda is still set by the right (Independent)

The Prime Minister is surrounded by ideological crusaders and they've succeeded in turning the politically impossible into the politically inevitable, says Owen Jones.

4. Britain needs an activist chancellor (Financial Times)

The coalition government should do more to boost growth, says an FT editorial.

5. The Falklands: a vote with no purpose (Guardian)

Britain is alone in the world if it thinks that the Malvinas referendum will decide this dispute, writes Alicia Castro.

6. A good engineer who knows his own limits (Financial Times)

Ben Bernanke’s Fed has been the only serious US economic actor, says Edward Luce.

7. David Cameron may last even as he leads his MPs to their doom (Guardian)

Tory backbenchers fear a repeat of 1997 at the next election. But that doesn't mean any of them have the courage to act on it, writes Gaby Hinsliff.

8. Ed dreams of win... don’t let him in (Sun)

David Cameron has plenty of room for manoeuvre, says Trevor Kavanagh. But he cannot count on the unpopularity of Ed Miliband to hand him victory.

9. Justice is put to the sword by Moscow’s greed and corruption (Daily Telegraph)

The ludicrous 'trial’ of a whistleblower killed for his pains ranks among Russia’s darkest hours, writes Boris Johnson.

10. Liberal Democrats: heartlands (Guardian)

Nick Clegg still feels the sacrifices are worth it, but this is becoming an increasingly difficult line to sustain, says a Guardian editorial.

Getty
Show Hide image

Benn vs McDonnell: how Brexit has exposed the fight over Labour's party machine

In the wake of Brexit, should Labour MPs listen more closely to voters, or their own party members?

Two Labour MPs on primetime TV. Two prominent politicians ruling themselves out of a Labour leadership contest. But that was as far as the similarity went.

Hilary Benn was speaking hours after he resigned - or was sacked - from the Shadow Cabinet. He described Jeremy Corbyn as a "good and decent man" but not a leader.

Framing his overnight removal as a matter of conscience, Benn told the BBC's Andrew Marr: "I no longer have confidence in him [Corbyn] and I think the right thing to do would be for him to take that decision."

In Benn's view, diehard leftie pin ups do not go down well in the real world, or on the ballot papers of middle England. 

But while Benn may be drawing on a New Labour truism, this in turn rests on the assumption that voters matter more than the party members when it comes to winning elections.

That assumption was contested moments later by Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell.

Dismissive of the personal appeal of Shadow Cabinet ministers - "we can replace them" - McDonnell's message was that Labour under Corbyn had rejuvenated its electoral machine.

Pointing to success in by-elections and the London mayoral election, McDonnell warned would-be rebels: "Who is sovereign in our party? The people who are soverign are the party members. 

"I'm saying respect the party members. And in that way we can hold together and win the next election."

Indeed, nearly a year on from Corbyn's surprise election to the Labour leadership, it is worth remembering he captured nearly 60% of the 400,000 votes cast. Momentum, the grassroots organisation formed in the wake of his success, now has more than 50 branches around the country.

Come the next election, it will be these grassroots members who will knock on doors, hand out leaflets and perhaps even threaten to deselect MPs.

The question for wavering Labour MPs will be whether what they trust more - their own connection with voters, or this potentially unbiddable party machine.