Five to a room
A poignant series of images exposes the reality of what it is like to be a poor child living in Brit
By Edward Platt Published 27 February 2012

Shadow of success: this boy's mother can't afford to buy him a ticket to the Celtic Park stadium in Glasgow. One in every five children in Scotland lives in poverty

Garnlydan, Ebbw Vale. One in three Welsh children lives in poverty. Ebbw Vale is the poorest county in Wales

Ashleigh, 19, lives with her parents and younger sister outside Glasgow, along with Ashleigh's toddlers Shaun, two, and Ayesha, one. "I find it difficult to buy things for the children," she says

Christine, Nicola and Stacey, aged 13 to 16, live on a Wolverhampton estate. There's no money for a table or chairs, so the girls do their homework on the bed or the floor. They are determined to succeed -- but children in poverty are half as likely to get five good GCSEs


Christine, Nicola and Stacey's parents' house in Wolverhampton is run-down but the children have a few treasured possessions

Mahmoud, Saamia, Ahlaam and Nasri live in a one-bedroomed flat in Birmingham. Mahmoud sleeps in the cot, the baby in a sleeping basket and the girls share a bed with their mother, Amal. Their father sleeps on the sofa in the living room
Photographs by Liz Hingley, Laura Pannack and Simon Roberts
Three related statistics illustrate the grotesque extremes of the times in which we live. In 2009 - a year in which British banks were beneficiaries of unprecedented largesse in the form of quantitative easing - Barclays paid the Treasury £113m in corporation tax and in 2010 it rewarded its bankers with bonuses of £3.5bn. If that does not constitute a sufficient abuse of business propriety and common sense, then consider a protest group's claim that the "rewards for success" Barclays paid its bankers in a single year were more than has been spent on education in the Borough of Tower Hamlets, east London, where the bank happens to have its headquarters, so far this century.
Such flagrant disparities exist within a city that claims to be the sixth-wealthiest in the world. Besides Barclays, London hosts the headquarters of more than 100 of Europe's largest companies, and its economy of £162bn accounts for nearly 20 per cent of the UK's total GDP. Yet four in every ten children in London live in poverty and the figure rises to above one in two in its inner boroughs.
London has a higher proportion of children living in income poverty than any region or country in Great Britain. However, there is
little reason for complacency elsewhere. One in three children in Wales lives in poverty, one in four in the south-west of England, and one in five in Scotland.
Breadlines
These measures represent stark deprivation. The average household income in London is £44 per person per day, but a family living in poverty has £10 per person per day to buy everything it needs, from clothing to food.
The photographs published here, from Save the Children's campaign on poverty in the UK, illustrate the pinched and provisional nature of life on such a budget. Four children huddle in a single cot in a flat in Birmingham; three teenage girls read and do their homework on the bed because there is no table in their parents' house; a boy plays with a football in the shadow of a Glasgow stadium that offers the tantalising prospect of riches and success.
The effects are felt well beyond the domestic sphere - Save the Children's campaign asserts, self-evidently, that children living in poverty are more likely to live in unsafe neighbourhoods - and they resonate through the generations. Education is supposed to provide an escape route, and yet children in poverty are half as likely to get five good GCSEs as their better-off peers.
Worse still is to come because the public spending cuts that we have been promised are only just beginning. George Osborne has frozen child benefit and cut the child tax credit that he raised less than two years ago, and many more children will be forced into penury as a result. The coalition government has promised to end child poverty by 2020, but Save the Children predicts that the number of those living "below the breadline" will rise.
The age of austerity has begun, and the pain that is supposed to be shared by all will be felt most keenly by those who can afford it least. l
Save the Children commissioned Carol Allen-Storey, Liz Hingley, Laura Pannack, Simon Roberts and Abbie Trayler-Smith to create a series of images documenting how 3.5 million children live in poverty in Britain today. A selection of the photographers' work will go on display in the Upper Waiting Hall of the Palace of Westminster, London SW1, from 12-16 March
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


21 comments
The issue is Life Choices; when Ashleigh was doing the bizzo at 16 did she not realise what the consequences were likely to be.
Some disgusting comments on here from people like John Bull. Makes me lose faith in human nature.
Furthermore stereotypical judgements are being made without any background knowledge of these people's situations or how they become so poor.
Grow up!
Great campaign. I wish Save the Children the best of luck. I think photos are a very good way of getting the message over. Even if it doesn't work with disgusting human beings like John Ball.
The children are the innocent victims so blaming their parents achieves nothing. The Save the Children organisation is doing what it can in the face of such opposition and bigotry as that from John Bull. They WILL 'save' some of those children who are less fortunate than many but would be able to save more with more support in the form of money or volunteering.
PS I do not work for Save the Children but do support them and admire their tremendous efforts across the world.
Maybe JB could dissipate his anger and channel his agression by looking outwards beyond his small world and do something constructive to lower child poverty.
I can see that JB will never look beyond his small world and think about the children in all this so I will spend no more time on this. I feel sad that his outlook is so negative and narrow without one thought for the innocent victims... the children.
Any reason why you'd want to have more than one or two children if you're poor?
Any reason possible for having two children before you've reached the age of twenty?
Anybody? Or are you just supposed to be delighted with the opportunity to "show solidarity" and feed what someone else breeds?
Yeah good thinking JB - and how much do you think it costs to keep a child in a childrens' home or to have them fostered? It's easy to make express glib opinions on the internet but much more difficult to deal with the messy reality of peoples lives - don't think the average person was planning for the onset of the worst recession in, near, living memory before they lost their job, their relationship broke down and to add insult to injury they found themselves having to take the bigoted abuse of halfwits.
This kind of poverty is a disgrace in the UK (matched only by the ignorance of bigots like "john bull").
Sadly, child poverty levels are just as high in Canada, and climbing, as Conservative cuts bite there, too.
It's not always about 'Life Choices' and how these people came to be in this position. It's about what we can do NOW to help them and to stop their situation becoming worse. What are YOU going to do or are you going to leave it someone esle? Have some compassion please.
Maybe the poor have too many children? That's why there are more poor children than poor adults?
@ John Bull Address the issue. The issue is poverty - it isn't how someone hiding behind an alias feels about the matter. If the only the issue could be dealt with by issuing Kanga high security pants on supposed miscreants.
Who's interested your cowardly, prejudiced and simplistic conclusions other than you? John Bollocks!