Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. The Cyprus eurozone bailout conditions are bank robbery pure and simple (Guardian)

This is yet another euro bailout that punishes ordinary people to prop up a bust financial system, writes Aditya Chakrabortty. How long can the euro last now?

2. Press battle thaws Labour-Lib Dem frost (Financial Times)

This could in future be seen as the dawn of a new coalition, writes Janan Ganesh.

3. Across the Rubicon (Times)

David Cameron’s Royal Charter subjects a free press to Parliament and sets a dangerous precedent, argues a Times leader.

4. A Leveson deal worth backing (Independent)

It is not credible to claim that the existing form of self-regulation was working, says an Independent editorial.

5. Politicians and press regulation: a good deal on paper … (Guardian)

The political class as a whole could discover that the brokering has only just begun, says a Guardian editorial.

6. Crosby’s cunning plan for a Tory victory – no more stupid ideas (Daily Telegraph)

There will be no more nods to fashion that leave voters on the right mystified or angry, says Benedict Brogan.

7. In the war on the poor, Pope Francis is on the wrong side (Guardian)

In Latin America a new Inquisition has betrayed Catholic priests who risk their lives to stand up to tyrants – as I've witnessed, writes George Monbiot. 

8. Europe’s leaders run out of credit in Cyprus (Financial Times)

The problem remains the gap in trust between north and south, says Gideon Rachman.

9. Will Britain's press repent its nasty ways? Don't hold your breath (Guardian)

A small triumph for citizens the royal charter may be, but for now we're still stuck with the most savage papers in Europe, says Polly Toynbee.

10. Forget privacy – it’s conversation Google is killing (Independent)

Google Glass will make its users even more detached from the immediate real world, writes Dominic Lawson. 

Getty
Show Hide image

Could Jeremy Corbyn still be excluded from the leadership race? The High Court will rule today

Labour donor Michael Foster has applied for a judgement. 

If you thought Labour's National Executive Committee's decision to let Jeremy Corbyn automatically run again for leader was the end of it, think again. 

Today, the High Court will decide whether the NEC made the right judgement - or if Corbyn should have been forced to seek nominations from 51 MPs, which would effectively block him from the ballot.

The legal challenge is brought by Michael Foster, a Labour donor and former parliamentary candidate. Corbyn is listed as one of the defendants.

Before the NEC decision, both Corbyn's team and the rebel MPs sought legal advice.

Foster has maintained he is simply seeking the views of experts. 

Nevertheless, he has clashed with Corbyn before. He heckled the Labour leader, whose party has been racked with anti-Semitism scandals, at a Labour Friends of Israel event in September 2015, where he demanded: "Say the word Israel."

But should the judge decide in favour of Foster, would the Labour leadership challenge really be over?

Dr Peter Catterall, a reader in history at Westminster University and a specialist in opposition studies, doesn't think so. He said: "The Labour party is a private institution, so unless they are actually breaking the law, it seems to me it is about how you interpret the rules of the party."

Corbyn's bid to be personally mentioned on the ballot paper was a smart move, he said, and the High Court's decision is unlikely to heal wounds.

 "You have to ask yourself, what is the point of doing this? What does success look like?" he said. "Will it simply reinforce the idea that Mr Corbyn is being made a martyr by people who are out to get him?"