The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

We can now elect police officers: but will anyone bother?

Let’s not waste this opportunity.

The old days are over: a policeman in 1913. Photograph: Getty Images
The old days are over: a policeman in 1913. Photograph: Getty Images

It is now less than a month until the first police and crime commissioners are elected across the country. The policing minister Damien Green has described this as “the most significant democratic reform of policing in our lifetime”, and yet there is a real danger that hardly anybody, especially young people like me, will turn out to vote. Indeed, yesterday saw former Metropolitan Police Chief Sir Ian Blair urge us to boycott the election, telling Sky News “I actually hope people don’t vote because that is the only way we are going to stop this”.

Sir Ian is wrong: the Home Secretary has repeatedly stated that the elections will be legitimate whatever the turnout. The reforms are going ahead. However, there is a real danger that he will get at least part of his wish. The Electoral Reform Society recently estimated that only 18.5 per cent of the electorate will brave the November chill and head to the polls. Surveys suggest that 82 per cent don’t know who their candidates are, and the figures are probably even higher for us traditionally apathetic young people. An informal poll of friends in my home constituency of Essex drew nothing but blank expressions, and polite but uninterested questions as to what a ‘police and crime commissioner’ actually was.

This is a concern, because we are precisely the age group that should be paying the most attention to the election of PCCs. As research by the Transition to Adulthood Alliance shows, young people (16-24) are disproportionately likely to come into contact with the police, and are massively overrepresented in the criminal justice system – we make up 10 per cent of the population but one-third of those commencing a community sentence, one-third on the probation caseload and almost one-third of those sentenced to prison each year. We are also the most likely age group to be a victim of crime; 31.8 per cent of young people were victims of a crime in 2011.

The decisions PCCs will make will therefore have a disproportionate impact on us. The introduction of PCCs, however, also provides us with a huge opportunity to have our voices heard directly. PCCs have a duty to engage with the whole community, and hold the local chief constable to account on their behalf. They can set strategic priorities, and shine a light on poor practice in policing locally. This election is a chance to raise those issues around policing and crime that matter most to young people.

Despite the apathy about PCC elections, many young people have strong feelings towards the police, whether this is to do with the policing of protests or feeling marginalized and bullied by the police presence in their community. Young people involved in the riots, interviewed as part of the Guardian and LSE report, commonly cited anger at the police as a cause of their behaviour.  

Stop and search is one such issue highlighted in the riots report. These powers were used more than a million times by police in 2009/10, with a crime detection rate of just 9 per cent. We are more likely than any other age group to be stopped, while it is well known that black and ethnic minority groups in particular are disproportionately stopped. Organizations such as StopWatch are already lobbying candidates on these issues, and young people should take this opportunity, and use their vote, to push for a change in the way we are policed.

Other issues that are likely to have a disproportionate effect on young people are already being discussed. Candidates are issuing their manifestos and taking to social media to share their thoughts on issues such as zero-tolerance policing, anti-social behaviour and the policing of town centres at night. Candidates are already talking about us, even if we are largely not listening yet. Last year’s riots, as well as pervading negative perceptions of young people as "yobs" and "hoodies", make us a hot topic for some PCCs, particularly those who want to sound "tough on crime".

A boycott will not change these perceptions. It is vital that we do not let this national conversation on policing and crime become yet another case of politicians talking about us, but not with us. Young people need to grasp this opportunity to engage, register and vote, and get involved – move the debate beyond its current stale focus on turnout and implementation and have a say in how we are policed. Let’s not waste this opportunity.

6 comments

bill23's picture

The police, or at least the chief constable of Dorset has been involved in a planning scam for some time now, but if we give examples in the charlesstreetpetition.org.uk petition for example, they are pulled. The establishment thinks it is doing good by covering up, and everything in Dorset leads one to suspect that a commissioner will just be part of the effort to make the police and the great & good look as if they are not just in it to line their pockets.

Robbie's Pies's picture

Er, in what possible way is it a reasonable thing to do to have the public vote in police? Surely, like every other profession it should be other police officers who, well, know about policing who should be selecting them on the merits of how capable they are? So, does anybody have any guesses on why the Tories are trying to push this madness through?

Robbie's Pies's picture

Also have a read of Barrie J's comment below.

Barrie J's picture

That the election of Police Commissioners is being sold as an extension of democracy is to put it mildly a 'Crock of Sh#t'.
Of the 196 candidates, 136 of them are from political parties, 54 standing as independents and 3 others (crime, law and order etc.).
Labour Party candidates are funded (£5000 to register plus campaigning funds) from Party funds.
How many people can lay their hands on £5k (non-refundable if less than 5% of vote gained).
We already have evidence of a Tory candidate being funded by an American security company. Just a generous gesture or would it serve their long term ambitions? Just asking.
We are not to be allowed to know the source of candidates' funding until after the election. Why?
Some of the political candidates read as a list of failed politicians keen to keep their snouts in the trough, the salary quoted being £60 - £100k per annum. The rest see it as a first step on the greasy pole of self interest.
Quote:
..........the Home Secretary has repeatedly stated that the elections will be legitimate whatever the turnout.
End quote.
Presumably Ms May would be quite happy for that statement to apply to a trade union balloting its members over strike action.
I suggest you write and ask her.
Mr Legon, I don't know how old you are but your contribution suggests that in general terms you are nearer the cradle than the grave, however if you think that the election of police commissioners is somehow going to empower young people then you are sorely mistaken.
They will either become tools of their political party, of their donors, or captured by the institution they are there to oversee.
Try asking awkward questions of your M.P. or Councillor and you will quickly see where their loyalties lie.
To describe a debate on low turn out as stale is to miss the real point. It should be of paramount importance that people vote, yet the Home Secretary seems not to care whether they do or not.
The fact is politicians are so remote from the public that they can no longer engage with them and people see no evidence that their vote changes anything.
Promises made in opposition are rarely kept and policies pursued in office frequently form no part of their manifesto
Politicians are rarely voted in but almost always voted out.
You may recall the TV series the Dukes of Hazzard and the part played by Sorrell Booke.

J.D. (Boss) Hogg's official government title was County Commissioner. Among his appointed duties was to assess and allocate county funding for whatever Hazzard County needed such as funding the police department, road repair/work, and providing funds for other government run operations/departments. Of course, being crooked, Hogg used the funds to finance his personal interests.
Thank God it was only fiction.

Hugh C Markey's picture

This and all Tory governments try to use the 'arms length' technique so close to the Mafia's business heart.
It's much harder to pin anything on the 'silent' partner. However, the US Senate does give such operations a rough ride. Oversight - House of Lords Committee? Fiddle sticks! Goodnight All!

Landed Nicely

gedon's picture

No. It's cold and damp outside.
The real damage is being done by cutting the ploice frontline and it is this 'I couldn't give a damn about ordinary folk' government, that are to blame.

Latest tweets