007 Bolivian socialist?
The plot of the Quantum of Solace makes reference to a real struggle carried out by the social movem
By Emma Felber Published 14 November 2008
A rusty pipe hangs from an improvised water tower, and drips miserably into the desert air. A crowd of simple-looking people in traditional Andean clothes, their dark faces furrowed with worry, surround it with empty buckets and containers, waiting for the water to come gushing out, but the pipe has run dry. They turn away in dismayed resignation.
This is one of the silent set-pieces in the new Bond film Quantum of Solace, set in Bolivia, which takes as its inspiration the struggle to control water and other natural resources in the developing world. Bond is on a mission to stop a faux-environmentalist billionaire from secretly appropriating all of Bolivia’s water supply by replacing its left of centre president with a handpicked despot, in a coup which the USA blithely ignores.
As in most Bond films, the ‘Bolivian’ extras (no footage was shot in Bolivia) provide a voiceless, picturesque background against which the heroics can be played out. The plot of the film makes reference to a real struggle carried out by the social movements of Bolivia to resist privatisation of water supplies, and while it is broadly sympathetic, it is also based on a central conceit: that the Bolivian people need the intervention of a suit-clad British action hero to save them from grasping transnationals and corrupt governments.
However, recent history in Bolivia contradicts this: the long struggle to reclaim sovereign control over natural resources has been fought by everyday women and men, through direct action and democratic participation, and control has been won with nary a high-octane plane chase in sight.
One can’t help imagining an alternate version of the scene described above, which would more closely reflect the Bolivian reality. The conversations happening underneath the plaintive music might go as follows. ‘Compañeros’, an old lady might shout, ‘the transnational has taken our water! Something must be done!’ More voices rise in protest, ‘A march on the capital! We should blockade the road! Demand a meeting with the President! This cannot continue!’
In this astonishingly politically active country, this would be a standard response, not muted resignation. Grassroots-led protests stopped the privatisation of water in Cochabamba in 2000, marking a significant point on the journey to power of current President, Evo Morales. Under his watch, the Bolivian constitution has been rewritten to include access to water as a basic human right, and this stands to be passed into law in January 2009.
As for attempts to topple his government and install a business-sympathetic autocrat, this would meet with short shrift in today’s South America, even if the depiction of the US authorities covertly supporting the coup skates uncomfortably close to reality.
After a wave of violence in September which various international bodies recognised as an attempted coup d’etat, the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) threw their weight behind Morales in a resounding declaration of solidarity.
They recognised that he was recently affirmed in his post by 67 per cent of the popular vote, and stated that any attempt to destabilise or overthrow his government was anti-democratic and would not be tolerated.
When the villains in Quantum of Solace affirm ‘we have twenty neighbouring governments ready to recognise the incoming administration as legitimate’, it rings false.
Not only has the Morales government secured natural resources for the benefit of the Bolivian people, but it has also cultivated a strong base of regional support which provides a counterweight to interventionism from the USA or elsewhere.
Isolated left-wing governments falling prey to US-backed coups only to be replaced with bloody dictatorships? Too bad the updated Bond didn’t take into account the political changes in Latin America: like his martinis and speedboat chases, the plot of Quantum of Solace all looks a bit dated.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


12 comments
The international council of HRF does rather tell the story
http://www.thehrf.org/internationalcouncil.html
And their unwillingness to name their funders is also fairly interesting.
I became more partisan by living in Bolivia.I was a labour voting liberal when I went there, but nothing further left than that.
I accept there is a militant left affiliated to the MAS which rarely surfaces in the lowland East, where I was and I understand it has a stronger presence on the altiplano, most famously in El Alto.
This extremist faction which is a militant reaction to the abuses they and their people have suffered for centuries etc, etc,(abuses the Bolivian opposition appear to exist primarily to continue) are not in government at cabinet level.Unless, of course, you pick Alvaro Garcia Linera, probably the most militant member of Morales' cabinet but someone who happens to be a highly educated white middle class intellectual.
The leftwing extremists are scattered through the pressure groups.Whilst the MAS government was elected on the shoulders of these pressure groups as it's core vote, events have shown they do not control it and Morales, due to his elected authority, has on many occasions used his position to tell them to calm down and, literally, to hold fire.
I've had experiences where indigenous people have given me or my partner crap (she's a lightish-skinned girl from the valleys), but I just tell them to stop being stupid because I'm not a rightwinger.I used to tell them 'stop acting like the camba'.That always made them blush with shame.
I don't doubt in La Paz there is more of an attitude against gringos and I don't blame you.I would tell them to fuck off as well.
What I saw in Bolivia is crystal clear in my mind.Systematic and expert attempts to undermine a 'hostile' democracy.If you've read some 20thc latin american history - which I only actually began to do after I'd formed my opinions on the matter purely from first hand experience - then it becomes truly sinister.
Your post seems naive.
Isn't it convenient that after the Morales govt has been given a clean sheet by all reputable electoral and human rights orgs, these guys appear.
http://www.counterpunch.org/burbach11182008.html
There you go, son.There's another more detailed account of US coup mongering in Bolivia.Feel free to chase up any of the points made within it.
How can you live in Bolivia and turn a blind eye to this?I couldn't live with myself if I was like you.
As an Aymara woman in Bolivia, 1st, I concur with stibbsy that the MAS led government is about "60% a very good thing", and I note I was part of that 67% who approved our Brother President's administration to continue and deepen the changes. 2nd, I also attest to the fact that although I am educated or mis-educated in various universities throughout Europe and the USA, I often get little or no attentiveness from city people in any of the 9 Departments in Bolivia when I am on my own or with my own, however- when accompanied by "gringos" or yellowed-hair siblings, whether they be friends, acquiantances or even newly arrived tourists, it seems my city-bretheren topple over themselves to be nice to me and mostly "my group". I realize this internalized racism will take years to change but I am willing to walk the path beside my government, unfettered by what those "opinionologists" of the Miami Herald or the questionable foundations might advance. After all, la Pachamama allows everyone to walk on her, not asking merits but rather providing her generosity.
If only you knew what was really going on in Bolivia! For
a peek look at the Human Rights Foundation:
http://www.thehrf.org/media/100808.html
I have been following events in Bolivia from early September, using Google alerts from around the world. The hrf site indicates, in its own way, a "central conceit" that seems to be as unrealistic and, dare I say, simplistic as the one in the movie reviewed above.
I'm glad PPBB is concerned.So am I.
Since Morales came to power, the Santa Cruz opposition have - as i witnessed first hand when I lived there and when not one single anglophone press outlet cared to report it, the following occurrences:bomb planting outside TVB, the state broadcaster in the city by a youth in a flak jacket.He was later let off without questioning by the local authorities - not the Federal ones, note; the TV broadcast on the morning of a perfectly legal pro government demonstration in the south of the city by peasants and lefties by the leading junta of the unelected Comite Civico Pro Santa Cruz - we all know who they are by now, I'm sure - who claimed the 'traitors' to Santa Cruz ran the risk of 'provoking' violence against them if they met.An indigenous woman later appeared on the TVB breakfast show and told the audience in quechua not to meet.She held her hand over her own mouth to signify what I assume was aquiescence.I took it to mean the govt in La Paz had told her to tell the govt supporters in the east to avoid confrontation.Fancy deciding to hold a legal public meeting.I can see why Morales and his people are a danger to the civilised whites.
Is this what you mean, PPBB?Are you the only socialist down the yacht club, then?
I know people who had their heads smashed in - in excess of 70 stitches, in fact - for 'looking like the President', ie being a wog.Fancy abusing the human rights of the affluent white boys by parading their brown skin in a taunting fashion.
Yes, I can see your point.
I had a family friend who worked as a low level civil servant in an agricultural dept have his office burst into by what the LA Times recently called, and I quote, 'freedom fighters' and who, once they had pushed the women out of the way who had dived to his protection, held him by the throat, whips and bats in their hands, and forced him, terrified for his life, to denounce the govt and Evo Morales.
Please qualify your earlier post.
Sorry, I forgot to mention: the attempted military coup; the assassination plots (which according to long serving and senior Bolvian military officers loyal to Morales originated in Langley, VA); the petrol bombs thrown at Cuban medics treating hitherto too-poor-to-treat Bolivians in the barrios; the staggeringly well coordinated barrage of lies and misinformation poured into the ears of the Cruceño populace, almost as if it was a propaganda exercise carried out by people with prior experience.....hmm...; the massacre of 18 peasants on their way to one of those pesky aforementioned MAS rallies.I went to a few.I wasn't threatened or singled out as a gringo spy.I found the people there to be very civilised, in fact.Quite the opposite of the image of an idelogically whipped up ignorant peasant class á la Cambodia that you, the White House, and indeed the local whites seem to be trying to portray.
Is it possible the right could have set up a Human Rights Foundation to try to redress the balance against those bastard liberals who keep banging on about, err, human rights and other such unprofitable bollocks?
Or are they impartial?
Feel free to reply.Becasue I still may feel, as you pointed out, that I don't really know what's going on in Bolivia.
The moral of the story is abudently clear. If you want to live in peace, if you want the poor of your country to share the benefits of the country's wealth then keep America light years away from your shores, they have nothing but mischief and misery to offer.
Thanks, Emma from Brisbane, Australia for your informative
article about the latest James Bond movie. I have enjoyed
most of these movies throughout the years in spite of the
obvious ideological difficulties.
Knowing that this movie addressed geo-political themes as it
did provided additional motivation to see it.
It seems to me that the local Murdoch-owned newspaper the
Courier Mail did not treat "Quantum of Solace" fairly and I
wrote about it at http://candobetter.org/node/945