Registered user login:

Victory for Morales

Carl Packman

Published 11 August 2008

Bolivia's socialist president, Evo Morales, wins a recall referendum reports Carl Packman plus Hugh O'Shaughnessy gives us his analysis of the importance of the victory

A concerted effort to destabilise the government of Bolivia's socialist president Evo Morales looks to have failed after the indigenous leader took on opponents in recall referendum.

In June, after the departments of Beni and Pando backed greater regional autonomy in illegal votes Morales told his supporters 'I am not afraid of the people, that they tell the truth and judge us'.

Now, according to exit polls, the people of Bolivia have resoundingly told Morales he should go ahead with new socialist initiatives despite the opposition of some department governors.

The referendum, in which 4,090,711 Bolivians were predicted to vote, was being overseen by 200 foreign observers and 4,000 Bolivian observers.

In the run-up to Sunday's vote Cristina Kirchner, President of Argentina, and Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, cancelled their visits to Bolivia after masked protesters stormed the airport where they due to land.

Morales himself was forced to limit his campaign travel, especially in the areas described as the "Half-Moon" departments (Beni, Pando, Santa Cruz, Tarija) where popular anti-Morales sentiment is rife. He also broke with tradition and spent Bolivia's national day in his political heartland of Le Paz rather than the constitutional capital of Sucre - a place in which his political allies ahve been targeted.

In the capital of the Chuquisaca department, where an oppositional candidate won the election for prefect, the former Morales' Movement Towards Socialism (MAS) prefect took refuge in Peru.

A secure victory for Morales meant a repeat of his victory in the presidential race three years ago which was always quite likely, as suggested in his 59 per cent national popularity in a recent poll.

Since his win in 2005 Morales has begun to bring about change in South America's poorest country.

Six out of ten Bolivians belonging to the indigenous population. Six out of ten of the population live in squalid conditions. "Past governments focused more on businessmen so that they could generate wealth and distribute it," says Emilio Pinto Marin, a minister in the budget department, "but it didn't happen, we've been waiting for 25 years for this to happen, and it never did."

Many of the Bolivia's majority population regard Morales, himself indigenous, and the first native person to become president of Bolivia, as a hero who has been the first head of state to recognise their struggle.

Waldo, a driver who gives tours through the altiplano and Bolivia's famous salt plains, pointed out the benefits of Morales' redistribution policies when recognising small villages.

Many once only had three or four hours of electricity. But, thanks to Morales' initiatives, now have up to eight hours of light due to solar panelling. Morales' future plans are to introduce 24 hours of energy a day in these once forgotten places, and also to pave their mountainous roads with concrete.

To coincide with Morales' plans, Venezuela, with help from commercial ties with Iran, are to loan Bolivia the 225 million dollars needed to establish a state cement company. As it stands an opponent of Evo Morales' governance Samuel Doria Medina controls all cement production through private companies.

In other parts of the economic sector, revenues of natural gas and precious metals have increased since Morales nationalised the country's gas fields in 2006. Bolivia now keeps 85 per cent of its national gas profits, and with the rising energy prices have doubled profits since 2005.

Evo Morales, now having secured a success in the referendum will be exploring how best to act on his victory.

Because some of the other winners in this vote have included political opponents in regional governships, Bolivia will continue to remain politically tense.

But Morales has done well enough to try to push through some delayed socialist plans.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

10 comments from readers

lutkica
11 August 2008 at 16:20

wonderful!!!! bolivia is on the right way. all my best wishes to evo morales. this is one of the greatest day.

Riaz Ahmad
11 August 2008 at 19:15

He is doing what every govenment worth its salt should be doing, helping the poor to get out of poverty through equitable distribution of country's wealth. In South America, USA always made sure, neither such policies nor such leaders survive. The brave and incorruptable Chevez set the trend and started this magnificient revolution, it has brought benefit to millions of poor, something the USA is not quite happy with.

pugnax
12 August 2008 at 05:16

VIVA Evo!

beatriz.
12 August 2008 at 17:00

This article is a brilliant account of a brilliant day.

Well done Packman.

Viva Evo!!!

antileft
13 August 2008 at 09:01

Oh what a load of tosh. This article is just written for the benefit of the "yes men" above who are just looking for a way to confirm their prejudice and feel good about it. When are the far-lefties here going to learn- that kind of statist hard left socialism DOES NOT WORK. How many countries have to try it and fail before you people give up on it and move on? Honestly, it's always the same. A big fist waving hero takes over "for the people". He starts nationalising things and making it harder for business. Institutions are politicised. The rich start leaving, and companies start getting taken over or going bankrupt. Companies are politicised. Less and less is produced. The government is forced to print more and more money because it can no longer feed all those mouths that are now on its payrole. Inflation picks up. From here, suddenly things stop looking as good and either the revolution is stopped in one way or another, or the dictatorship is predictably cemented and the people realise theyve been duped into a dumb personality cult with no way out. And all those armchair western lefties who were cheering before, like the losers above? Well, one things for sure! They aint moving to the new utopia!

antileft
13 August 2008 at 09:18

"To coincide with Morales' plans, Venezuela, with help from commercial ties with Iran, are to loan Bolivia the 225 million dollars needed to establish a state cement company. As it stands an opponent of Evo Morales' governance Samuel Doria Medina controls all cement production through private companies."

Yes, and we cant have someone who didnt vote for the president in charge of a large company, can we?! EVERYONE important has to vote the same, and think the same. And cement?! How can a private company possibly produce something as complicated as cement as efficiently as a morales-supporting, revolutionary arm of the state? Obviously, once youve got rid of all the people who dont support morales, and once youve "re-educated" the rest by teaching them about socialism, theyll produce more, wont they? Yes, and much better that Iran and Venezuela own the cement factories in bolivia than a nasty rich little bolivian.

CharlieX
14 August 2008 at 14:03

This is very good news!

If there's one place where some redistribution of wealth is needed, then it's Bolivia.

Neither State Socialism nor Individualist Capitalism is the answer, however.

The theory of 'Trickle down' was shown to be a total and utter farce!

and of course, Total nationalisation and total privatisation are equally bad for a country's economy.

I think a massive windfall tax may have been better- re: The energy businesses being nationalisted, Sudden changes of ownership are often problematic for industries.

However I'm not sure whether Privatisation automatically means more investment (I believe this to be a myth) but overall, I think it makes sense that Morales rather than the Stock exchanges in the US receive the profits from the Gas companies.

Infrastructure (nearly always ignored by Free market capitalists) comprising transport, lighting and education is essential to the economy in Bolivia and Morales will be able to get this importatn part of the economy moving and isn't it great that though solar panelling, many people now have 8 hours of light in the day!

Overall it's the right result for Bolivia. but.I hope he keeps inflation under control..

Trickster
02 September 2008 at 01:11

Since Evo nationalised the oil & gas industry, we have no gas, no diesel and no gasoline. How is this progress? A death on my watch, I'll resign, over 80 and counting, not resignation. Gas is for the Bolivians, no gas for Bolivians, but over half of Brasils gas comes from here. A normal cheating lying politician, just like all his predecessors. Plus giving more power or rights to a part of the population because of their race was calle apartheid in RSA, why now is it acceptable? Don't support this man, who is ruining this country!

Trickster
02 September 2008 at 01:17

Don't think that because the right leaning politicians failed, Evo will succeed. He is doing more damage then most people realise, this country will quickly deteriorate! Look at his campaign promises and see which ones he has fulfilled, NONE. Thousands of disabled people still await the promised funding he was to give them, now he spends it on political campaigns. This man is a fraud and if he pushes his constitution forward illegally like he has promised, the country will end up in civil war, with the eventual result a poorer old Bolivia to the West and a richer new Bolivia to the East. Where will Evo be then, the president of the 'even more' poorest country in South America, and you people see this as progress.

verovi62@yahoo.com
09 September 2008 at 20:42

In the capital of the Chuquisaca department, where an oppositional candidate won the election for prefect, the former Morales' Movement Towards Socialism (MAS) prefect took refuge in Peru.

Why is he refuge? because "he knows to much" and the MAS people was follow him to keep he in silence. He knows how was the governement repression organized against the people.

Evo was necesary to put on the table many issues. But now he is concentrated the power, he is the repressor, he is not acepting diferences, he is not listening the diferent voices. He is not indigenous he is a mestizo as many of latin americans. The MAS movemente is a colonialist movement representing only the aimara people going towar others many diferente indigenous groups in the lowlands of Bolivia.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Also by Carl Packman

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?