Registered user login:

Euro 2008 how to choose your team

Benedict Southworth

Published 06 June 2008

With no UK team in the Euro 2008 championship, how do you choose who to support? Well why not choose an ethical criteria? Wages, pollution, arms expenditure. It's your choice

If you are currently racking your brain for memories of distant relatives from Turkey, or Sweden or France or any other country actually still in the Euro 2008 championships, you can stop! The World Development Movement has created a handy website to aid your, probably highly arbitrary, choice of which team to support in each match.

www.whoshouldicheerfor.com ranks each team using criteria such as: spending on the military and healthcare; corruption; contribution to climate change; and income inequality. Overall Sweden ranks as the most ‘ethical’ team in the competition, and Russia comes in last.

The first match on Saturday is between the Czech Republic and Switzerland and there are number of ethical areas that you could use to determine where your allegiances might lie. If you have a soft spot for the underdog, you could go for the country whose population earns the least - the average person in the Czech Republic earns on average £8000 less than someone in Switzerland. But if you care about climate change you might place your support with the most climate friendly country. Here Switzerland wins hands down, with each person emitting almost half the amount of carbon as the average Czech person. And Switzerland also generates over half its electricity from renewable energy, whilst the Czech Republic only manages four per cent.

Worryingly had any of the UK teams, through some miracle, managed to qualify in the championship, ethically they would have ranked second to last. The UK is one of the richest countries in Europe but scores poorly in many areas: spending the most on the military in Western Europe; but only a meagre 0.36 per cent of GDP on aid; the UK also fails dismally on the percentage of electricity sourced from renewable energy - only Poland fares worse. And finally, the UK is one of the most unequal countries in Europe with the richest ten per cent of the population earning more than the poorest 14 per cent.

Clearly the comparisons are subject to caveats, but the trends are clear and powerful, not only for determining which football team you should support, but also for examining weighty, and otherwise rather dry issues in a more painless way – until your chosen team loses.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

6 comments from readers

Leedsnil
06 June 2008 at 12:59

ReL standfirst. I assume you mean an ethical criteriON

mbawn
06 June 2008 at 14:15

Also regarding inequality in earnings for England should read: richest 10% of population earning 14 times more thaan poorest 10%, as by definition the richest earn more than the poor.

Carl Jones
06 June 2008 at 16:27

It must be France....ahead of the pack by 30 years on C02 emissions. 35 hour working week, paying women to have children instead of importing baby machines, world leading inferstructure, excellent food and a public who doesn`t wear a ring through its nose...vive La France. {:¬D

knave
07 June 2008 at 07:17

On a football basis it has to Holland. Total football and they don't care. Also this have the best inter camp hatred.

France because a multiethnic side that winds up Le Pen and most British journalists .

Russia because Nick Cohen hates them.

Germany because they are not as bad as people say.

Carl Jones
07 June 2008 at 09:42

"Germany because they are not as bad as people say". You are right about the German people, but I thought Germany (the state) had ceased to be a nation and was now of an annex to Israel?

Henny
09 June 2008 at 22:04

Of course, football is already deeply enmeshed in politics but need we really exacerbate this by choosing who to vote for according to the politics of the particular nation-state? Why not let our vote be given to the team whose game appeals to us the most?

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?