Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.

1. Brass tax (The Times)
Tax avoidance harms the economy - this week's developments have been welcome, says a Times editorial

2. Cameron and Chakrabarti treat press freedom as sacred (Independent)
But aren't some things more important, asks Howard Jacobson

3. Michael Gove does not deserve to be hailed as a rising star (Guardian)
His policies are bad for children and a waste of money, says Peter Wilby

4. A lot of froth over Starbucks (Telegraph)
The row over multinational tax affairs is a distraction from reducing state spending, says a Telegraph leader

5. Pay shake-up offers hope to the regions (Mail)
There's been a step towards closing the divide between the south east and the rest of Britain, says a Daily Mail leader

6. Things can only get worse. Vote Tory. (The TImes)
If Osborne brings recovery, he'll lose the next election for his party, says Matthew Parris

7. Syria and the truth about chemical weapons (Independent)
Do you know which army was the first to use gas in the Middle East, asks Robert Fisk

8. The search for paedophiles is more carnival than witch-hunt (Guardian)
Light entertainment is being turned upside down by a raucous mob, says Hannah Betts

9. David Cameron's trouble with being modern (Telegraph)
The PM must adapt, but he risks ignoring what is important, argues Charles Moore

10. Clegg is oblivious of the damage of high taxation to growth (Daily Mail)
The Deputy Prime Minister is a disaster for Britain, says Robin Harris

Morning Call
Getty Images.
Show Hide image

Voters are turning against Brexit but the Lib Dems aren't benefiting

Labour's pro-Brexit stance is not preventing it from winning the support of Remainers. Will that change?

More than a year after the UK voted for Brexit, there has been little sign of buyer's remorse. The public, including around a third of Remainers, are largely of the view that the government should "get on with it".

But as real wages are squeezed (owing to the Brexit-linked inflationary spike) there are tentative signs that the mood is changing. In the event of a second referendum, an Opinium/Observer poll found, 47 per cent would vote Remain, compared to 44 per cent for Leave. Support for a repeat vote is also increasing. Forty one per cent of the public now favour a second referendum (with 48 per cent opposed), compared to 33 per cent last December. 

The Liberal Democrats have made halting Brexit their raison d'être. But as public opinion turns, there is no sign they are benefiting. Since the election, Vince Cable's party has yet to exceed single figures in the polls, scoring a lowly 6 per cent in the Opinium survey (down from 7.4 per cent at the election). 

What accounts for this disparity? After their near-extinction in 2015, the Lib Dems remain either toxic or irrelevant to many voters. Labour, by contrast, despite its pro-Brexit stance, has hoovered up Remainers (55 per cent back Jeremy Corbyn's party). 

In some cases, this reflects voters' other priorities. Remainers are prepared to support Labour on account of the party's stances on austerity, housing and education. Corbyn, meanwhile, is a eurosceptic whose internationalism and pro-migration reputation endear him to EU supporters. Other Remainers rewarded Labour MPs who voted against Article 50, rebelling against the leadership's stance. 

But the trend also partly reflects ignorance. By saying little on the subject of Brexit, Corbyn and Labour allowed Remainers to assume the best. Though there is little evidence that voters will abandon Corbyn over his EU stance, the potential exists.

For this reason, the proposal of a new party will continue to recur. By challenging Labour over Brexit, without the toxicity of Lib Dems, it would sharpen the choice before voters. Though it would not win an election, a new party could force Corbyn to soften his stance on Brexit or to offer a second referendum (mirroring Ukip's effect on the Conservatives).

The greatest problem for the project is that it lacks support where it counts: among MPs. For reasons of tribalism and strategy, there is no emergent "Gang of Four" ready to helm a new party. In the absence of a new convulsion, the UK may turn against Brexit without the anti-Brexiteers benefiting. 

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.