Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

New rules and fancies

I have this old friend, Tony, who is a dead keen Arsenal fan, wears his red woolly hat to every game, has two season tickets and often, if one of his family can't make it, lets me have a ticket, which is kind.

I have known him, oh, for 40 years. He lived opposite and seemed to work so hard, lights on in his study all night. At football games, I'm effing and blinding - "What a tosser! Gerrhimoff!" - while Tony very quietly points out flaws, weaknesses and discrepancies in the laws of football. All in a very legalistic, analytical, judgemental way, which is only fitting, as he is a retired circuit judge, Anthony Hallgarten, QC.

Here are some of his recent aperçus, as whispered in my ear at the Emirates. Will any of them make it into the football statute book in 2011?

1 Ref to indicate to goalie from which side he is to take a goal kick. We were watching Arsenal play Birmingham at the time and their goalie was playing for time by going side to side, mucking around. So, good idea, Tony.

2 New penalty for time-wasting: a green card giving the other side the option of an extra 60 seconds at the end. Nah, too complicated. We've got enough cards already.

3 Assistant ref to position himself along the line of an offence to avoid stealing ground (meaning, cheating).

4 Amend the obstruction rule (or rather, apply it sensibly). It is an offence to "impede the progress of an opponent". It should therefore be an offence for a player to screen the ball with no intention of playing it. This represents a particularly ugly and frustrating form of time-wasting. Hmm, not sure about that. Shielding the ball is part of the game.

5 Game to continue up to 45/90 minutes but play ends only if there's a throw-in or goal kick. Again, good thinking. It would keep it neat. It is annoying when the ref blows for time in the middle of a half-decent move.

6 Offsides. The benefit of the doubt should always be in favour of the attacker. The assistant referee should flag only if he's sure the attacker is in an offside position and seeking to interfere with play or gain an advantage. Applying the benefit of the doubt in this way would limit the use of ugly offside traps (we are so used to them that we see nothing wrong in defenders, faced with an attack, moving in the wrong direction).

7 Throw-ins always to be taken by the player closest to the ball. I can see the thinking - to reduce time-wasting - but it's a dopey idea. And it would do Rory Delap out of a job.

8 Couldn't the FA computer alternate dates? For example, if the season begins with a home game one year, the team would
be away the following year. Likewise, Boxing Day. It would allow fans to plan their holidays rather better but it wouldn't always work, because it would need to be adjusted for newly promoted teams.

9 Instead of penalty shoot-outs, reduce teams to nine players - and then, after 105 minutes, to seven. That should produce a result! Could be chaotic but fun.

Anyway, friends, feel free to suggest rule changes of your own. I will be the judge.

4 comments

sundjat keita's picture

Take a free-kick from the place where play was stopped. Every damn kicker tries to gain a few yards by moving the ball forward. Makes me spit!

Give opposition ten yards advantage if the side penalised argues (as in rugby).

Graham Mott's picture

1. Penalty Shoot-Outs

Obviously these are absurd, since they have nothing to do with football as we know it. It's as if a tie in snooker was resolved by the players duelling with their cues. A method is needed which relates to the game itself. Fortunately a simple expedient is available: in the event of a draw, the result should be given to the team which has won the most corners. In most games this is an excellent index of the team which has had the best of the play (it's often a better indicator than goals scored, but the object of the game is to score goals). No team ever readily concedes a corner, and it is impossible to gain one without attacking. In the rare instances that teams are level on both goals and corners after extra time, there should be a brief pause, and then play should resume until one side gains either a goal or a corner.

What are the possible objections?

The number of corners would need to be counted.
The assistant refs should keep a tally of the corners awarded at the end which they are patrolling, and agree the numbers with the ref.

Sometimes the officials get it wrong, and award a corner which should be a goal kick. Yes, but officials get all sorts of things wrong.

Sometimes a corner is followed by a goal, and it could be argued that the team gets a double benefit.
I'd say, 'so what? Do you prefer penalty shoot-outs?'

2. Offside

Abolish it. What exactly is its rationale? It is evident from TV replays that assistant refs find it impossible to give the correct decision consistently. In particular fast attacking players are often penalised when they should not be; and there are many instances where it is difficult to say what the decision should be. If players want to take up position in their opponents' six-yard box, that should be up to them. Abolition would make for more attacking play and more goals and excitement.

3. Fracas

The unseemly scenes where players all crowd round pushing and shoving and arguing after some incident must be avoided. If the ref considers that a fracas has developed, or might develop, he should give the special signal - three double peeps on his whistle. All players must then retreat to their own penalty area; anyone who has not moved within three seconds is red-carded (they might not have reached the penalty area in that time, but they must get there as quickly as they can). While they cool off, the ref can consider the original incident, with the assistants if necessary, and take whatever action he decides is appropriate.

Pi**sed off's picture

Pay MEN to play instead of these feckless pansies.
Football as we now know it is merely a display of emasculated actors lacking in depth, talent and brains.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets