A total white-out
In Britain, black people are excluded from decision-making in top-flight football. It will take more
By Martin Jacques Published 18 June 2009If you are white, you might think that English football is gloriously multiracial. After all, over a quarter of the players in
the Premiership are black and much the same is true of the lower leagues. Alas, you would be wrong. Many players are black and, predictably, so are many who do football’s menial jobs such as catering, parking and security; but after that you enter an overwhelmingly white world. Virtually all the club chairmen and directors are white. Most outrageously of all, virtually
every manager, even though they are almost always former players, is white.
This past week, John Barnes, the former England and Liverpool player – and a very memorable one at that – spoke of how, after he was sacked as Celtic manager in 2000, he was unable to get another job. Finally, on 15 June, he was named as manager of lowly Tranmere Rovers. Barnes said: “If I could have got back in one week after leaving Celtic, I would have done. While I did other things, that was not
by choice. It was because opportunities did not present themselves. I went for a fair few jobs before this, and lower down than Tranmere.”
He also said: “I think there still is a race barrier in this country. Look at how disproportionate
it is [sic] in terms of the number of black ex-players who are not in management and the number of black ex-players who are older than myself who haven’t been offered a job.”
In fact, it is worse than Barnes suggests. Apart from him, there is just one other black British manager in the whole of the Football League. There can be only one explanation: systematic discrimination by those in the boardrooms against applicants of darker skin. Take Paul Ince, another outstanding player in his time. He
tried for numerous jobs and eventually was appointed manager of Macclesfield, which at the time was bottom of the Football League and trailing by an indecent seven points. Ince managed to close the gap and ultimately save the club from relegation. On the strength of his efforts, he was appointed manager of MK Dons. In his first season he won promotion. He was then appointed manager of Blackburn Rovers, the first black British manager of a Premiership club. His tenure proved all too brief: before
the onset of winter, he was shown the door and he is still without another job.
Nor is the whites-only mentality confined
to the boardroom and management. I might be wrong, but I cannot recall there ever being a main match commentator on television – let alone a studio presenter – who was not white. The situation is marginally better when it comes to half-time pundits. Robbie Earle has been used reasonably frequently by ITV, but the BBC’s Match of the Day on Saturday evenings has long been a white redoubt. Ian Wright used to be called on for international matches but the other pundits, to be blunt, always treated him as a marginal feature, even a figure of fun. In short, the black presence in the football studios has never been more than token. And there are precious few black faces on the sports desks of our national dailies.
Discrimination and prejudice reach their zenith at the Football Association. Not a single leading official is, or ever has been, black.
Herman Ouseley was appointed last year to the 116-member Football Association council, the first ever black member and still the only one. How can the FA lay any serious claim to being a legitimate representative of a game so strikingly multiracial, when its own structures verge on
a total white-out? It would be good to think that one legacy David Triesman might bequeath the Football Association when his term as chairman ends is a more ethnically diverse organisation.
Football, alas, is hardly exceptional. The power structures of the game accord with those of other major British institutions: the preponderance of white people and the chronic under-representation of ethnic minorities. The reason the situation is so shocking in football is that this is a game which – from the Premiership to the amateur leagues – palpably involves a huge number of black players. The natural progression is from player to manager, and yet this route is blocked for black players. And the cause of this is nothing to do with potential or ability, but a belief that black players may perform well on the pitch but are not suitable to lead and manage. These are stereotypes that are manifest throughout society, as evidenced by the paucity of black people in positions of authority. This is why there is little adverse comment about the state of football: in a white-dominated society this remains the norm and, consequently, it is barely noticed and rarely commented on in football.
There should be zero tolerance of the outrageous double standards which prevail in football: that black players are acceptable but black managers are not, that the virtual absence of black presenters or pundits from the studios, or of black representatives from the corridors of the FA, is somehow fine. A concerted effort by leading figures in football, the media, MPs and football fans could shift attitudes and help to make soccer a model for other sports, and even for society more widely. That might sound a tall order, but the blinding contradiction between the visibility of black players and the invisibility of black managers – and the blatant injustice of this state of affairs – suggest that it should not be impossible for football to set an example that others might copy.
This, however, will require the likes of
Alex Ferguson and Arsène Wenger to speak out and for others to follow. It cannot be left to the Kick it Out anti-racist pressure group, Barnes, Ince and a handful of others. White society must take responsibility for a situation that is
of its own making. l
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

6 comments
Although disproportionate the number of black executives at football's top level may be, your examples of
management discrimination are laughable. John Barnes may well have found it hard to get another job after his tenure at Celtic but this is far more likely to be down to how disasterous a job he did. As for Paul Ince, why should he have been given a higher first club than Macclesfield? The vast majority of managers start at lowly clubs, where they have to prove their skills - Martin O'Neill (Wycombe Wanderer) , David Moyes (Preston) - to name a couple. It's ridiculous to suggest that Ince was given the macclesfield job because of 'systematic discrimination' elsewhere in the league.
And your blinkered view of television coverage is also distressing. What about Manish Bahsin as a non-white
presenter? And as for the allegation that the black presence in football studios being token ( you only name Robbie Earle & Ian Wright - whose a figure of fun because he contributes nothing serious to the
discussion), how about Les Ferdinand, Garth Crooks, Marcel Desailly, Dion Dublin, Carlton Palmer - all regular contributors to football programs who you chose to omit from your limited pool.
Having read your opinions about football before in the Guardian, none of the above surprises me. Yes, football has issues with race, as it does with homosexuality, but I don't see how presenting a myopic,unbalanced article about the situation helps move the issues forward.
So what is your suggestion? Positive discrimination? "Affirmative action" as they call it in America? "Affirmative action" was of course the catalyst of the current recession, when Bill Clinton forced through Fair Lending Acts to force lenders to give out a quota of mortgages to ethnic minorities, even if they did not have the ability to pay it back. Hey presto, they don't pay it back, and the foundations laid down by neo-liberalism come crashing down. In summation, affirmative action is nonsense, as you point out with the 'tokenism' argument.
The problem is not just endemic of the upper echelons of football, but in the lower levels of the playing side too. In fact in all of society. You are basically preaching for people to not be consciously, or even unconsciously racist. Given that many people are consciously racist, and as Malcolm Gladwell in 'Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking' points out, if you take the Harvard IAT Race Test, 80% of consciously unracist people are unconsciously racist, the only way to get around your problem would be if we could wipe out everyones memories and supplant ethnic minorities to the same economic level as white British people.
Perhaps one of the reasons black managers rarely succeed in British football (Paul Ince, Leroy Rosenoir, John Barnes) is because of this endemic unconscious racism amongst players and impatient chairmen. But it is almost impossible to change your unconscious thoughts, so the problem becomes irrelevant.
So unless you would like to rip up hundreds of years of history and start again, I suggest you worry about things we can change. The likes of Alex Ferguson and Arsene Wenger cannot make people unconsciously unracist.
Who says "black managers are unacceptable"?
The truth is that, despite a long history of racism in football, a significant number of black players finally came to the fore in the 80s and 90s. It is only in recent years that these players have hung up their boots and even considered a career in punditry or management.
There is a debate to be had (and questions to be asked) here - but I doubt that a piece as strident and inaccurate as this is going to help.
Racism is a problem in our society and indeed in football, the ethnic penalty is a serious barrier to a fairer society. However this article seems to be based on a few blind assumptions. The fact that you state "There can be only one explanation: systematic discrimination by those in the boardrooms against applicants of darker skin." Means that you maybe overlook other factors that weigh in alongside racism that distort the ethnic makeup of football boardrooms. Class is one of those. Unfortunately ethnic minorites feature a disproportionate amount in lower economic classes and we know that if you are from a poorer background you are disadvantaged in being able to access elite positions in society, therefore if more than a proportionate (to white numbers) amount of ethnic minorites feature in that bracket then there will be a lower intake of that grouping in boardrooms because of class. Of course this doesnt mean that there isnt discrimination on ethnic grounds that help compound under representation but it means that class background is the main reason, not race. Hopefully in the future our society will become more equal in opportunites and with time the ethnic makeup of elite positions will become more proportionate becuase more ethnic minorites will be moving up the social ladder.
Furthermore Ian Wright is a figure of fun, I dont think his race has anything to do with his marginalisation, its just that he is not a serious commentator.
And finally this; "The natural progression is from player to manager."
What a load of tosh, not every player can be a manager and since there are over a thousand of league players and only 80/90 managerial jobs, few, only the most promising people progress to manger after playing.
Not a particularly balanced approach shown here. Bit like Mr Howe's angle taken through the years.
Ian Wright is treated like a figure of fun because he acts like a clown; somewhat like the stereotype I expect the author is uncomfortable with. He makes it sounds all so straightforward - 'systematic discrimination', so hard to argue against but so easy to excuse others of. It would never do to ever consider the possibility of Barnes and Ince as poor managers then...it has to be 'racism' , a choke around any intelligent left-wing thought it appears
is this a joke , i believe that in any job if your the right man for the job you will be hired, john barnes was a discgrace at celtic and made them a laughing stock but no one looked at him as a black manager just a bad 1 , im sick of people saying things like this , if a black manager is out there and hes a good a manager like fergie or wenger then im sure he will get a managers job