Registered user login:

Unsanctioned penguins

Jonathan Calder

Published 18 August 2008

Stalinism is all the rage, as think tanks seek to relocate the population. Meanwhile, Telford's penguins fail to complete the correct paperwork

I have a scoop. A genuine scoop. Or something very close to it.

We Midlanders remained neutral on the Policy Exchange report that wanted everyone to abandon Northern England and move to Oxford or Cambridge (I paraphrase.) We just enjoyed the grief it caused the Conservative Party.

But it happens that I know the report’s lead author, Tim Leunig, and he is not a Tory at all. He is a Liberal Democrat. In the days when they still let me through the door at Lib Dem HQ he was something of a fixture on the party’s policy working groups.

The press largely failed to pick this up, and it took two days for anyone to brief David Cameron on the subject. Like the rest of us, his backroom staff assumed he did want to close the region down. Some thought he wanted to sell off the population for medical experiment too.

This will be a disappointment to Cameron. For some time he has been embarked on a strategy to rebuild Conservative support in the North. It began in the Arctic Circle (where he is still remembered fondly by the huskies) and last week swung southwards to take in a visit to marginal seats in the North West of England.

My own worry about the report was that its talk of relocating people and building new cities had a tinge of the Soviet about it. It was a 21st century take on building dams to water the Uzbek cotton fields

People have always moved to find work, of course. But they don’t need the government to tell them to do it.

Down the road from here is the site of a mining village called The Bog. Its school has become a visitor centre for the surrounding hills. (I recommend the home-made cakes.)

A few decades ago a hundred children were educated there, and they must have lived somewhere. Bur when I visit it out of season now, I am alone with the curlews.

******

There are reports from Telford of an outbreak of resistance.

A few days ago the Shropshire Star carried this story:

Two campaigners dressed as penguins were removed from Telford Town Park after being told they would need a criminal record check and risk assessment to hand out leaflets.

One of the penguins, Rachel Whittaker, said:

“It was only a fun thing. I was saying to people ‘Hello I’m a penguin and my ice cap has melted so I’ve ended up in Telford - can I give you a leaflet’. People were loving it.”

But officialdom was implacable.

Hearteningly, that was not the end of the matter. Rachel and her fellow penguin have returned to the park and comments on the newspaper’s website have been supportive:

How ridiculous! when people have been mugged in Hollinswood and Wellington … that’s what we need to be monitoring, not innocent people in penguin suits.

******

The Daily Mail journalist Allison Pearson is being sued for failing to deliver a novel for which she received a large advance.

There is an irony in this.

Long ago and far away, I was at school with a girl called Allison Lobbett. And all authorities agree that she grew up to become Allison Pearson.

She had no trouble writing in those days. If you held up your hand for more paper before she did during the O levels you were doing really well.

People who want the inside story should make the journey out here more often. We know such interesting things, me and the curlews.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

johnfranklyn
27 August 2008 at 12:40

This is a ridiculous affair.T&W Council did the same last year to a senior Citizen. The Council now want residents to phone then first beore they use the park.

It is interesting how they refer to CRB Checks, yet people work within the confines of the Park and are not CRB Checked.

This is not about safety of any kind, it is about stopping people from having their say on issues affecting them. More can be read on

www.telfordcouncilwatch.org.uk

johnfranklyn
05 September 2008 at 18:31

Hidden Policy – Selective safe guards

From letters Page Shropshire Star

This in response to the articles and letters about the councils restrictions for people wishing to distribute leaflets in the Town Park.

I believe wholeheartedly in freedom of speech and to me the councils actions appeared to be heavy handed.

I have therefore investigated as best I could but have not completed the investigations.

As far as I can find out there is no law requiring leaflet distributors to have CRB checks. I am, however, slightly puzzled as to why leaflet dstributors want to operate in childrens play grounds.

The council drew up comprehensive child protection procedures based on guidance produced by the Government in 1999.

The laudable aim of this is

"To offer a safe, secure, happy and exciting environment and how a duty of care in which children learn through play and discovery"

The town Park is obviously a place where children gather and "this duty of care applies"

It was therefore decided that anyone wanting to distribute leaflets should be required to,

1.Provie a copy of the leaflet to the Town Park Manager

2.Complete a Risk Assessment

3.Sign an agreement to maintain certain standards of behaviour(including having a CRB check)

All members of the Town Park Staff are instructed to approach anyone distributing leaflets in the Town Park in order to check they have carried out this procedure.

However, the existence of these requirements is NOT common knowledge and people tended to become upset on being approached on the matter.

Denis Allen

Wellington

Cabinet Member T&W Council

Response to the Response

From Telford Council Watch

Whilst it is good to see a Cabinet Member speak out, it is clear that even this letter is somewhat restricted but maintains the usual bias towards Telford and Wrekin Council.

If No Law exists to make Leaflet distributors have a CRB check, their policy is somewhat flawed, not only by the fact that it is hidden.

It is also flawed in the fact that it only covers the Town Park and not EVERY play area throughout the Borough of Telford and Wrekin.

Why?

It is an attempt to restrict residents freedom of speech as Telford and Wrekin Council want to build on it and around the confines of what they describe as “the Jewel in the Crown”, which it is, because it is the most valuable and sought after green space in the Borough.

What he fails to mention, and maybe its because he’s not completed his investigation, is the fact that Town Park Staff are required to approach ANY ADULT who walk in the Town Park without a child.

It is statements like this that can cause moral panic and their actions could’ve have mud thrown at an innocent person, that no matter what, will stick.

The Council fail to act on those that openly film and photograph around these play areas and evidence of films a splashed all over the internet.

Are photographers, filmers now required to complete a CRB check, Risk Assessment and have their images vetted before they leave the Town Park.

Telford and Wrekin Councils Policy has so many holes in it, they are the only things holding it together and you could easily drive a truck through them.

This issue was raised in mid 2007 after the Council ejected a senior citizen from the Park, yet failed to act then and continue to operate flawed policy, practice and procedure now.

John Franklyn

Telford Council Watch

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Jonathan Calder

Jonathan Calder has been a district councillor and contributed to speeches by Paddy Ashdown and Charles Kennedy. These days he prefers to poke gentle fun from the sidelines. He blogs at Liberal England

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?