Chile’s ghosts are not being rescued
The media swarmed as 33 copper miners were winched to safety from their underground prison in Copiap
By John Pilger Published 14 October 2010
The rescue of 33 miners in Chile is an extraordinary drama filled with pathos and heroism. It is also a media windfall for the Chilean government, whose every beneficence is recorded by a forest of cameras. One cannot fail to be impressed. However, like all great media events, it is a façade.
The accident that trapped the miners is not unusual in Chile, but the inevitable consequence of a ruthless economic system that has barely changed since the dictatorship of General Augusto Pinochet. Copper is Chile's gold, and the frequency of mining disasters keeps pace with prices and profits. There are, on average, 39 fatal accidents every year in Chile's privatised mines. The San José mine, where the men work, became so unsafe in 2007 that it had to be closed - but not for long. On 30 July last, a labour department report warned again of "serious safety deficiencies", but no action was taken. Six days later, the men were entombed.
For all the media circus at the rescue site, contemporary Chile is a country of the unspoken. At Villa Grimaldi, in the suburbs of the capital, Santiago, a sign says: "The forgotten past is full of memory." This was the torture centre where hundreds of people were murdered and disappeared for opposing the fascism that Pinochet and his business allies brought to Chile. Its ghostly presence is overseen by the beautiful Andes, and the man who unlocks the gate used to live nearby and remembers the screams.
Heirs of the dictator
I was taken there one wintry morning in 2006 by Sara de Witt, who was imprisoned as a student activist and now lives in London. She was electrocuted and beaten, yet survived. Later, we drove to the home of Salvador Allende, the great democrat and reformer who perished when Pinochet seized power on 11 September 1973 - Latin America's own 9/11. His house is a silent white building without a sign or a plaque.
Everywhere, it seems, Allende's name has been eliminated. Only on the lone memorial in the cemetery are the words engraved, "Presidente de la República", as part of a remembrance of the "ejecutados políticos": those "executed for political reasons". Allende died by his own hand as Pinochet bombed the presidential palace with British planes and the US ambassador watched.
Chile is now a democracy, though many would dispute that. In 1990, Pinochet bequeathed a constitutionally compromised system as a condition of his retirement and the military's withdrawal to the political shadows. This ensures that the alliance of broadly reformist parties, known as the Concertación, is permanently divided or drawn into legitimising the economic designs of the dictator's heirs. At the last election, the right-wing Coalition for Change, the creation of Pinochet's ideologue Jaime Guzmán, took power under President Sebastián Piñera. The bloody extinction of true democracy that began with Allende's death was, by stealth, made complete.
Piñera is a billionaire who controls a slice of the mining, energy and retail industries. He made his fortune in the aftermath of Pinochet's coup and during the free-market "experiments" of the zealots from the University of Chicago, known as the Chicago Boys. His brother and former business partner, José Piñera, a labour minister under Pinochet, privatised mining and state pensions and all but destroyed the trade unions. This was applauded in Washington as an "economic miracle", a model of the new cult of neoliberalism that would sweep the continent and ensure control from the north.
Today, Chile is critical to President Barack Obama's rollback of the independent democracies in Ecuador, Bolivia and Venezuela. Piñera's closest ally is Washington's main man, Juan Manuel Santos, the new president of Colombia, home to seven US bases and an infamous human rights record familiar to Chileans who suffered under Pinochet's terror.
Living in the shadows
Post-Pinochet Chile has kept its own enduring abuses in the shadows. Families still attempting to recover from the torture or disappearance of a loved one bear the prejudice of the state and employers. Those not silent are the Mapuche people, the only indigenous nation the Spanish conquistadors could not defeat. In the late 19th century, the European settlers of independent Chile waged a racist war of extermination against the Mapuche, who were left as impoverished outsiders. During Allende's thousand days in power, some Mapuche lands were returned and a debt of justice was recognised.
Since then, a vicious and largely unreported war has been waged against the Mapuche. Forestry corporations have been allowed to take their land, and their resistance has been met with murders, disappearances and arbitrary prosecutions under "anti-terrorism" laws enacted by the dictatorship.
In their campaigns of civil disobedience, none of the Mapuche has harmed anyone. The mere accusation of a landowner or businessman that the Mapuche "might" trespass on their own ancestral lands is often enough for the police to charge them with offences that lead to Kafkaesque trials, with faceless witnesses and prison sentences of up to 20 years. They are, in effect, political prisoners.
As the world rejoices at the spectacle of the miners' rescue, 38 Mapuche hunger strikers have not been news. They are demanding an end to the Pinochet laws used against them, such as "terrorist arson", and the justice of a real democracy. On 9 October, all but one of the hunger strikers ended their protest after 90 days without food. A young man, Luis Marileo, says he will go on. On 18 October, President Piñera is due to give a lecture on "current events" at the London School of Economics. He should be reminded of their ordeal and why.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


103 comments
Zole: Thank you but no. I´m 75 years old and too tired of people like Hans Castrop (Claptrap would be more fitting) and the wordy Mr Phil Duvalle to engage in this type of useless chatter. Like Noam Chomsky and John Pliger, I believe there exists a minority of very rich people, most of them resident in North America and Europe, whose main objective is to ensure that such wealth is not shared with anyone else. A
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colombian_parapolitics_scandal
Ask ANY Colombian whether they think the paramilitaries have huge government links. I would stake my life on them agreeing with what I've said above.
"In what possible way is Pinochet's coup comparable to the mass murder of 3,000 civilians?"
I think you will find that there were more than 3000 civilians both murdered and disappeared under Pinochet Hans. But they were "unworthy victims" so they dont really count in your eyes.
Thanks for your post Daniele.
"there are lots of brilliant leftist writers who give us the real context we need,"
Hans, et al: you are not "we." Why ever do NewStatesman readers need dinsinformation shills to pronounce who or who is not a brilliant leftist?
Gwyn Williams 1, Hans Castorp 0.
Zole. Sorry, I hit the wrong button. To do so, the rich and powerful plutonomies (Chomskie´s word for US, Canada and UK) need client (sensible middle class) governments, wide control of the mass media, institutions like the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and it´s regional branches, unrestricted access to the raw materials and cheap labour of the so called third world, and the power to impose their will by destabilising and overthrowing any government (Guatemala, Chile, etc.) or regional movement (Arab nationalism) that offers resistance. They don´t even have to win wars, instability is sufficient, i.e, Vietnam/Cambodia, the Contra in Nicaragua, Iraq/Afghanistan and the use of Israel in the Middle East, etc. On their list now will be Chaves in Venezuela, Corea in El Ecuador, Evo Morales in Bolivia. Some claim above that Chile had 20 years of socialist governments after Pinochet, but not one of them challenged Milton Friedman¨s neo liberal model imposed by the Junta. One could go on but to what purpose. As long as I´m not reminded of Blair or forced to listen to Hilary Clinton, I can avoid vomiting. Keep up the good work.
@ Lox
''I guess the nub of our differences lies in the phrase "petty self-interest". For me, there's nothing petty about it: it's a universal drive for self improvement - whether material or spiritual - that ultimately benefits everyone.''
Yep, you're right. And specifically it's in that last clause that we disagree. Isn't that the idea which justified neo-liberalism?
Please consider this article I was reading today:
http://leftfocus.blogspot.com/2010/04/wage-productivity-gap-caused-crisi...
Another part of history overlooked by most western media`s ... keep it up John. And for all you folk who don`t believe, try looking beyond Murdoch`s media empire ...
Arthur O'Connor, you should perhaps take a look at the performance of the UN's "Human Rights Council" -- which is controlled not by the West but by an Islamic and Afro-Asian bloc backed by Russia, China and Cuba and which ensures that absolutely nothing is done about even mildly criticising gross human rights violations anywhere except Israel. Whatever dear old John Pilger has to say about Chile (he fails to mention that for nearly two decades until this year it has been under the rule of centre-left parties including Allende's Socialists), any abuses there pale in comparison with the rapine, pillage, murder and just mayhem wreaked by so many governments in the so-called "non-aligned" world on their own populations. These, of course, have no interest for JP. I hope they do for you.