Registered user login:

Israel's illegal outpost

Jonathan Cook

Published 25 September 2008

The extremist children of the settlements who have turned their backs on what they regard as their parents' caution to live in a twilight world of illegality

"It is not right to hide behind fences, to live in ghettoes. This land belongs to the Jewish people and we must claim it proudly and without fear," says 17-year-old Lital, enjoying the shade of an ancient olive tree in the West Bank with her teenage friends. In long flowing skirts, they gently strum guitars and play hand-carved flutes, a picture of back-to-nature wholesomeness.

In the type of violation of international law that the UN's Middle East envoy has urged the incoming Israeli prime minister Tzipi Livni to address, Lital lives deep in the West Bank next to the Palestinian city of Ramallah. But unlike most of Israel's half a million other settlers, she and her friends scorn the protection afforded Israel's official colonies: razor-wire fences, watchtowers and patrols of armed soldiers.

Their small camp - two buildings, one for boys, the other for girls - is made of tin sheeting, spare bits of plywood and thick cardboard. Lital belongs to a group known as the "hilltop youth", extremist children of the settlements who have turned their backs on what they regard as their parents' caution. Even by the standards of the settlers, theirs is a twilight world of illegality, which explains Lital's reluctance to provide a last name or allow her photograph to be taken.

The hilltop youth were the foot soldiers who fought police at road junctions across Israel to block the disengagement from Gaza. Increasingly they refuse to identify with the state or obey its laws. Their key battleground is safeguarding and expanding what Israelis refer to as the "illegal outposts", unauthorised extensions of the main settlements.

Today there are 150 official settlements, and nearly as many outposts dotted across the West Bank. Typically an outpost starts as a huddle of caravans high on a hilltop. A road is built to connect it to other settlements, and water, electricity and schools soon follow. In the past it has been only a matter of time before an "illegal outpost" becomes an established settlement.

But that changed after 2003, when the US initiated the Road Map, President Bush's plan to advance a Palestinian state. As part of the first stage Israel is expected to dismantle most of the outposts, a requirement it has failed so far to meet. Under increasing pressure from the Americans, however, the Israeli government finally promised this month to destroy Migron, the largest of the outposts and one it has admitted was built on private Palestinian land. That decision brought Lital and her friends, some as young as 12, to Migron's defence.

Located next to Ramallah, the West Bank's unofficial capital, Migron is considered to be of "strategic value" by Daniella Weiss, a former mayor of the religious settlement of Kedumim, near Nablus, and leader of the most extreme wing of West Bank settlers. She points out that it offers a bird's-eye view of Route 60, the main Palestinian thoroughfare connecting Jerusalem with Jenin in the northern West Bank.

Despite its illegality, Migron has received at least $4m in subsidies from the Israeli government since its founding six years ago. It now consists of 45 Orthodox religious families, as well as parks, playgrounds, a kindergarten and a synagogue, in addition to the hilltop youth congregating on its fringes.

But rather than accept Migron's demise, the youngsters have been expanding it, building their new outpost outside its boundaries, further down the hillside and closer to the neighbouring Palestinian village of Mukhmas.

"In time," says Alex Ostrovsky, at 22 in effect the guardian of Migron's hilltop youth, "our outpost will become established too." He should know: he helped found Migron when he was 15.

Is he afraid to live outside the protection of Migron? "The Arabs are more afraid of us than we are of them," he says. "They don't dare cross the road that separates us."

Lital calls the inhabitants of Migron "weak". "They are not ready to fight," she adds. "This place belongs not just to the people of Migron but to the whole Jewish people. We must live everywhere in the Land of Israel."

Are her parents worried for her safety? "They live in a religious settlement and fully support me. All of the country started this way. Our parents came here with nothing from all over the world and built our nation. We are only following in their footsteps."

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

13 comments from readers

ExplodingBadger
26 September 2008 at 01:47

@byafet

Instead of throwing around insults why not address the issues he has written about.

By the way Israel only happens to be a democracy if you happen to be Jewish.

gnuneo
01 October 2008 at 03:50

i just find it amazing how this extraordinarily brutal land-grab and ethnic cleansing for the last 40 or so years is only NOW becoming opposed due to 'The Road Map'. How has it been that Israel has gotten away with it, why have our media not been flooded with images of this slow expansion of Israeli Lebenstraum and its victims?

platonicnumber
02 October 2008 at 13:48

A few questions:

-Which 'country' in the Middle East, has the most powerful best equipped military, with recruitment capabilities that would be the envy of any developed nation?

-Which 'country' in the Middle East, has had military conflicts with all its, and prevailed in all of them?

-Which 'country' in the Middle East (arguably in the world), has the best espionage and security apparatus?

-Which 'country' in the Middle East, is ranked amongst the top 10 nations worldwide in research and development?

-Which 'country' in the Middle East, is the 6th nuclear power in the world. attaining that status within 25 years of its inception-on land that had no infrastructure to support such a rapid development?

-Which 'country' in the Middle East, has an ongoing government settlement and home building programme for all its citizens, non-stop over the past 60 years?

-Which 'country' in the Middle East, has the highest rate of inward immigration?

-Which 'country' in the Middle East, is able to continuously flout UN resolutions, and count on the unconditional support of the world's most powerful nations; regardless?

And on and on.

-This is a 60 year old 'country' that has no natural resources to speak of.

-That is almost 50% desert.

-That has no economic relations with its neighbours.

-That is constanly at war.

-That has a captive, hostile population of several million souls.

And on and on.

Nothing about this so called 'country' addes up, and if we dare put all this in the context of the current economic and political woes, a more sinister picture emerges of this unsustainble colony; that the settelers would have us believe is actually a 'country'!

gnuneo
02 October 2008 at 17:31

platonicnumber: actually very recently emigration from Israel has exceeded immigration, as the non-fanatical Israelis are realising that the current Zionist policy is unsustainable, and will inevitably lead to permanent war - until Israel is destroyed.

the Jews who fled Europe from the European Holocaust, traumatised to the core by this event and attitude, have done naught else but create the conditions by which this will be repeated. As any psychologist/councillor will tell you, people who have been abused, and have not been healed, often go out and recreate the conditions of abuse. Daughters of abusive fathers often end up in relations with abusive partners, and so on, and so on.

If Israel had been founded on a spirit of sharing, of cross-culture compassion and generosity, of bringing the native Palestinians into the new settlements and companies, of raising their living standards and opening advanced education to them, not only would Israel not be at war and facing long-term eventual destruction, it would have been the spearhead of a modern, democratic and advanced regional rebirth.

instead it is racist, fanatical, bigoted - and doomed. (Although NOT by a possible Iranian nuclear strike, but by the very real prospect of global sanctions, leading to their oil-based military grounding to a halt, whilst facing millions of lightly armed irregulars.) If i were an Israeli, and i had 2 brain cells left to rub together, i'd be clearing out of there as well.

Amihai
04 October 2008 at 13:17

"By the way Israel only happens to be a democracy if you happen to be Jewish".

Really?

By law, all citizens, regardless of nationality, ethnicity, religion, sex, political or sexual orientation may elect and be elected to Israel's Knesset (parliament). And of course, Arab and Jew alike vote in the elections to parties which are general and open to all – left, right and center – or to those exclusive (by choice) Arab parties. The Knesset thus has had from day one Jewish as well as Arab members. In fact, one such member, Ahmad Tibi, is a deputy chairman of the house despite the fact that he does not even accept Israel's right to exist.

In addition, the government has had Arab members, presently Mr. Ghalib Majadla serves as the Education, Science and Sports Minister in Olmert's government.

The courts in Israel at all levels also include numerous Arab judges, including the highest court of the Land, Israel's Supreme Court.

One may find Arabs serving the Israel's Defence Forces at various levels, in Israel's police, and of course a very large and meaningful percentage of those serving in Israel's Border Police – MaGaV – are Arabs: Druze, Christians and Muslims.

To attempt to describe Israel as non-democratic while in reality it is a functioning liberal democracy is either done based on lack of knowledge or pure malice, and I strongly suspect that it is done based on both, while hoping that people who do know a thing or two about Israel will not find this accusation and will be willing and able to respond to it.

P.S. At least of Israel's Jewish population has originated from Arab and other Muslim countries. May I ask: In which one of those countries could a Jew be elected into a "parliament", serve as a minister in the government, serve on those countries courts and become high officer in the armed forces of those Arab and Muslim countries?!

gnuneo
04 October 2008 at 16:38

amihai: Muslim countries do not however claim to live up to Western notions of democracy and religious equality. Instead they live up to their Shariah obligations to minority Abrahamic religions, and many Jews have found extremely cushy positions within Muslim societies, in Parliament's, and Ministries.

it is Israel that has attempted to claim to being an "outpost of Western Civilisation", and so it is up to Israel to live up the Ideals of Secularism, inclusiveness, and non-racism. On all these counts, it has failed miserably. (and yes, so have most Western countries so far, but nowhere near to the same extent).

one addenda to my previous post: i do not yet regard the situation regarding Israel's survival as being impossible, they still have a small margin by which to transform their relations with their neighbours and safeguard the existence of worldwide Jewry, however that window of opportunity is fast disappearing.

less than 100yrs since the Europeans mass slaughtered Jews, the consequences of that Holocaust has now led to the brink of a repeat, with the Israelis being egged on to national self-destruction by the very same memes that created the European Holocaust.

it is extremely observable that the historic curve of Israel's existence, is almost completely mirroring the curve of Germany under the National Socialists. Can the Jews be better People than the Germans and pull back from the brink before it is too late, rediscover their Humanity, and ensure the survival of Israel through compassion, generosity and sharing? Will the Israeli leadership, facing the same Bunker situation as Hitler did, but armed with Nukes, start Armageddon as the Christian Fundamentalists desire them to do? Should those Israelis who are questioning the wisdom of Israel's current direction give up and emigrate to South America, or should they stay and try to bring Israel back from the brink?

not easy questions, and notably lacking in most MSM reportage.

Amihai
04 October 2008 at 17:54

"Muslim countries do not however claim to live up to Western notions of democracy and religious equality"

Thus the wide spread slavery in Muslim-Arab states, especially in the Gulf states; thus the use of child labour by those children who are not yet enslaved; thus the spouse abuse and murder; thus legally not permitting a Jew to reside, to own property and certainly to take part in the civil life of citizens in Muslim-Arab countries.

And some here still justify this, in a "progressive", "enlightened" publication….

What shall I say….?

Amihai
04 October 2008 at 19:27

The country which a poster up thread has attempted to demonize is actually the very proud nation-state of a very proud people, a nearly 4,000 year old people and civilization – Israel.

The modern state of Israel of course came about based on UN Resolutions and has been a member in good standing of the United Nations and all other relevant international and intergovernmental organizations. The UN incidentally voted back in 181 to allow for the establishment of Israel in the historic homeland of the Jewish people based on the universally accepted right of all peoples to national self-determination and independence. The UN at the time also voted to allow for an Arab independent state to be established in Eretz Israel/Palestine but the Arabs, as they had done in 1937 and many times since, rejected the offer and the opportunity to establish their own independent state and instead initiated a war the aim of which was to extinct the very life of the newly proclaimed state and to drive its Jewish residents into the sea, or at least slaughter them!

Well, Israel is a thriving liberal democracy to which people from all corners of the earth come to both settle as well as to learn how this miracle came about, despite all odds and despite the constant existential threat posed by the Muslim-Arab world. It is time we all salute Israel and the progress and developments it has brought about to the region of the Middle East and to the world as a whole, don't you think?

P.S. And as for the advancement of an accomodation of a peaceful co-existence between Arab and Jew, between Israel and its Arab neighbors, it is time to bring back the Jordanian Option for most of the West Bank and the Egyptian Option for the Gaza Strip, and both based on UN Security Council Resolution 242.

gnuneo
05 October 2008 at 22:22

amihai: i'd forgotten how fanatical and bigoted you are, thank you for reminding me.

""Muslim countries do not however claim to live up to Western notions of democracy and religious equality"

Thus the wide spread slavery in Muslim-Arab states, especially in the Gulf states; thus the use of child labour by those children who are not yet enslaved; thus the spouse abuse and murder; thus legally not permitting a Jew to reside, to own property and certainly to take part in the civil life of citizens in Muslim-Arab countries.

And some here still justify this, in a "progressive", "enlightened" publication….

What shall I say….?"

so according to you there has been NO Jews living in any Muslim land? No Jews have ever owned property in a Muslim Land? No Jew has ever taken part in the civil life of a Muslim Land?

you are seriously off your head.

"The modern state of Israel of course came about based on UN Resolutions and has been a member in good standing of the United Nations and all other relevant international and intergovernmental organizations."

ahh yes, and that would be why Israel has ignored Resolution after Resolution demanding she leave the Occupied Territories, why she has ignored International Law about the Right to Return for war-refugees, International Law preventing the occupation of Land taken in warfare? Or by "relevant" perhaps you mean AIPAC and the American Far Right, who incidentally were supporting Adolph Hitler just a few decades ago, who therefore support the concept of Lebensraum, or "Israeli annexation of empty land that happens to border it" as Israeli schoolbooks claim. Much like South Africa was "empty land" before the whites got there.

"The UN incidentally voted back in 181 to allow for the establishment of Israel in the historic homeland of the Jewish people based on the universally accepted right of all peoples to national self-determination and independence."

wow, i had NO idea the UN went back that far! Nor that ownership of something 2000yrs ago gives one the right to demand ownership today - seems rather far-fetched really, i guess one had to be there.

"The UN at the time also voted to allow for an Arab independent state to be established in Eretz Israel/Palestine but the Arabs, as they had done in 1937 and many times since, rejected the offer and the opportunity to establish their own independent state and instead initiated a war the aim of which was to extinct the very life of the newly proclaimed state and to drive its Jewish residents into the sea, or at least slaughter them! "

yes, that was a mistake, and has caused vast amounts of unnecessary suffering on both sides. It was however 3 generations ago, and it is lunatic to base one's current actions on actions taken so long ago, especially when your actions are not only destroying the entire region's capability to evolve and develop (or do you think the incursion into Lebanon will do wonders for peace & development?), but are also entirely unsustainable for Israel itself, and will lead inevitably to yet another Holocaust.

"Well, Israel is a thriving liberal democracy to which people from all corners of the earth come to both settle as well as to learn how this miracle came about, despite all odds and despite the constant existential threat posed by the Muslim-Arab world. It is time we all salute Israel and the progress and developments it has brought about to the region of the Middle East and to the world as a whole, don't you think?"

i have been to Israel, i worked on a Kibbutz one summer in my 20s, and i loved every minute of the experience, and also have tremendous respect for the Israelis (mainly Kibbutzniks) that i met, and yes, what they had built and achieved. At the time, i did not really know anything about the history beyond the light-weight MSM history that most Westerners are programmed with, and i did not grasp the historic roots of the conflict. All i have to say is - would that that development had been achieved with spirit of sharing and equality with the Palestinians whose land the Israeli's took over, would that the early settlers have opened up their new communities and businesses, colleges, schools and universities to the indigenous Palestinians who were held mainly in the feudal structure of the Ottomans and Egyptians and generally lacked access to such a modern route of self and community improvement, would that the Jews have returned not with the pain and horror of the Holocaust burdening them and inevitably tainting everything, but that they had returned with their arms full of that at which the Jews have always excelled - capital accumulation, high intellectual pursuits, and a love of this Earth and her Bountiful Land.

what a different world we would now live in.

"P.S. And as for the advancement of an accomodation of a peaceful co-existence between Arab and Jew, between Israel and its Arab neighbors, it is time to bring back the Jordanian Option for most of the West Bank and the Egyptian Option for the Gaza Strip, and both based on UN Security Council Resolution 242."

or we could go back to the Green Line, Israel negotiate as *an equal* with the legitimate Hamas/Fatah Govt for it to purchase the more settled illegal settlements, invest massively in Palestinian cooperatives to boost the Palestine economy instead of the current Bantustanisation that Israel has forced upon the area, and slowly aim to build common security for ALL (not just Israeli Jews), with the aim of an eventual integration of two, modern and advanced societies together into Palrael, or Israstine, however you want to call it.

or do you seriously imagine you can hide under the wing of the American Empire much longer, continue to oppress the natives with impunity and ignore International Law? Bush has been the death-stroke for the US economy, and what is left will soon be drained away by the bankers. Even if it wanted to (which frankly is doubtful), very soon the US will not be able to shelter Israel much longer with its military aid and direct military power, and how long do you think Israel can survive, when it is surrounded by 100s of millions of pissed off neighbours, with those very same neighbours holding the resource that keeps Israel's military moving?

the Muslim World is hopping mad about the invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq - who do you think the Western Elites are going to hold out as a scapegoat?

wake up fool, you are singing and dancing to the very cliff-edge.

sweety
06 October 2008 at 02:33

'The Road Map'. How has it been that Israel has gotten away with it, why have our media not been flooded with images of this slow expansion of Israeli Lebenstraum and its victims?

What about the right of return of Jews and Gentiles to Mecca and Medina?

Amihai
06 October 2008 at 08:18

"...why have our media not been flooded with images of this slow expansion of Israeli Lebenstraum and its victims?"

For a simple reason: This "slow expansion" is pure propaganda that has not been taking place, but for in the pages of certain "progressive" and "enlightened" publications that seem to cater to those eager to single out the nation-state of a particular people, a race, the Jewish state of Israel, and to obsessively, exclusively and without any proportionality demonize everything about it.

There is a name, incidentally, for this phenomenon, it is called racism, anti-Jewish racism in this case!

Cybertiger
06 October 2008 at 11:34

"What about the right of return of Jews and Gentiles to Mecca and Medina?"

What about it, sweety pie?

Amihai
06 October 2008 at 12:54

"What about the right of return of Jews and Gentiles to Mecca and Medina?"

Jews of course are permitted legally to even enter the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, let alone settle there, owning property there and participate in the kingdom's civil life. This anti-Jewish approach, by all criteria is consider racism, anti-Jewish racism.

Incidentally, Jews may also not reside and acquire property in places such as Jordan or even the Palestinian Authority. In both places selling land to Jews may bring with it, legally, death upon the seller.

I wish Mr. Cook and like minded addressed this issue and the issue of slavery that is so wide spread in many Arab countries, but I am not going to hold my breath to see such articles in certain publications.....!!!

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Also by Jonathan Cook

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?