Return to: Home | Life & Society | Society

The power of one

Ben White

Published 07 August 2008

Observations on Palestine

For the past fortnight, rumours have been circulating that the Palestinian Authority (PA) is considering a unilateral declaration of statehood. "Many agree that it's time to end all this negotiation nonsense and work on peaceful resistance," a Palestinian insider confided this past week.

The PA is considering several options: stopping all negotiations with Israel and severing diplomatic contact, unilaterally declaring Palestinian statehood, or removing PA security forces, which act as a cover for humiliating Israeli military operations, from West Bank cities - a move suggested by the Palestinian prime minister, Salam Fayyad.

The 30 July announcement by the Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, that he would resign after party leadership elections in September has left the ailing peace process in even greater trouble. In the Jerusalem Post, a PA official described "the chances of reaching an agreement with Israel before the end of 2008" as "zero".

But the Palestinians are not rushing to make their strategic move. The political analyst Ali Jarbawi believes that "waiting until the end of the year is best" and will allow the Palestinians to avoid blame for the talks' collapse. The US's insistence, against all the evidence, that a peace agreement can be reached by the end of the year also, paradoxically, strengthens the argument that a different way forward is needed.

There is a sense of déjà vu about all of this. In 2000, before the ill-fated Camp David talks, the PLO debated a unilateral declaration of statehood. Israel warned it might respond by annexing swaths of the West Bank - a threat that would ring hollow this time around, as it is already busy doing just that.

Jarbawi, for one, thinks it better to stop the negotiations in the face of Israel's incessant creation of "facts on the ground". He even hints at what would be the ultimate expression of Palestinian unilateralism: dissolving the PA.

"What will happen to the PA? Will we continue with the PA as a captive authority until Israel has finished doing what it wants? Or will we tell the world and Israel that enough is enough - we've been trying so hard for the last 15 years, we couldn't reach a settlement, and we learned our lesson."

The Palestinians say their new ideas are driven by the increasing perception that the peace process, and even the PA itself, simply provide a cover for Israeli occupation and land seizure with a pretence of "interim" autonomy.

If senior Palestinian officials decide to "go it alone", it would be hard to blame them. In May, a former PA official told me that in private many officials admit they are just going through the motions of the peace process, waiting for the right moment to change both strategy and goal. That moment may now be a bit closer.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

benwhite
11 August 2008 at 10:52

Interestingly, this piece has just appeared in Ha'aretz:

"Senior Palestinian negotiator Ahmed Qureia said Sunday that the Palestinians may demand to become part of a binational state if Israel continued to reject the borders they propose for a separate country.

Qureia, who heads Palestinian negotiators in U.S.-brokered talks with Israel, told Fatah party loyalists behind closed doors that a two-state solution could be achieved only if Israel met their demands to withdraw from all Palestinian territory in accordance with 1967 borders, a reference to land in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip that Israel captured in the 1967 Six Day War.

"The Palestinian leadership has been working on establishing a Palestinian state within the '67 borders," Qureia said.

"If Israel continues to oppose making this a reality, then the Palestinian demand for the Palestinian people and its leadership [would be] one state, a binational state," he added at the meeting held in the West Bank town of Ramallah.

Qureia's comments were carried in a statement issued after the meeting...."

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jh...

bennbobb
11 August 2008 at 13:04

hi hehe my name is Ben White im from Australia

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Ben White

Ben White is a freelance journalist specialising in Palestine/Israel who has written for Comment is Free, the New Statesman, and Electronic Intifada among others. He can be contacted at ben@benwhite.org.uk

Read More

Vote!

Will China rule the world?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker